Posted on 12/20/2020 9:20:06 PM PST by nickcarraway
A majority of workers (57%) in the latest CNBC|SurveyMonkey Workforce Happiness Survey say they would support a requirement that everyone at their workplace or office receive a Covid-19 vaccination soon after it becomes available to the public. While political leaders in the U.S. have been hesitant to make sweeping regulations related to the coronavirus, business leaders may be in a unique position that would allow them to enforce strict measures in their work environments.
Public health professionals have been clear that vaccinations are the key to fully reopening businesses, workplaces, and schools. In the new poll of more than 9,000 workers nationwide, conducted Nov. 30 to Dec. 7, nearly four in 10 workers (39%) say they are still not fully back to the office, including 22% who are still working fully from home.
But company leaders and HR teams are in a bind: without a fully vaccinated workforce, they can't guarantee the safety of their employees, and yet many workers are still hesitant to get the vaccine — and even more are nervous about being forced to do so by their employer.
Workers in some white collar industries are a bit more likely than others to support requiring vaccinations among their colleagues. Those working in consulting and research (68%), entertainment and leisure (67%), and technology (64%) are some of the most in favor of requiring vaccinations before returning to work.
Workers in the health care and pharmaceuticals industries are no more likely than workers overall to favor requiring workers to be inoculated before returning to work (57%).
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnewyork.com ...
must memorize this new mantra
The horrors of the Bataan Death March itself could be a miniseries.
____________________________________________
The horrors of the two Atomic Bombs dropped in Japan and its repercussions can be a major-series.
From time to time we hear stories of a “fanatically religious” family in the US (or elsewhere). Their child has leukemia (or something else that’s bad) and the family chooses to pray for a cure rather than take the child for medical treatment.
A lot of people (FR and elsewhere) think that’s horrible and demand that the government step in and force that family to step aside so that mandated medical treatment can be provided to the child.
I think that if the freedom of choice to taken from the parents of minor children, then we cannot be surprised when the government turns around and takes away our freedom of choice for our own care.
It’s another example of people demanding a totally Safe society in which no bad thing ever happens to anyone. That’s how you get masks and quarantines, it’s how you get children removed from their families and sent into unwanted chemotherapy, and it’s how you get mandatory injections of experimental vaccines.
I don’t want to live in a Safe society. Too many bad things happen.
A family member who works in a civilian function on an Army base was tasked with collecting information from her staff of about a hundred regarding how many would want the vaccine when it became available.
She reported that about half refused to answer and about 10% of the rest said they might
Federal workers. Maybe there’s hope?
I’ll disagree regarding your subject persons.
As one of them, I can affirm that not one of my peers in the community ever stated that they enjoyed the work. They just know that it had to be done and that would rather they do it than their sons.
Ask a warrior about peace, they know the cost, personal and collective, about war.
It seems the majority of people have be talked to are not planning on getting the vaccine. Some of them surprised me.
A few weeks ago I had a somewhat heated conversation with one of the leaders at my church about their capitulating to CID.
I asked what the end game was and he said “the vaccine of course”
I asked at what point do they kick us out of the church?
He honestly had no inkling that anyone would not blindly go along with the government plan. I told him I knew of many people in the congregation who had no intention of taking the shot.
The employment of the atomic bombs were not war crimes. They were legitimate acts of war against a declared enemy. Both the Axis and the Allies had been conducting the bombing of cities for entire length of WW II. The only difference with the atomic bombs were the singular destructive fire power, and the aftermath of radiation (which was not even fully understood as even a threat at the time of their use).
The Bataan Death March and the whole-scale torture, starvation, and murder of British, Australian, American, Canadian, New Zealand, South African, and Philippine troops (and also civilians) was a War Crime.
That's the difference - a BIG one.
Except no, or almost no vaccine really does that - certainly this one and the FLU vaccine don’t do that.
Pastor said this could very well be the “ mark of the beast”...in order to buy or sell.
Idiots. Idiots who are destroying our civilization. They’ve all the reasoning power of a three-year old, but are convinced they are geniuses.
That’s the study. Thanks for finding it.
It is a poll in the media. If you have learned anything over the last twelve months, it’s that a poll published by the MSM is fake.
I am essential, so I got to work through all of it.
No one in the office died, but we know people that did.
This “vaccine” is not going to help like many people think it will. For one thing, it does NOT stop you from getting sick.
Yet the stay at home elite want it to be mandatory. How about they get back to work and on with life.
Polls have a strange way of agreeing with the message democrats want to get out.
I wouldn’t trust a pollster any further than I could throw one...
LOL That’s a good one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.