Posted on 11/19/2020 6:34:21 PM PST by MNDude
Its 4 and a half minutes long. He sure implies she's not honest.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
adamantly
The only thing they need to prove is that the states violated federal law by receiving ballots after election day, changing what the legislature had written. They broke federal law. The ballots will be considered invalid.
Tucker = Snail fart
Did you hear that?
Thanks.
For some reason, I’ve lately developed an aversion to following links.
I appreciate your information.
“Time for him to dig out that old bow tie and start wearing it.”
________________________________________
Omgosh.
Salvey, wait until I tell my beloved husband about your comment!
He swears he’s never trusted Tucker because of his ‘bow tie’ days. I think my husband told me Tucker wore pink.....? Can’t swear to that colour, though. I recall he was just and I mean JUST starting to give Tucker any trust and this happened. Calls him a Whiny, white toast weak kneed republican. And that’s the good title. I don’t want to sully FR with his *official* opinion of Tucker.
Berlin, I saw YouTube Videos 6 years ago about machines changing votes...
I don’t know about UFOS, but machine’s that can change votes are very believable.
They will do so in court.
Book marked! And I guarantee they’ll win! And I’m thinking military and tribunals instead😎
“okey dokey...alrighty then.....”
___________________________
Now, see?
You provided your emotional opinion of my comment and I’m perfectly fine with it. An emotional response is as acceptable as any other response.
We’re good. :)
I have been saying for the longest time this turns on Con law.
The prove it statement is about Dominion..not the Con law issue.
PA is the best hope for that. Maybe GA but I am more familiar with what happened in PA
Well...I hope you are right because President Harris is just going to make the next 4 years unbearable..more so than Obama.
https://thepostmillennial.com/trump-lawyers-allege-massive-fraud-in-major-press-conference
Scroll down to Sidney Powell speaking.
“Dont be stupid.”
________________
Now, there we go, again.
Emotional responses are welcome and acceptable. I’m personally interested in your mindset; it’s ‘interesting,’ to say the least.
Correct me: Did you not early take offense with someone because his elected to value his own opinion over yours? You got a bit emotionally touching about that, as a matter of point.
You are, however, getting better at OWNING your opinions to the degree you are exhibiting traits you besmirched just earlier on this thread.
I’d say you’re coming along quite nicely.
Open discussion of differing opinions is always welcome on this particular site. It’s probably the number reason I frequent site.
Oh. Also, learning trivia! For example, I binged Tucker Carlson and Swanson because my interest was piqued from an earlier comment. I don’t recall knowing earlier about his coming from wealth, even if it was by way of marriage. Nice bit of informational pick-up.
You sound like Quix.
“The country needs answers. The accusations has divided the country.”
The country does need answers, open, honest and a transparent disclosure. It cannot survive without it. This is the most important precipice we have ever faced.
But, “you are dead damn wrong” that the “accusations have divided the country”.
The country was divided with 8 years of the “o’joke”, followed by 5 years of unrelenting chastising, harassment and treason by the left of our duly elected 45th President. You forgot deplorables, irredeemables and worse?
Let the process unfold. For if it does not and the results are not honest and accepted, there will be nothing to save.
I’m sure Powell has many reasons not to show her hand, but even a layman should know that publicly identifying witnesses could lead to intimidation and possibly the loss of those witnesses. Why give the opposition a free shot at them?
I like Carlson, but every now and then he says something boneheaded.
The President told her not to go.The end.
“that is the point”
_______________
A bit fuzzy what your ‘point’ of “that is the point,” is at this time.
If I read correctly, you believe Dominion should sue.
Dominion suing anyone is not going to happen. Dominion does not want to have to reply to anything in any legal way. I would imagine their internal documents alone would provide much in the way of assisting towards a conviction against those in Dominion and those who paid for it’s services, both democrats and republicans. Maybe, just maybe, even an odd Independent or Libertarian candidate. Although, there are so very few Libertarian candidates out there.....
Thank you for the other FR link. I did read it; albeit, earlier. I tend to open every FR thread as I like to track both subjects and respondents. I encourage you, though, RummyChick to continue to point out FR threads you find personally interesting!
“You sound like Quix.”
____________________
Hi, fatima- :)
Who or what is a Quix? LOL
Good? Bad? Indifferent?
Can I Bing him/her/it for clarification?
And, will it eat me for dinner if it finds me? LOL
That point of so many people here saying Dominion should sue is:
1. If they don’t, why aren’t they
2. Open their company up to interrogatories, etc.
3. they have a case...if everything is on the up and up. So sue.
Karl Rove likely was saying sue for a different reason..as in Trump and crew are liars so sue their ass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.