Bringing Occam’s Razor to the question of voting machines: The mere fact that they’re so complicated suggests the election fraud problems we now face

American Thinker ^ | 11/30/2020 | Andrea Widburg

[SeekAndFind]

A few days ago, someone sent me an article from Mark St. Cyr that I’ve been brooding about ever since. That's because St. Cyr asks one simple question: Why voting machines are so complicated? Looked at from an Occam’s Razor perspective, they should be simple devices – yet Dominion and ES&S have systems so complicated that they not only count votes, they also prepare a six-course meal for 20 after the voting ends. That fact alone shows that they were designed to do a lot more than tally votes, and the “lot more” almost certainly includes nefarious activity.

We’ve heard from multiple sources that the voting systems are incredibly complicated machines that perform an extraordinary number of functions. Ron, who posts on Twitter under @CodeMonkeyZ, took the time to read the entire Dominion handbook and was stunned by what that machine can do. This funky video summarizes some of Ron’s more interesting tweets:

[redfreedom]

The fact that they are so complicated is what befuddled me to begin with.

Seriously, the only software needed is whatever it takes to scan a ballot, recognize the persons voted for, and then calculate the totals with the ability to format the totals in a usable form and print it out.

To go beyond this, such as connection to a computer, would enable hacking and manipulation.

[Red Badger]

ALL ELECTRONIC AND MECHANICAL VOTING and COUNTING MACHINES SHOULD BE OUTLAWED IN THE USA..........Without exception.....................

[Pollard]

I remember taking bubble tests once a year in school in the 70s. They had some sort of machine that would tally them even back then.

Any computerized voting machine should be simple and open source so that everyone can read the source code. It should also be done in a programming language that does not require compiling.

[ptsal]

A simple tabulation task made complicated.

Three card monty with a touch screen. Bring back the abacus.

[1Old Pro]

If the voting fraud is ignored, America is finished. If the corrupt media and education monopolies are not fixed, America is over.

[tbw2]

Dominion’s chief engineer bragged he wouldn’t let Trump win. At a company that has close personal ties to Pelosi and donates to Democrats.

[Petrosius]

What is so complicated to solve the problem: “n + 1 = ?”

[Pajamajan]

bttt

[usconservative]

Apply Occam's Razor to the results: The simplest explanation is most often the correct one.

What's the simplest explanation for the "results" we're seeing and the sudden batches of 99% Biden, 1% Trump votes? Answer: Election Fraud.

That's it folks. Occam's Razor proves the answer.

[AndyJackson]

A sophomore in HS could write a 10 line vote counting program in Basic.

You can add a few logic lines to add nothing,

You could further divide the totals per precinct further subdivided into numbered ballot boxes that have clear chain of custody.

Or you could do it by hand in which case advanced five year olds could do it.

[DownInFlames]

So simple a caveman could do it.

[cymbeline]

“If the voting fraud is ignored, America is finished.”

Stalin said “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything”

And the other problem: illegal ballots.

Another problem: allowing non-citizens to vote legally.

[Mr Information]

“Dominion’s chief engineer bragged he wouldn’t let Trump win. At a company that has close personal ties to Pelosi and donates to Democrats.”

There are three accusations in that one sentence, each one disturbing. What I would like to see - and believe would be greatly helpful - would be to have a central database containing all such accusations, together with supporting references including dates (in case something had changed). Also a discussion forum so people could explain the relevance and importance of the accusation - or dispute it. We can’t afford to make unfounded accusations, that would be pounced on by our opponents and harm our credibility.

[tbw2]

Dominion Engineer Told Antifa He’d ‘Made Sure’ Trump Wouldn’t Win, Report Says
Vice President of U.S. Engineering Eric Coomer shared anti-Trump posts online
https://neonnettle.com/news/13250-dominion-engineer-told-antifa-he-d-made-sure-trump-wouldn-t-win-report-says

Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night
https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020

[colorado tanker]

The old “iron maidens” weren’t complicated at all. In fact, they were mostly mechanical and not electrical. For some reason the election bureaucrats hated them. But we got results on election night, not days later.

[Mr Information]

Thanks for the links.

This is what I would like:

The Wikipedia article on the election has sections such as “False claims of fraud” and “Trump’s refusal to concede”. It does have a “Stop the Steal” article, but dismisses this as “a right-wing conspiracy theory”. What I’d like is a positive article - complying with Wikipedia standards but without the bias - an article which would contain all the accusations such as your three. So how can that be done in a way that would be acceptable to them? It would probably have to be watered down, maybe even just the basic data, but at least that would be something - something reliable, something which could be easily found, and something which could be referred to both now and in the future.