Posted on 11/19/2020 6:55:47 AM PST by PK1991
Ramsland states: These systems contain a large number of vulnerabilities .. . These vulnerabilities are well known, and experts in the field have written extensively about them. 1) "Based on the significant anomalies and red flags that we have observed, we believe there is a significant probability that election results have been manipulated within the Dominion/Premier system in Michigan." 2) Atrium County 6,000 vote glitch "The problem most likely did occur due to a glitch where an update file didn't properly synchronize the ballot barcode generation and reading portions of the system. If that is indeed the case, there is no reason to assume this would be an isolated error." 3) "The number of votes cast compared to the number of voters in some precincts. A preliminary analysis using data obtained from the Michigan Secretary of State pinpoints a statistical anomaly so far outside of every statistical norm as to be virtually impossible. There are a stunning 3,276 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters based on Reported Statistics ranges from 84% to 350%." 4) "The dramatic shift in votes between the two major party candidates as the tabulation of the turnout increased. A significant irregularity surfaces. Until the tabulated voter turnout reached approximately 83%, Trump was generally winning between 55% and 60% of every turnout point. Then, after the counting was closed at 2:00 am, the situation dramatically reversed itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes shortly after counting was supposed to have stopped. The several spikes cast solely for Biden could easily be produced in the Dominion system by pre-loading batches of blank ballots in files such as Write-Ins, then casting them all for Biden using the Override Procedure." 5)"Something occurred in Michigan that is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night within the EMS. The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the equipment available."
Yes, it’s obvious some signal was sent to tell the states to stop counting. Great thought to look for that signal right out in the open.
This rodeo has a long way to go.
Can I share this?
They likely wiped the access logs. This is all circumstantial evidence. Sorry, but we need a confession. “I did it.” Not likely to happen.
And the “powers that be” are all 😴😴😴😴😴😴😴
Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?Which is the 5th point?
We don’t need proof of fraud, per se. I really can’t see how you can certify election results with what is clear numerical proof of impossibility of tallies and technological proof of impossibility of counting rates.
THis is plenty enough to get the additional discovery that is requested in the affadavit.
I don’t understand the list of 100% turnout precints near the end of the article. Talking about Wayne County and the list of precinct names look like NW Minnesota, not Michigan.
The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the equipment available.”
Everyone wants a smoking gun, well there it is.
The 5th point is that there were about 400,000 votes counted in one 2-1/2 period, whereas the machines are only physically/technologically able to process about 100,000 max in that time period, even including paper jams and whatnot.
The assumption is being made that every single update represents the real-time counting of ballots.
What happens is that ballots are scanned, results from each scanner are recorded on a memory card, then memory cards are read and uploaded into the results tabulator server.
You don’t remove the memory card until you have finished scanning all of your ballots. So several memory cards get uploaded together in a batch, after hours of scanning.
This analysis of the count on its own does not prove anything.
“All this affidavit shows is that there was the opportunity for fraud. No actual proof of fraud.“
#5 lays out how vote spikes for biden could not have been done in the given time period. In other words, biden votes came in faster than ballots could be put through the machine.
#5 is literally a smoking gun, but I guess there will always be people who believe the gun is smoking due to cold weather not due to the gun being discharged......
My first thought that night . It was some kind of signal—-possibly an order to execute when it appeared likely Trump votes were massive.
Read my post #31 above.
Sure it is a public document.
The affidavit seems to suggest that it was a 2-1/2 hour time period of counting, not time period in between uploads. I’ll have to re-read this sucker.
A large part of the affidavit is requesting access to equipment to examine them. This would support requesting the court allowing experts to examine the equipment.
The filing includes the names of the precincts. You need data to make these assertions. Ramsland has the data.
We know which machines these came from down to the serial number. Which means we know the times their memory cards were uploaded. Which means we know the last time that machine uploaded and the next time that machine uploaded. Therefore we have the duration between. Four machine iirc and they all exceed the amount per time allotted. And this is even not accounting for any troubles during running the ballots (paper jams, unable to read, ect.)
The way some people on this site talk, you would think that nobody would ever get convicted of a crime, unless they were caught on camera....”this is all just circumstantial”....” this will never hold up in court”..... I get the fact that we are all paranoid about not trusting anyone in government to do right by Trump, and therefore, wishing for a smoking gun that serves as undeniable proof.....but long before there were cellphones and security cameras, detectives were able to gather enough evidence to convict all kinds of criminals, without anything close to a smoking gun.....people here are so pessimistic, they’ve lost all sight of how the criminal justice system has always worked
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.