A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States

Heritage ^ | 12/05/20

[Libloather]

The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database presents a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. Each and every one of the cases in this database represents an instance in which a public official, usually a prosecutor, thought it serious enough to act upon it. And each and every one ended in a finding that the individual had engaged in wrongdoing in connection with an election hoping to affect its outcome - or that the results of an election were sufficiently in question and had to be overturned. It is important to remember that every fraudulent vote that is cast invalidates the vote of an eligible voter, effectively disenfranchising that voter. In addition to diluting the votes of legitimate voters, fraud can have an impact in close elections, and we have many close elections in this country. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list. It does not capture all cases and certainly does not capture reported instances or allegations of election fraud, some of which may be meritorious, that are not investigated or prosecuted. Because of vulnerabilities in the system, election fraud is relatively easy to commit and difficult to detect after-the-fact. Moreover, some public officials appear to be unconcerned with election fraud and fail to pursue cases that are reported to them. It is a general truism that you don’t find what you don’t look for. This database is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed. Preventing, deterring, and prosecuting election fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process. Reforms intended to ensure election integrity do not disenfranchise voters and, in fact, protect their right to vote.

[Libloather]

1,302 Proven instances of voter fraud
1,125 Criminal convictions
48 Civil penalties
95 Diversion program
17 Judicial finding
17 Official finding

I'm just trying to figure out an acceptable amount that RATS will tolerate before the whining begins. Apparently the fraud can flow with hardly anyone going to prison.

[Diogenesis]

American People await JUSTICE and Truth
while the DO”J” practices endless sedition,
and the FIB’s ONLY interest is threatening witnesses
as the USA goes down to ChInA and MI-6.

[ThePatriotsFlag]

These are all Democrat frauds, where are the Republican instances of fraud?

[Robert DeLong]

Pa. has 0 for the year 2020. I would say this DB is as useless as teats on a boar hog.

[Blood of Tyrants]

But the thing about it is that it’s a law without teeth. Most people get away with a suspended sentence or probation and at most a small fine of less than $500. Now if the ante were upped to a MANDATORY one year in jail and a felony conviction, it might stop most of it.