If the States do not have standing as to the results of fraud in a National election for the supreme executive office...
Then who exactly the f*ck does?
It’s way past over. Nothing will come of this.
“Because of these case and additional cases filed by Sean Parnell, the Dominion case and others, Turley believes there is a solid chance that the President of the Senate, Mike Pence, will not certify the electors, who vote on December 14th.”
Turley is on solid ground. I think this is the case we have been waiting for. The Texas case may have just been a distraction to get to this case.
Hmmm.
Sadly, I think it IS over.
And yes, I do believe all the accusations of cheating.
When is OUR side gonna start rioting and acting the fool?
I’m READY!
If we don’t win any of these court cases, and the state legislatures don’t act, will Pence have the courage to reject states?
I’d like to see what JONATHAN Turley has to say about the SCOTUS ruling.
Has Harris resigned her senate seat yet?
“THIS IS NOT OVER BY A LONGSHOT!!!”
Nope.... sure isn’t.... except for the pearl clutchers.
MAGA ======> KAG
OK, I’m ready for the backlash
If each state are truly sovereign members of The United States, No state has the right to challenge how another state chooses to (in this case : allow) their own official to screw their residents out of they right to vote under the laws established by their own state legislators. If those legislators do not assert their constitutional power and authority on the matter it’s not to the injury of neighboring/member states. Instead it’s a direct and local injury with in it’s own borders and jurisdiction. The people of such states are the injured parties. The Supreme Court , in this argument, could do no more than remind state legislators of their constitutional authority. While constitutional authority is given to state legislators, nothing compels them to assert that authority. They have delegated it. It does not matter (outside of that state) that state laws were/are ignored because the law makers themselves grant a waver of permission simply by not acting to asserting their own authority to enforce laws they establish.
As much as I agree with everyone who supported the Texas SCOTUS filing, I would expect the same response from SCOTUS if this were Pennsylvania vs Kansas in the 2020 election.
If you take a step back, this is actually a great ruling by SCOTUS.
1. Because the US Constitution gives plenary authority over elections in each state, SCOTUS is telling the states to DO THEIR JOB. As a consequence, it requires engaged citizenry to speak to their elected representatives— and not just rely on a quick fix. As it should be.
2. SCOTUS is not about to open pandora’s box allowing other states to sue other states when they have the means to rectify lawlessness. So in essence, their ruling strengthens the Republic. It requires us to learn and participate.
3. I disagree with Dr. Turley concluding SCOTUS doesn’t want any part of this. No, the ruling signals that if you want SCOTUS to rule on a constitutional issue, you must “COME CORRECT”. These have already been refiled in each of the four states in question, with Donald Trump and citizens of that state.....and they most definitely have standing. SCOTUS will hear the merits of this case.
I could use a little sunshine right now.
Sorry folks Mike Pence is a total establishment guy. He would never do anything outside the normal bounds.
The Texas case would have been an empty victory at best.
Winning the right to have the state legislators appoint the Electors would have resulted in a boatload of turncoat Republicans exposed.
Biden would have gotten all the Electors.
Thanks for posting this. Steve Turley is great. A lot of pessimists occupy Free Republic these days.
Turley has the right perspective. It’s not over by a long shot.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Three minutes of listening to this guy’s fake, irritating, sing-songy voice and he still hadn’t even started to get to the point.
Never again for this guy.