The “stop count” was a head fake to throw the R’s off guard.
Even Trump fell for it.
I thought at the time it was to give them a chance to retarget their fraud numbers.
Dynamite...! Very well done Laz....
Which is the best, most expeditious way to get this data to Rudy Giuliani?
Bookmarked under FRAUD
...THX LAZ
Thank you so very much.. it’s amazing just how blatant the Democrat’s Election Theft operation was. We all knew it was afoot (the D politicians especially in PA and MI signaled it pretty clearly) but I thought they’d try to keep it as hidden as possible. I was wrong
More on those Dominion machines, https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/11/07/276464-n276464
thanks la saved for later
Cribbing my own response to something on another thread that showed the same results for the Libertarian Party candidate that you are showing on this thread:
The Libertarians ought to be pissed if they lost 45K valid votes. I wonder what they will do.
Today’s Libertarian Party is not the Libertarian Party of Bob Barr (L party candidate in 2008), who would have stood with President Trump and demanded an investigation into the fraudulent loss of votes for the L party, even if it benefited Trump. I am not convinced that Jo Jorgensen would be willing to do anything that benefits Trump even if in so doing it benefits the Libertarian Party.
In many states, automatic ballot access in the next election for the Libertarian Party is dependent on how many votes they got in the previous election.
Otherwise, they have to spend money and time in securing a spot on the ballot in the next election.
Laz.
Have you seen this recent video by Russ Ramsland?
See this thread. See the video.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3903444/posts
It’s an hour long. It’s detail info that you will understand. Yet it’s basic enough so that anyone can understand.
One statistic I was thinking about was voter participation. Compare the rates state by state and from the year 2016 , 2018 , and 2020. Sudden rises in the rate would suggest ballot stuffing or a radical change in the way voting was done such as mail in. To balance out that effect compare state against state to find out which states show tampering.
Remember, my FRiends, that it was just one of our own who, about 16 years ago, exposed a dirty RAT trick perpetrated by Dan Rather.
There are now many tens of thousands of “Buckheads” picking this puzzle apart, piece by piece.
We got this!
Laz you need to get this to the Trump team ALL of it right now I think Sydney Powell is on top of the software General Flynn has completely briefed her on this AND the guy who invented the software is on OUR SIDE!! I am quite sure he is on it, I am seeing several of these state legislators demand an audit of these machines including PA.. What you have put together here is a complete and ORGANIZED synopsis of what happened!!
Thank you so much for this! Well done and I’m able to convey it to someone I know who is skeptical. With the media/big tech black out, we have to inform all our friends and family with facts. This is excellent.
I have audio and video proof that there was an organized effort to fix the ballots that were incomplete.
I attended a webinar and took video & audio of one of their meetings.
Saying thank you. Also posting to bookmark this thread to find it again.
Thanks bumping for later read
from thedonald.win:
Here’s the idea:
People on the left are now claiming that elections (since towns start with a finite size, the counting doesn’t start at 0) don’t follow Benford’s Law, that you have to “normalize” the data. And once you do, Biden totals look real.
I have a PhD a VERY hard science (quantum mechanics). So I follow Dick Feynman’s Law, “It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.”
Here’s my idea. It doesn’t involve normalizing or anything.
Let’s use REAL ELECTION DATA from this election.
Separate out Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, and Nevada. Put them aside for a moment.
Do Benford’s Law for each and every other state in the country, one state at a time. For Dems, Trump, and Libertardtarian. That automatically removes any second-guessing about “assumptions” or “models”.
But that’s just the first step.
Do it at 9PM election day. Do it at 7AM Nov.4 (for both the total, and for just the late votes). Do it at 7AM Nov.5 (for both the total, and for just the late votes). Do it at 7AM Nov.6 (for both the total, and for just the late votes).
Then do the same thing, for the US Senate race in each case.
This will show
a) if Benford’s Law holds for THIS election without normalizing. b) if Benford’s Law suddenly changes with new votes c) if Benford’s Law holds for the Senate but not the Presidency.
Then do the same thing for each of the supposed Dem Fraud States.
And you have an unmassaged, real-time, control group...on THIS election, so there’s no apples to oranges.
ANY TAKERS?
(Someone get this to the datacrunchers behind the Trump team, please!)
need to focus on the RED districts, precincts and counties.
This guy explains it very clearly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuFRLEYbDg
watch it all
Even RED STATES and RED Districts require an AUDIT-not a recount
they’re banking on none of us looking too hard in the RED
If all for real, and I have no doubt that it is, what can be done about it? Can it be proven? Without proof, it’ll go nowhere. Can we assume that Trump/Pence/Rudy, et al. are on to this? And, again, what can be proven?
This gives me hope. Thank you for what you do Laz.