Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: maro

Former (e)(1) (now 801(d)(1)) only allows the use of a witness’s prior statements to impeach the witness or to rebut impeachment or to rehabilitate the witness after impeachment. It does not allow the use of the witness’s prior statements generally.


79 posted on 11/27/2020 2:14:32 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight

Good points, but doesn’t it depend on what the affidavit’s purpose is? Under Rule 54 practice, it is common to use affidavits.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/trial-evidence/practice/2019/third-party-affidavit-statements-admissible/

The affidavits attached to to complaint in this case are being used to defeat a summary dismissal by showing that there are facts to be developed at trial.


83 posted on 11/27/2020 3:20:12 PM PST by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson