Russell Ramsland affidavit (in lin wood filing) provides proof of election fraud in Michigan…

Ramsland states: "I am part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC, (ASOG). ASOG provides a range of security services, but has a particular emphasis on cyber security, OSI NT and PEN testing of networks [he then describes his experience examining election systems such as the Dominion Systems used in Michigan] He states: "These systems contain a large number of vulnerabilities to hacking and tampering, both at the front end where Americans cast their votes, and at the back end where the votes are stored, tabulated, and reported. These vulnerabilities are well known, and experts in the field have written extensively about them." As to fraud with the system in this election he concludes: 1) "My colleagues and I at ASOG have studied the information that is publicly available concerning the November 3, 2020, election results. Based on the significant anomalies and red flags that we have observed, we believe there is a significant probability that election results have been manipulated within the Dominion/Premier system in Michigan." 2) with respect to the Atrium County voting glich "It is our belief (based on the information we have at this point) that the problem most likely did occur due to a glitch where an update file didn't properly synchronize the ballot barcode generation and reading portions of the system. If that is indeed the case, there is no reason to assume this would be an isolated error. This glitch would cause entire ballot uploads to read as zero in the tabulation batch, which we also observed happening in the data (provisional ballots were accepted properly but in-person ballots were being rejected ( zeroed out and/ or changed (flipped)). Because of the highly vulnerable nature of these systems to error and exploits, it is quite possible that some, or all of these other counties may have the same problem." 3) "Another statistical red flag is evident in the number of votes cast compared to the number of voters in some precincts. A preliminary analysis using data obtained from the Michigan Secretary of State pinpoints a statistical anomaly so far outside of every statistical norm as to be virtually impossible. There are a stunning 3,276 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters based on Reported Statistics ranges from 84% to 350%. Normalizing the Turnout Percentage of this grouping to 80%, (still way above the national average for turnout percentage), reveals 431,954 excess ballots allegedly processed." 4)"Yet another statistical red flag in Michigan concerns the dramatic shift in votes between the two major party candidates as the tabulation of the turnout increased. A significant irregularity surfaces. Until the tabulated voter turnout reached approximately 83%, Trump was generally winning between 55% and 60% of every turnout point. Then, after the counting was closed at 2:00 am, the situation dramatically reversed itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes shortly after counting was supposed to have stopped. The several spikes cast solely for Biden could easily be produced in the Dominion system by pre-loading batches of blank ballots in files such as Write-Ins, then casting them all for Biden using the Override Procedure (to cast Write-In ballots) that is available to the operator of the system. A few batches of blank ballots could easily produce a reversal this extreme, a reversal that is almost as statistically difficult to explain as is the impossibility of the votes cast to number of voters described in Paragraph 11 above." 5)"The final red flag is perhaps the greatest. Something occurred in Michigan that is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night within the EMS. The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the equipment available at the 4 reference locations (precincts/townships) we looked at for processing ballots, and cross referencing that with both the time it took at each location and the performance specifications we obtained using the serial numbers of the scanning devices used. (Model DRM16011 - 60/min. without accounting for paper jams, replacement cover sheets or loading time, so we assume 2,000 ballots/hr. in field conditions which is probably generous)."

I hope Team Trump has something better than just affidavits from randoms whom weren’t in any way witnesses or involved...

These are statistical analyses and I hope they come up with something more than this.

Yes. This narrative must be used in concert with system logs from actual voting in actual states.

Obviously the only explanation is that they were Magic Machines.

Arlen Specter would approve of this message

That 5th point is the biggie.

Thanks for posting.

5)”The final red flag is perhaps the greatest. Something occurred in Michigan that is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night within the EMS.

The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes.

This is physically impossible given the equipment available at the 4 reference locations (precincts/townships) we looked at for processing ballots, and cross referencing that with both the time it took at each location and the performance specifications we obtained using the serial numbers of the scanning devices used. (Model DRM16011 - 60/min. without accounting for paper jams, replacement cover sheets or loading time, so we assume 2,000 ballots/hr. in field conditions which is probably generous).”

The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the equipment available."

This should be provable and is something more tangible than statistical anomalies.

Ramsland states: "I am part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC, (ASOG). ASOG provides a range of security services, but has a particular emphasis on cyber security, OSI NT and PEN testing of networks [he then describes his experience examining election systems such as the Dominion Systems used in Michigan]

He states: "These systems contain a large number of vulnerabilities to hacking and tampering, both at the front end where Americans cast their votes, and at the back end where the votes are stored, tabulated, and reported. These vulnerabilities are well known, and experts in the field have written extensively about them." As to fraud with the system in this election he concludes:

1) "My colleagues and I at ASOG have studied the information that is publicly available concerning the November 3, 2020, election results. Based on the significant anomalies and red flags that we have observed, we believe there is a significant probability that election results have been manipulated within the Dominion/Premier system in Michigan."

2) with respect to the Atrium County voting glich "It is our belief (based on the information we have at this point) that the problem most likely did occur due to a glitch where an update file didn't properly synchronize the ballot barcode generation and reading portions of the system. If that is indeed the case, there is no reason to assume this would be an isolated error. This glitch would cause entire ballot uploads to read as zero in the tabulation batch, which we also observed happening in the data (provisional ballots were accepted properly but in-person ballots were being rejected ( zeroed out and/ or changed (flipped)). Because of the highly vulnerable nature of these systems to error and exploits, it is quite possible that some, or all of these other counties may have the same problem."

3) "Another statistical red flag is evident in the number of votes cast compared to the number of voters in some precincts. A preliminary analysis using data obtained from the Michigan Secretary of State pinpoints a statistical anomaly so far outside of every statistical norm as to be virtually impossible. There are a stunning 3,276 precincts where the Presidential Votes Cast compared to the Estimated Voters based on Reported Statistics ranges from 84% to 350%. Normalizing the Turnout Percentage of this grouping to 80%, (still way above the national average for turnout percentage), reveals 431,954 excess ballots allegedly processed."

4)"Yet another statistical red flag in Michigan concerns the dramatic shift in votes between the two major party candidates as the tabulation of the turnout increased. A significant irregularity surfaces. Until the tabulated voter turnout reached approximately 83%, Trump was generally winning between 55% and 60% of every turnout point. Then, after the counting was closed at 2:00 am, the situation dramatically reversed itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes shortly after counting was supposed to have stopped. The several spikes cast solely for Biden could easily be produced in the Dominion system by pre-loading batches of blank ballots in files such as Write-Ins, then casting them all for Biden using the Override Procedure (to cast Write-In ballots) that is available to the operator of the system. A few batches of blank ballots could easily produce a reversal this extreme, a reversal that is almost as statistically difficult to explain as is the impossibility of the votes cast to number of voters described in Paragraph 11 above."

5)"The final red flag is perhaps the greatest. Something occurred in Michigan that is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night within the EMS. The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the equipment available at the 4 reference locations (precincts/townships) we looked at for processing ballots, and cross referencing that with both the time it took at each location and the performance specifications we obtained using the serial numbers of the scanning devices used. (Model DRM16011 - 60/min. without accounting for paper jams, replacement cover sheets or loading time, so we assume 2,000 ballots/hr. in field conditions which is probably generous)."

Was FOXs early, bizarre, aberrant call of AZ a signal to start the cheat for Biden? (Crazy vanity)

The call of Arizona, by Fox, when made (9:20pm AZ time I believe) was so outrageous, so premature, so stunning that everyone was caught off guard and shocked by it. Could the call of AZ have been a benign, right-out-in-the-open way that the domestic and international fraudsters could easily see it and know what it meant (start the steal) while the rest of us were caught flatfooted, scratching our heads over it?

The tables showing 100% turnout are pretty impressive, too!

Holy cow. I haven’t read the whole thing, but just the tables of turnout are crazy. And almost 300,000 votes too many to be able to be processed in a given time period? I want to say the “B” word, lol.

All this affidavit shows is that there was the opportunity for fraud. No actual proof of fraud.

Unless and until we see Admin Logs showing that vote totals were modified from a keyboard instead of being input by scanning machines, all this will ever show is that there was potential for fraud, and that stronger safeguards need to be implemented.

But nothing in this affidavit provides enough proof to a judge to overturn the election.

"Your honor, the front door was unlocked. Therefore the defendant robbed the house."

But the Media hates Trump and wants Biden to win.

If 350% of voters in precincts vote isn’t enough proof of fraud, then 138,000 boots for Biden being entered into the system after the poll workers were sent home for the night at a rate faster than the scanners could physically have been scanned if the poll workers were there to scan them should do the trick.

If it doesn’t, I really cannot imagine any any evidence that could. Both are physically impossible.

.

Very interesting document.

I've been wondering about this. Sure enough, they processed FAR MORE ballots than their voting machines could possibly process in the limited amount of time available. That should be HUGE evidence of manufactured, illegal votes.

That reminds me so much of the great sleuth work that showed the required bandwidth made it impossible for actors outside the US to have exfiltrated the DNC server contents back in 2016. That analysis showed that it had to be an inside job by somebody with physical access to the machines.

It is the same in this analysis.

Bttt.

5.56mm

Then they would argue that the computer logs were falsified to show fraud, not that the election itself was fraudulent.

I’m surprised to hear NO discussion of the log files. NONE at all. That is most definitely the key. If the machines were not physically impounded with highly secure access, the log files have probably been wiped.