Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS REJECTS Texas Lawsuit! Here’s Why THIS IS NOT OVER BY A LONGSHOT!!!
youtube ^ | 12/12/2020 | Dr. Steve Turley

Posted on 12/12/2020 12:53:49 PM PST by Signalman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 12/12/2020 12:53:49 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

If the States do not have standing as to the results of fraud in a National election for the supreme executive office...

Then who exactly the f*ck does?


2 posted on 12/12/2020 12:56:09 PM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Nancy (sarc)


3 posted on 12/12/2020 12:59:01 PM PST by SMARTY ("It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

The Chinese have standing against Trump.

I think they are saying only Trump has standing. The riffraff that will suffer under a fascist Biden dictatorship are irrelevant.


4 posted on 12/12/2020 1:00:08 PM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

It’s way past over. Nothing will come of this.


5 posted on 12/12/2020 1:01:50 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to says it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

“Because of these case and additional cases filed by Sean Parnell, the Dominion case and others, Turley believes there is a solid chance that the President of the Senate, Mike Pence, will not certify the electors, who vote on December 14th.”

Turley is on solid ground. I think this is the case we have been waiting for. The Texas case may have just been a distraction to get to this case.


6 posted on 12/12/2020 1:02:20 PM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"If the States do not have standing as to the results of fraud in a National election for the supreme executive office...
Then who exactly the f*ck does?"

If a court does not want to rule on the case because the law is clearly on the side of the plaintiff and the legal decision would be disagreeable then they pull the dodge of claiming the plaintiff has "no standing."

7 posted on 12/12/2020 1:03:49 PM PST by wildcard_redneck (COVID lockdowns are the Establishment's attack on the middle class and our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Hmmm.
Sadly, I think it IS over.
And yes, I do believe all the accusations of cheating.
When is OUR side gonna start rioting and acting the fool?
I’m READY!


8 posted on 12/12/2020 1:07:04 PM PST by a real Sheila (WuFlu be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

If we don’t win any of these court cases, and the state legislatures don’t act, will Pence have the courage to reject states?


9 posted on 12/12/2020 1:08:07 PM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The President has/had standing. The subpreme court is illegitimate.
10 posted on 12/12/2020 1:09:35 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I’d like to see what JONATHAN Turley has to say about the SCOTUS ruling.


11 posted on 12/12/2020 1:09:40 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Dems: We cheated fair and square!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
I'm not giving up! Never surrender!


12 posted on 12/12/2020 1:10:03 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Has Harris resigned her senate seat yet?


13 posted on 12/12/2020 1:11:04 PM PST by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

“Then who exactly the f*ck does?”

China?


14 posted on 12/12/2020 1:12:35 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a real Sheila

“When is OUR side gonna start rioting and acting the fool?”

You’ll see how fast the ‘Oathkeepers’ will beat your brains out.


15 posted on 12/12/2020 1:14:21 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: philippa

“If we don’t win any of these court cases, and the state legislatures don’t act, will Pence have the courage to reject states?”

VP Pence doesn’t have the authority to reject states. Only Congress does and that would require both chambers agreeing to do so. All VP Pence does is preside over the counting of the votes and announces the results.


16 posted on 12/12/2020 1:17:12 PM PST by Armscor38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace

speaking of Pence,

has he said a single word since the election?
talk about staying off the grid.....


17 posted on 12/12/2020 1:20:54 PM PST by Jaysin (Trump can’t be beat, if the Democrats don’t cheat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Armscor38

I have heard differently- that he does have that authority. But I could be wrong.


18 posted on 12/12/2020 1:21:24 PM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Why would the Oathkeepers beat Trump supporters?


19 posted on 12/12/2020 1:21:49 PM PST by a real Sheila (WuFlu be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: philippa

VP Pence’s role in the counting is essentially ceremonial.

We may see team efforts of, say, Gaetz and Cruz (the objection phase requires it to be in writing and signed by 1 of each chamber), but once that is entered, each chambers deliberates and then returns a yea or nay to the challenge. It takes 2 yeas to accept the challenge, and the House will never do so.


20 posted on 12/12/2020 1:22:20 PM PST by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson