Dominion Engineer Told Antifa He’d ‘Made Sure’ Trump Wouldn’t Win, Report Says
Vice President of U.S. Engineering Eric Coomer shared anti-Trump posts online
https://neonnettle.com/news/13250-dominion-engineer-told-antifa-he-d-made-sure-trump-wouldn-t-win-report-says
Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself
Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night
https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020
Thanks for the links.
This is what I would like:
The Wikipedia article on the election has sections such as “False claims of fraud” and “Trump’s refusal to concede”. It does have a “Stop the Steal” article, but dismisses this as “a right-wing conspiracy theory”. What I’d like is a positive article - complying with Wikipedia standards but without the bias - an article which would contain all the accusations such as your three. So how can that be done in a way that would be acceptable to them? It would probably have to be watered down, maybe even just the basic data, but at least that would be something - something reliable, something which could be easily found, and something which could be referred to both now and in the future.