Posted on 03/15/2021 8:00:51 AM PDT by Red Badger
A poem defending Dr. Seuss was posted on Facebook recently. I expect it to be banned soon, so I’ll re-post it here:
===============================================================
Alas they’ve come for Dr. SEUSS, they wish to hang him with a noose.
They claim his tales were racist bent, they judged him fast, missed what he meant.
But if we look inside his tales, you’ll find the balance of the scales.
Remember when Horton heard a Who, and we heard the wisdom of the Lorax too.
The lesson behind Green Eggs and Ham, that changed the mind of Sam I am.
Remember too the rotten Grinch, who once would never give an inch.
He taught us lessons, one and all, boys and girls, big and small.
So if you’ve judged his works as poor, you should re- read them, I implore.
The man we know as Dr. SEUSS, turned our imaginations loose.
His impact was beyond compare, he taught us it was good to care.
To accept the red, the blue, the green, and on each other we can lean.
So if you still won’t give an inch, your heart has hardened like the Grinch.
Release the grudge, the hate, the rue, and embrace the hope of Cindy Lou.
===========================================================
Arguing the merits or demerits of Dr. Seuss, Pepe Le Pew or Mr. Potato Head is not just ridiculous. It also helps champions of censorship to trap you into conceding that it’s somehow okay to ban something if somebody somewhere finds it offensive. Actually, it’s okay only if the right “somebodies” find it offensive.
Is there only one opinion about that and increasingly, about everything else? When was it decided and by whom that we must have collective agreement about what is and isn’t offensive? -and whose opinion is required to prevail? Probably not yours.
I find the twisted values and anti-American sentiments of the radical Left in this country to be deeply offensive and even dangerous, but I would never think of trying to force others to agree with me. Funny how that quintessentially American value is among those that socialists and communists hate most.
If I advocated for the persecution or prosecution of America-haters I’d be a raging hypocrite. Remember that archaic idea of hypocrisy? That intellectual honesty requires that one should hold oneself to the same standard to which he seeks to hold everyone else.
It doesn’t matter whether a growing number of self-appointed dictators suddenly think Dr. Seuss is a racist. They simply don’t get to choose for everyone else.
Remember that favorite Leftist bumper sticker? “If you don’t approve of abortion don’t have one.” The Left only understands freedom only when it comes having an abortion. They are oddly incapable of applying their rhetoric on that issue to any other body part or aspect of our lives.
In their world you absolutely must have the freedom to kill a baby but you’d better not read him Horton Hears a Who if he’s fortunate enough to be born. If Broadway ever emerges from the Covid lockdowns what will they do about Seussical?
From forced masking and shutting down the businesses and lives of private citizens, banning cartoons, singling out and censoring conservatives, and the obvious step of forced vaccinations, the issue is Liberty. (Look for another new piece about popularizing yet another discarded relic of liberalism: ‘Conscientious Objectors.’) The bad news is that there is always more. Authoritarians are never satisfied, ever.
Without freedom of expression, individual choice and personal responsibility among other fundamental principles all currently under assault, America cannot survive. It is difficult even now for some to comprehend that the party in power is working aggressively to achieve exactly that.
Dr. Seuss is only the current excuse. Oh no! That’s a Seussian rhyme! Should I be burned at the stake?
Hurling the invective of Racist! Racist! is another excuse for the same thing. When it is necessary to manufacture racism because there’s not enough to create the proper cause celebre, you know they are married to the means because it will accomplish their end.
The government does not have the power to control thought or speech in the United States of America, but that’s what socialists and communists are doing before our very eyes. So far, they are getting away with it.
The Colorado legislature is running a bill to institute a “Ministry of Truth.” Could our parents ever have imagined the chutzpah to even introduce such a bill let alone pass it?
The best way to protect our own freedom of speech is to protect speech we don’t like and to utilize our freedom to speak out where and how we wish. Once upon a time, Liberals and Leftists knew that. In fact, it was one of their signature issues.
Now they are the book burners. Take a look at a scene from the 1989 film, Field of Dreams. Ray Kinsella’s very liberal wife Annie stands up at a school board meeting to decry censorship. Watch how proud she is for standing against book burning and for the First Amendment.
Where have those “good liberals” gone? They are all hiding behind masks and rushing to see who can be most obedient to the all-powerful State.
It’s time to argue all of it on the grounds of Liberty.
We have the right to say yes to Dr. Seuss and no to masking, muzzling, and forced vaccinations.
We have the right to think, feel and act differently from the hoardes and to fight “institutionalized” discrimination of those who choose to do so.
We have the right to exercise our free will and to welcome the personal responsibility that comes with it.
Liberty for All is what is under attack. Today it’s Dr. Seuss. Tomorrow, it’ll be the color of your underwear or whether, depending on your level of obedience you are allowed to wear it at all.
It’s not essential, but I think Dr. Seuss would agree.
It’s not the government, therefore it’s not censorship, therefore your complaint is invalid.
It is censorship. It just is not government censorship. Censorship can be carried out by the government, by corporate entities, or by private pressure groups. Government censorship is generally unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
It is not censorship. It’s the owner of a product, one you probably never cared about, deciding to not sell it anymore. That’s legitimate exercise of their ownership rights.
Just like when the mafia tells a business it has to shut down operations in their neighborhood. It's the business owner exercising ownership rights. The fact that mafia is threatening broken kneecaps for the owner is immaterial.
Nope. Just like when Cheetos decided there was no market for a certain flavor. Nobody forced them. The fact is nobody but the most diehard Seuss fans have even heard of these books. In a sane world nobody would care they got pulled from the market.
Yup. Mafia threat.
Now you’re a liar. Congrats. We’re done.
No, you're a liar. And you're dung.
If you would actually read posts that you are responding to you would realize that I did not dispute the right of the owner of a work to decide to no longer publish it. I also acknowledged that it is eBay's prerogative to ban all sales of existing copies of the books on their platform, even though that clearly is censorship.
The First Amendment protects the right of anyone to publish or refuse to publish or to sell or refuse to sell any books they choose, whether it is because they find certain books offensive or simply because they are woke corporations who are catering to the far left. The First Amendment also protects my right to complain about book banning by woke corporations catering to the far left.
Who cares what ebay says. Again, their business, they don’t have to sell anything. That’s not censorship. I never said you can’t complain, I said your complaints lack facts. They’re just childish whining declaring things to be something they aren’t. If you want to continue to spout things that are factually wrong and show you to be ignorant go right ahead.
That’s all you got huh? Just a flame attack, you can’t even bother to write. Well, not a surprise. So now that we both know you’re wrong, have a great day.
Trying to have a conversation with you is like trying to argue with a stump, only far less interesting. Have you ever posted on any thread on Free Republic in which you have not resorted to ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagrees with you?
The bottom line is no one cares what you have to say about anything. So feel free to get in the last stupid word, because I know you will throw a temper tantum and wet your pants if you don’t.
You haven’t tried to have a conversation. Linking to a flame attack is not a conversation. Jerking off on your first amendment right to be full of it is not a conversation. You insulted me. I didn’t insult you. I don’t insult most people, not until they’ve fully established they’re addicted to flame. Then I call them an idiot, because they are, and I leave.
The bottom line is you’re wrong. I showed you’re wrong, and now your feelings are hurt, and you’re lashing out like a child. Only temper tantrum here was your link. I don’t care about the state of your pants.
Oh you’re so cute when you’re being a flame addicted fool. Thanks for proving me right. Bye now moron.
Absolutely.
But trying to prevent the sale of already published books is beyond that.
EBay is a private company and can make their own decisions. They limit all kinds of stuff from sale. Some for good reasons, some for stupid.
And why you loose repeatedly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.