The Electric Fusion Sun
If you want on or off the Electric Universe/Plasma Ping List, Freepmail me.
Posted on 03/08/2021 9:27:59 AM PST by Kevmo
February 16, 2021 • 103 Comments Update From Aureon Energy
Thanks to Gerard McEk for posting the following update from Aureon Ltd. At the moment I am not sure what the source is for this text. It looks like it could be a communication to current and/or potential investors.
In our latest experiments, we found transmutation occurring not only on the anode but all through the sample. Furthermore, the manganese that is being made in the atmosphere has been discovered to be depositing onto the cathode! Keep in mind, there is no manganese in SAFIRE. This shows the predictions by the Wal Thornhill – EU are correct in that transmutation occurs in the Sun’s atmosphere.
I usually enjoy these kinds of articles. This time I’m not getting the upshot.
Why is this reactor type better than lftr’s liquid flouride thorium reactors? or a fusion reactor. —both of which not ready for prime time.
Is SAFIRE safer, less expensive... or is it just a new state of nature whose possibilities are being explored byo a nuclear reactor?
Explain the possibilities.
Is this an example of cold fusion. Likely not. But what is it that makes this reactor better than hot fusion or LFTR reactors.
Is SAFIRE safer or less expensive or what?
At this point, the last. BUT..if early indications pan out, it will be far less expensive and far easier to implement than "standard fusion" involving "tokamak-like" approaches, and far safer than any fission approach.
There is also the unique possibility that it will be able to remediate existing radioactive waste simply and cheaply.
If you want on or off the Electric Universe/Plasma Ping List, Freepmail me.
I said “it doesn’t add up FOR ME.” I didn’t tell you how to think. If you buy into it, more power to ya.
And I asked, civily, what specifically "didn't add up". I see nowhere that I implied you told me "how to think". It was a simple question.
It’s basically warm fusion.
Grad students are cheap...................
Good find. This has details I haven’t seen before. Lots to study here.
Well, this isn’t actually a nuclear reactor. This is more like (if their theory is correct), creating a miniature sun in the laboratory.
That might sound like another kind of nuclear reactor, but under their theory, stars are not powered by nuclear fission or fusion at all, but are purely electrical/plasma phenomena.
No. The theory is that it is electrical phenomena that drive the fusion reactions instead of gravity pressure. Fusion still happens, as does transmutation synthesis of heavier elements.
“The theory is that it is electrical phenomena that drive the fusion reactions instead of gravity pressure”
Yes, I suppose I should have said “thermonuclear fusion” rather than just fusion, since there would still be fusing of elements happening, just not through the process that the standard model proposes.
This appears to be some kind of weird self-organizing magnetic containment field for fusion.
LFTR is fission. It’s a lot like trying to squeeze 2 magnets together when they wanna repel each other. That’s fusion. When all hell breaks loose and the SHTF, those magnets (and fusible material) will repel eachother and cease to react.
With fission, it’s like you’re trying to keep 2 magnets apart from each other when they really wanna attract and come together. So when all hell breaks loose — like an earthquake + tsunami at Fikushima — the 2 sides wanna join together and make all kinds of heat. Radioactive heat.
They say it is a nuclear reactor, because elements are being created in the plasma reaction that were not formerly present.
Matter is being created.
a la Louis Slotin... (R.I. P.)
Yep, congrats for figuring that out!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
