Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia Lawsuit: Witness Testifies About Use of Different Paper For ‘Counterfeit’ Ballots, ‘Watermark Solid Grey Instead of Transparent’ – 100% For Joe Biden
Gateway Pundit ^ | November 27, 2020 | Christina Laila

Posted on 11/27/2020 11:34:10 AM PST by Golden Eagle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: DrewsMum

What makes you the expert? Do only liberal websites count in your book. Take your above the fray attitude somewhere else.


61 posted on 11/27/2020 12:21:37 PM PST by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz487c8Dfhk


62 posted on 11/27/2020 12:23:18 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Thank you, I was close. However, I don’t understand why an affidavit duly witnessed signed and Notarized and the content is about what they personally observed would be hearsay. Sure, if they heard it from someone else, obviously hearsay. You probably know better - I’m going by personal experience that has nothing to with this lawsuit.


63 posted on 11/27/2020 12:24:16 PM PST by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamo nauseated. Also LGBTQxyz nauseated )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

A prosecutor rarely announces his evidence to the public - I don’t see why everyone is expecting Team Trump to show their cards.

Criminals will often compound their crime in order to avoid conviction. Some examples: witness tampering, bribery, destruction of evidence, false alibi, perjury or any number of other forms of obstructing justice.

This is a lot easier to accomplish if the criminal knows exactly what evidence the prosecutor has.

Also, the corollary is true: if a criminal believes there is no evidence or only weak evidence - he may let down his guard and engage in risky behavior.


64 posted on 11/27/2020 12:31:06 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Then there is this...

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=4693880077350992&id=1397525663653133


65 posted on 11/27/2020 12:42:21 PM PST by mazz44 (http://knowledgeofhealth.com/why-animals-age-they-produce-less-vitamin-c-same-for-humans/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: maro
No, hearsay is any statement, offered as proof of the matter asserted, made while the declaring is not testifying at he current trial. The out of court statement is hearsay whether it is contained in a document or related by a different witness. Here is the language of the actual rule, Rule 801(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence:

(c) Hearsay. “Hearsay” means a statement that: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement.

66 posted on 11/27/2020 12:43:13 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Smoking, meet gun ...


67 posted on 11/27/2020 12:52:20 PM PST by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LEFTISTS RUIN EVERYTHIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

WATERMARKS, you say? Hmmm. Seems I’ve heard that somewhere before LOL.

Watermarks, at least for some legal documents like college transcripts, are just one of several features designed to prevent forgeries. Long ago I worked at a college. The paper used to print transcripts was watermarked with the school logo. In addition, there transcript paper was locked in a safe. Besides the logo, an embossed stamp was also applied to any official transcript request.

The school treated this stuff seriously as obviously if ‘fake’ or forged transcripts were treated as real, then the value of actual transcripts could plummet to zero.


68 posted on 11/27/2020 12:59:16 PM PST by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“All of them”

Because they threw away the other 1800 for Trump


69 posted on 11/27/2020 12:59:25 PM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum

Gotcha

70 posted on 11/27/2020 1:04:40 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


71 posted on 11/27/2020 1:06:37 PM PST by bitt (The left gave us 4 years of Pearl Harbor. Now its time to give them Hiroshima.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

It’s hearsay because it is a statement that is not made during the trial or hearing at which it is offered. It was written and signed before the trial, out of court. That makes it hearsay under the definition in Rule 801(c).

The reason affidavits are inadmissible hearsay is, while the affiant is under oath, the judge or jury can’t see or hear the witness testify. Hearing the witness and observing his face and body language is a major part of evaluating a witness’s credibility. Also, an affidavit cannot be cross-examined.

Again, affidavits can be used in many pre-trial proceedings, such as a motion for summary judgment where the only issue is whether a party has some evidence and the judge is not required to weigh its credibility. But they generally, with some exceptions. can’t be used at trial or at an evidentiary hearing where the judge or a jury has to weigh the evidence and make findings of fact.


72 posted on 11/27/2020 1:11:59 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum

I believe by law they have to maintain the ballots for 2 years. Lets see the ballots !


73 posted on 11/27/2020 1:17:28 PM PST by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

(e)(1) says that it is no longer hearsay if the witness testifies at trial.


74 posted on 11/27/2020 1:17:32 PM PST by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; SE Mom; LilFarmer
https://valdostatoday.com/news-2/region/2020/05/over-one-million-absentee-ballots-distributed-to-ga/

Over one million absentee ballots distributed to GA

May 8, 2020

(ATLANTA)-Georgia election officials, working with Dominion Voting and Runbeck Election Services, have sent more than one million absentee ballots to Georgia voters for the June 9 primary election. The new development underscores the speed and efficiency with which county election officials are processing absentee ballot requests and the excellent work of the mail vendors and the U.S. Postal Service to get the ballots in the mail and delivered to voters.

https://runbeck.net/over-1-million-georgia-voters-received-absentee-ballots-for-the-june-primary/

https://runbeck.net/runbeck-quadruples-vote-by-mail-capacity-with-11-new-high-speed-inserters/

For the 2020 general election, Runbeck’s vote-by-mail services and other election products and technology will reach more than 70 million voters in over 21 states and the District of Columbia—more than one third of the estimated number of registered voters in the United States.

https://runbeck.net/runbeck-quadruples-vote-by-mail-capacity-with-11-new-high-speed-inserters/

Phoenix, Arizona (August 31, 2020) – Runbeck Election Services (Runbeck), an elections services company focused on delivering election printing, equipment and software solutions, announced it has installed 11 new BB700 S2 high-speed inserters adding to the five inserters currently in operation. With this additional equipment, Runbeck now has the ability to manufacture 1.5 million ballot packets each day. In comparison to the 3.8 million ballot packets produced for the 2016 general election, Runbeck estimates they will print and mail 15 million ballot packets for the 2020 general election.

“We have been planning operations for the 2020 election for several years. When the coronavirus pandemic began to hit the United States, we foresaw the increased need for vote-by-mail and immediately placed the order to purchase additional inserters from W+D North America,” said Jeff Ellington, President and COO at Runbeck. “The 11 new inserters are successfully installed, and we stand ready to execute our operations for the general election.”

https://www.linkedin.com/company/winkler-dunnebier-machinery-company

W+D North America Inc.
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
Lenexa, Kansas

Envelope direct mail converting, inserting and printing - POEM | Buhrs | FL Smithe | Halm

About us
Winkler + Dünnebier GmbH (W+D) is a German based engineer and manufacturer of converting, packing automation and printing technology (inkjet, offset and flexo) for the paper, paperboard, tissue, envelope, packaging and securities markets.

The world headquarters for W+D is located about one hour from Frankfurt, Germany in the town of Neuwied. W+D is the largest supplier of envelope converting, printing and inserting solutions in the mail market. W+D is a Barry Wehmiller group company.

W+D North America Inc. in Lenexa, Kansas is the sales, parts, service and technical support organization owned by W+D GmbH which manages the U.S. and Canadian markets.

https://news.yahoo.com/bluecrest-runbeck-election-services-team-145700050.html

BlueCrest and Runbeck Election Services Team up to Tackle Vote-by-Mail Surge

September 23, 2020

With the expansion of Vote-by-Mail during the global coronavirus pandemic, BlueCrest and Runbeck Election Services have teamed up to help their clients meet the surge in mail-in ballot printing, inserting, and sorting.

Runbeck expanded its Vote-by-Mail operations in 2006 when Arizona decided to provide greater access to mail voting for its constituents. Since then, Runbeck has steadily built its equipment footprint to include the BlueCrest Vantage Sorter with new Mixed Mail Stackers. In anticipation of the 2020 election, Runbeck’s upgrade to the Vantage Sorter by BlueCrest increased their output from 24,000 pieces-per-hour to 50,000 pieces-per-hour, all while reducing the footprint of the machinery.

“With the increase in demand for mail ballots this year, we decided to bring in the Vantage with Mixed Mail Stackers by BlueCrest a year earlier than we planned in order to get the extra power we needed to get through the November election,”

75 posted on 11/27/2020 1:19:34 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: maggief

This is very interesting, thanks for posting.

When my FIL was going to vote on Nov 3, we had a rough time getting an absentee ballot mailed to him. The elections director for my county said the ballots were coming from AZ and had no tracking numbers.

We did finally get the ballot but barely in time for him to vote.


76 posted on 11/27/2020 1:22:46 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I understand Lin Woods is asking for Military personel to come forward and witness that are from Fulton County.
If you KNOW someone from there that voted for Trump.... contact them if at all possible!!!!


77 posted on 11/27/2020 1:26:27 PM PST by pollywog (" O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

“ saw” is not good enough
Need to actually produce the evidence


78 posted on 11/27/2020 1:49:26 PM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maro

Former (e)(1) (now 801(d)(1)) only allows the use of a witness’s prior statements to impeach the witness or to rebut impeachment or to rehabilitate the witness after impeachment. It does not allow the use of the witness’s prior statements generally.


79 posted on 11/27/2020 2:14:32 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Thanks! I may be naive but it would seem an easy, though tedious, task to find what candidate these “extra” paper ballots went to.

If all 900 military ballots in Fulton County were “for Biden”- I swear anything is possible. The likelihood of that is damn close to zero.


80 posted on 11/27/2020 2:15:13 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson