Posted on 01/15/2021 12:14:15 PM PST by Ponce de Leon County
We received a lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
WTF!
They simply reprinted the statement given them [under threat of lawsuit, no doubt] that included the canned apology.
Rather clever, I think.
American Thinker is off my list of readable websites as they cave to Dominion’s lies.
Is it a retraction though? Looks like the entire letter was written by Dominion, and American Thinker just said ‘ok, we’ll publish the letter (so the whole world can see it)’.
The newspapers that published Ted Kaczynski’s manifesto didn’t have to agree with it to publish it.
American Thinker has gone into CYA mode.
• They have turned off comments, because “they didn’t have the staff to moderate comments”; in other words: they were afraid of being cancelled like Parler.
• They have groveled before Dominion software.
I saw the Pillsbury Peg Boy Jonah Goldberg all smug with this legal threat.
Let’s see what happens with Sidney Powell. I am waiting for her case.
Dominion claimed it wasnt connected to the internet, and it was, because the company changed things remotely in real time when they were called.
Also high school students did hack the voting machines in about 2 minutes.
“They simply reprinted the statement given them [under threat of lawsuit, no doubt] that included the canned apology.”
I don’t understand. If American Thinker senior management certified that statement of their error, why isn’t it a retraction?
American Thinker can now publish articles explaining how they examined the data (and show us the data) and came to the wrong conclusion.
Was this guy lying or delusional?
ML/NJ
The newspapers that published Kaczynski’s manifesto did not say: “These statements are false” and “It was wrong for us to publish these false statements.”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3925596/posts
American Thinker doesn't have the documentation to prove Dominion's guilt. That information resides with Sidney Powell.
Here are some questions that weren’t addressed.
1. Do the Dominion System Voting machines share substantial algorithms and source code logic with the SmartMatic voting machines developed for Venezuela’s elections?
2. Do Dominion tabulation and adjudication servers connect to the internet to perform any functions during vote processing?
3. Do Dominion systems allow adjudicators and system administrators to share credentials such that there is no ability to audit individuals and their actions on the machines?
5. Although Dominion system employees may not have engaged in fraud does the Dominion System equipment and software make fraudulent use of their system virtually impossible using well defined cybersecurity practices and designs? If so why did the state of Texas find your machines completely deficient and unsuitable for public use?
I guess if they hadn’t trashed their own reporting those would questions they could address.
Not sure what’s weird about it, as you claim in the title. Seems pretty straightforward.
The apology/retraction doesn’t seem very sincere, but a “if you insist we apologize, we’re sorry” kind of thing. It is a tacit admission of guilt and it does show that these media outlets, blogs, kooky youtubers and tweeters do NOT have evidence to back up their crazy claims. They are backing down because they realize they crossed a line and placed themselves in legal jeopardy.
It remains to be seen what happens when the far left controls the WH and both houses of congress. Will congress and the DOJ go after those that took things further than simple defamation? Those that stirred insurrection, called for military tribunals, executions or overthrow of the government? Leftist governments have a history of doing so, and the left wing media is begging them to “punish” Trump supporters. Being “cancelled” isn’t enough. They want blood.
It was wrong for us to publish these false statements. We apologize to Dominion for all of the harm this caused them and their employees. We also apologize to our readers for abandoning 9 journalistic principles and misrepresenting Dominion’s track record and its limited role in tabulating votes for the November 2020 election. We regret this grave error.
Here are the 9 principles of journalism. What did they violate?
1. Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth
2. Its first loyalty is to citizens
3. Its essence is a discipline of verification
4. Its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover
5. It must serve as an independent monitor of power
6. It must provide a forum for public criticism and compromise
7. It must strive to make the significant interesting and relevant
8. It must keep the news comprehensive and proportional
9. Its practitioners must be allowed to exercise their personal conscience
10. Citizens, too, have rights and responsibilities when it comes to the news
Add #11. We fold like Superman on laundry day on any of our core principles if threatened to be sued, because in reality we are ball-less!
“American Thinker and contributors Andrea Widburg, R.D. Wedge, Brian Tomlinson, and Peggy Ryan have published pieces on www.AmericanThinker.com that falsely accuse US Dominion Inc., Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., and Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (collectively “Dominion”) of conspiring to steal the November 2020 election from Donald Trump. These pieces rely on discredited sources who have peddled debunked theories about Dominion’s supposed ties to Venezuela, fraud on Dominion’s machines that resulted in massive vote switching or weighted votes, and other claims falsely stating that there is credible evidence that Dominion acted fraudulently.
These statements are completely false and have no basis in fact. Industry experts and public officials alike have confirmed that Dominion conducted itself appropriately and that there is simply no evidence to support these claims.
It was wrong for us to publish these false statements. We apologize to Dominion for all of the harm this caused them and their employees. We also apologize to our readers for abandoning 9 journalistic principles and misrepresenting Dominion’s track record and its limited role in tabulating votes for the November 2020 election. We regret this grave error. “
CAVE.
Jar-Jar Fatberg, neocon clown.
Dominion claimed it wasnt connected to the internet, and it was, because the company changed things remotely in real time when they were called.
Yes, a Dominion tech in Colorado changed the precinct on Susie Voyles' poll pad in Georgia.
Also in Georgia, remote updates were done to voting machines before the "election", causing a couple of them to be offline the morning of said "election".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.