Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, a Stock Can Have Short Interest Over 100% -- Here's How
Motely Fool ^ | 01/28/2021 | Dan Caplinger

Posted on 01/28/2021 2:02:21 PM PST by Kid Shelleen

Recent events have thrust the practice of selling a stock short into the spotlight. With companies like GameStop (NYSE: GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings seeing their shares soar as the result of short squeezes, everyone's getting an education about the dynamics of short-selling and how it actually works.

In this latest short-selling controversy, many investors have been confused by the sheer level of exposure that short-sellers have to certain stocks. For instance, GameStop recently had short interest that exceeded 100% of its available shares. That left many investors completely gobsmacked -- but there's a simple explanation for how situations like the one we're currently in can come about.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: gamestop; markets; stocks; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2021 2:02:21 PM PST by Kid Shelleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

The MSM trying to do some ‘splaining for their buddies.


2 posted on 01/28/2021 2:04:21 PM PST by taxcontrol (You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Can you short-sell stocks that you actually own?


3 posted on 01/28/2021 2:06:27 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far greater danger from authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No, unless on another account.
Although it makes zero practical sense.


4 posted on 01/28/2021 2:08:21 PM PST by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Government deficits.

Deficit spending.


5 posted on 01/28/2021 2:09:44 PM PST by Varsity Flight ( "War by the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That’s called short against the box. Completely legitimate and should be the only lawful short sale.


6 posted on 01/28/2021 2:12:08 PM PST by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
but there's a simple explanation for how situations like the one we're currently in can come about.

The big guys are allowed to cheat.

The real reason.

7 posted on 01/28/2021 2:14:09 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (May their path be strewn with Legos, may they step on them with bare feet until they repent. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
No, unless on another account. Although it makes zero practical sense.

How is it different from selling an option on a stock you own?

8 posted on 01/28/2021 2:18:31 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far greater danger from authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
The more I see about this the more confusing it gets.

"The investor who loans you the shares has the right to get them back at any time with little notice."

"Annie owns shares of GameStop, and Annie and her broker have an agreement that allows the broker to lend Annie's shares to short-sellers. It lends them to Bob, who subsequently sells those borrowed shares short in hopes that GameStop's share price will fall.

An investor named Chris ends up buying those borrowed shares from Bob. However, Chris has no way of knowing that those shares have been borrowed from Annie. To Chris, they're just like any other shares."

Is this true for anyone? When you or your 401k manager buy(s) a stock, it can be sucked away from you by "Annie" because you didn't know it was "on loan"?

Since the stock in question went up so high, why doesn't "Annie" just take them back? Then they'd have all the profit yes?

When "Annie" takes it back, do "Bob" and "Chris" transactions just disappear as if they never happened and no money changes hands?

9 posted on 01/28/2021 2:23:25 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

The word is “rehypothecation.” transferring collateral from one party to the next in a long daisy-chain

This is a big problem in China (and now the USA) Someone takes a deed on a building, or a truckload of copper, or oil - and uses it as collateral on a loan. That holder then takes that same deed, and also uses it as collateral on a loan - and so on down the line.

When the actual owner then goes looking for it - they find that its been passed along and transferred away, and the whole scheme collapses.


10 posted on 01/28/2021 2:28:37 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How is it different from selling an option on a stock you own?

When you sell the option, you still own the stock, you are selling the right to buy it from you at a set price.


11 posted on 01/28/2021 2:28:59 PM PST by Mouton (The enemy of the people is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There was a time when short selling what you owned was allowed as a tax strategy. “A short sell against the box is the act of short selling securities that you already own, but without closing out the existing long position. This results in a neutral position where all gains in a stock are equal to the losses and net to zero. The purpose is to avoid realizing capital gains from a sale to close, and so it has been restricted by regulators in practice.”


12 posted on 01/28/2021 2:32:04 PM PST by Mouton (The enemy of the people is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Thanks. I used to know this stuff, but since I just buy indexed funds now I am out of practice.


13 posted on 01/28/2021 2:39:28 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far greater danger from authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

the ONLY reason the criminals get away with this is:
1. they paid of the corrupt GOP and DNC, and
2. Peter Strzok’s wife is in charge of SEC “investigations”.
they are untrustable since before the Titanic was
burnt by his grandfather.


14 posted on 01/28/2021 2:40:45 PM PST by Diogenesis ("when a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

I just read a tutorial on short selling and think I understand it. I will say this: a novice investor, I invested very low five figures early last year for my sons starting right before the crash but only for very little money to start. I bought many diversified issues when the market was at bottom,
Dumping all the money I could I to it. one son made 137% over the last year, the other 80. While small investors should avoid jumping in an out, this overheated market and the ruinous incoming policies of the administration have me judiciously, gradually but consistently, pulling back into cash, and both are around 50% cash now.

We bought AMC when it was very low, and sold almost everything when we were up about 250%. Sold the last shares yesterday at 700% above our purchase price. Thanks short sellers! Sorry about you getting crushed and all.


15 posted on 01/28/2021 2:43:27 PM PST by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No... a short sell by definition is borrowing a share from the brokerage (who takes it from another account or holds a certain amount in a central account) and selling it at the current market price. Then when you close you have to buy a share to give back to the brokerage.

If you own the share you can sell it out right expecting it to drop and then buy back in - same idea, just a different method.


16 posted on 01/28/2021 2:47:55 PM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

An option is the right to execute at a specific price on a certain date. You aren’t required to exercise the option and your risk is only what you paid for the right to own the option. Call expecting price to go up, Put expecting price to go down.

A short sell you sell a borrowed share of stock at current market price. When you close - you MUST purchase the stock to close the position - independent of the cost - shorts have potentially infinite price exposure.


17 posted on 01/28/2021 2:50:14 PM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

You can’t just swap in your own stock. That makes sense. Thanks.


18 posted on 01/28/2021 2:51:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far greater danger from authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
this is nonsense. stopping votes is like stopping sales.


19 posted on 01/28/2021 2:53:17 PM PST by Diogenesis ("when a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

The article is horse hockey. They are saying that borrowed shares can be borrowed and relended multiple times, and they can’t.

The FACT is Citadel sold 140% of GME all by themselves without owning the shares. That’s a naked short, and it’s illegal. Now the press is trying to cover up the illegality. The Motley Fool of all places.

Citadel clears 65% of Robin Hood’s trades for them. They are forcing Robin Hood to involuntarily close down individual shareholders positions in GME today.

This stinks so bad it makes synthetic CDO’s look pedestrian by comparison.


20 posted on 01/28/2021 2:58:42 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson