Posted on 12/31/2020 3:51:25 PM PST by Fawn
Politico reports that Majority Leader Mitch McConnell held a conference call with Senate Republicans today and he pressed Hawley multiple times to explain his plans to object to the electoral college.
Hawley was not on the conference call.
(Excerpt) Read more at toddstarnes.com ...
Hawley for Majority Leader. Go away, McC.
Hawley fo Leader! Great idea.
How can he press Hawley if he wasn’t on the call?
Suddenly returned to DC. Something supposedly coming down
There you go. He is compromised
Can one republican come forward and explain why the election returns in the five states in question just stopped counting ON election night? Why did they shut down the counting while Trump was way ahead? That’s never happened before and we want an answer.
He may be a turtle, but he’s their turtle.
Right. Communist China is McConnell’s paymaster. He and his old pal Biden are both on the take. So, get rid of Trump who’s been sticking it to China his entire first term—tariffs, demands that they stop stealing intellectual property, calling them out for their aggression in the South China Sea, joint military maneuvers with Australia, etc.
McConnell doesn’t want anyone digging into his collusion with China. He knows Biden is going to reverse Trump’s policies with regard to China. McConnell is a traitor. He’s disgusting. He should be recalled and thrown in jail.
He should be made into a soup.
BUMP
I think you hit the nail dead center......& Happy New Year
The only people who Hawley owes an explanation to are the Voters from
MO. F Mitch.
Kind of hard to answer when you are not on the call.....
haha. He can’t handle the truth!
by pressing Hawley, McConnell is signaling that he is ignorant of what is going on around him. And so should welcome an opportunity hear for himself, firsthand testimony that will occur as a result of any objections.
That he doesn’t want that entered into public record is concerning.
After the late meeting at the wh... things (maybe arrests). Start today; 1/1
I think the first statement I saw from Mitch on this subject was that he did not want a scene where every senator had to vote on the issue. He does not want Republicans in a situation where they'd be supporting, or not supporting the president.
That's how I understood things as this unfolded, but that could be wrong.
You are absolutely right a out the deviation between chronological age and age based on lifestyle. I am now nearing my
81st BD and in better shape than at age 57 when I retired due to many health issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.