OK, I’m ready for the backlash
If each state are truly sovereign members of The United States, No state has the right to challenge how another state chooses to (in this case : allow) their own official to screw their residents out of they right to vote under the laws established by their own state legislators. If those legislators do not assert their constitutional power and authority on the matter it’s not to the injury of neighboring/member states. Instead it’s a direct and local injury with in it’s own borders and jurisdiction. The people of such states are the injured parties. The Supreme Court , in this argument, could do no more than remind state legislators of their constitutional authority. While constitutional authority is given to state legislators, nothing compels them to assert that authority. They have delegated it. It does not matter (outside of that state) that state laws were/are ignored because the law makers themselves grant a waver of permission simply by not acting to asserting their own authority to enforce laws they establish.
As much as I agree with everyone who supported the Texas SCOTUS filing, I would expect the same response from SCOTUS if this were Pennsylvania vs Kansas in the 2020 election.
I hope that you are, because you’ll be hearing about it in minute detail.
OK, “backlash” here -
So if one State breaks its own laws/constitution and manages to injure another State and/or its citizens rights, who has standing and who should the injured party appeal to in terms of law?