Are those the only two possibilities you can think of?
Posted on 12/17/2020 11:33:09 AM PST by MNDude
In discussing @realDonaldTrump in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberwts stated that he would make sure "the (profane word used for TRUMP) would never be re-elected" Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.
And:
This may be most important tweet of my life. Chief Justice John Roberts is corupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately. They are "anti-Trumpers" dedicated to preventing public from knowing TRUTH of @realDonaldTrump re-election.
AND
I have long had questions about "the John Roberts" on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Sure, you could be right. But if millions of Americans come to know the corruption of Justice Roberts, then he’s shamed to take certain actions.
I say, keep the pressure on.
Making a claim on CSPAN
Are those the only two possibilities you can think of?
Would make sense.
If such a conversation was somehow intercepted, it follows that either Roberts or Breyer (or both) have been under surveillance. This would be a rather unique situation of a SCOTUS Justice being monitered, especially given that John Roberts and the SCOTUS oversee the FISA courts and would have to approve.
That alone makes it unlikely, but if true - that's pretty ominous Unless a cell phone comm was intercepted
Let's see what happens.
If it did happen and Roberts and Breyer thought they were secure - well, they just got a heck of a wake up call.
There is a fine line between first amendment speech and an officer of the court criticizing the judiciary.
* * *
Normally, that would be true. But our very Nation’s survival as a free republic is at stake. An insurrection is happening before our eyes.
That calls for strong words.
It may be that Lin Wood is forcing the hand of SCOTUS and they are likely to take Sidney Powell’s case, but shun Wood’s plea. Just speculation on my part. But psychology is a factor in all of this.
The documentation of my claims about Justices Roberts & Breyer has been placed in hands of several third parties.
When one cannot attack message, all too often messenger is attacked.
But TRUTH cannot be denied. It cannot be destroyed. I have made sure of that TRUTH.
- Lin 🙏— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
Look, this is nonsense.
If he has it show it...
The MI case on the docket.. we know odds of it getting heard are next to nil... if he can prove this the 4 judges who yielded in the TX may be swayed.
Sorry, but your sentiment lines up too well with all the people on the Left who want us to wave the white flag before the final bell.....what’s the rush? If Trump doesn’t prevail, we’ll have plenty of time to accept that reality
If a mother’s teenage kid was missing for 3 weeks, would you tell her “you’re living in a fantasy world if you think your kid is ever gonna come home alive”?..... A compassionate person would understand her need to hold on to some hope..... Do you think that all of us who are hoping and praying that Trump prevails are not seriously considering the possibility that he may not?..... If you’re really a Trump supporter, and you believe the election was stolen, you would not be scolding us like this.....so I call BS on you
I thought Sydney Powell had proof, but so far, I have been disappointed.
“Would he say it if he didn’t?”
Anyone who dumb enough to discourage Republicans from voting in Georgia might say ANYTHING.
Look, this is nonsense.
If he has it show it...
The MI case on the docket.. we know odds of it getting heard are next to nil... if he can prove this the 4 judges who yielded in the TX may be swayed.
If it’s just an allegation will just poison the well.
That was my first thought, too. Then I remembered how FISA surveillance works (I learned at the Q academy).
You get a warrant on one guy, and if he's talking to American citizens, you can surveil them too. Because they are UPSTREAM. They use the term UMBRELLA because all the derps fall under the umbrella of the original warrant.
Roberts could be several layers removed from the original target and not have a clue. If he even has to approve each individual FISA warrant personally, which I'm not sure that he does.
I am tired of the tic tocks, the krakens, and the investigations that all amount to nothing. Rather than inferring that someone must certainly have proof, I want to see it.
You seem hell bent on convincing this board that its nonsense.
Why?
Preach on, brother.
I’m not bent on anything.
Election is being stolen but claims on the internet are nothing..
Think him claiming something without providing proof is meaningless
Like it or not... so far a whole lot of claims out of this guy.. not a lot of anything else
All hat, no cattle..
We already knew Roberts hates Trump.
Is this just Woods being a loose cannon—or is he shooting across Roberts’ bow for a source who could up the ante on Roberts revelations if he doesn’t shock the world by stepping down?
Unfortunately probably more likely the formwr.
Oh, well if you're tired. You shoulda said something.
I'll have Lin Wood...no....Donald Trump himself, personally deliver you all the evidence they have immediately.
First I'll need your security level and code.
Yep. Can you say “Hillary’s 400 missing FBI files”?
Oh, look! HERE they are! I wonder how they got there? I must have passed that table a hundred times, and never noticed those files. My, my, my.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.