Posted on 09/19/2020 12:38:25 PM PDT by KamalaKancel
This post updates research results (thus far) by KamalaKancel (Twitter ID). Document excerpts (which substantiate this narrative) will continue to be posted at: KamalaKancelTwitterLink
Questions are being asked whether Kamala Harris is eligible to be a candidate for Vice President of the USA, per the terms and requirements of the 12th and 25th Amendments of the US Constitution.
An appropriate context of this discussion must note that gratuitous amounts of misinformation have been featured in tactics leading up to the US federal elections of 2020. As the electorate is asked to make an informed choice, what is needed is simple facts that are plainly told, and actually true.
Research has been conducted, and based on results to date we can now ask:
Did Shyamala Harris, native of India, mother of candidate Kamala Harris, abuse US policies for her own benefit?
As a foreign national, Shyamala gained entry to the USA by stating that her interest was academic. However, during the term of her student "F" visa, she reportedly escaped an arranged marriage in India by instead marrying the holder of another foreign national student "F" visa holder. Then, after receiving her PhD in January 1964, she quickly became pregnant. Just before the scheduled October 1, 1964 expiration of her student visa, she filed for a further “loophole” extension on the basis of (paid) training as a Postgraduate Research Physiologist at UC Berkeley. Under this latest extension, Shyamala did not return to India but instead bore a child on US territory on October 20, 1964. Whatever her motivations were, these acts represented more than personal dishonesty, and were in fact a breach of the public’s faith. The original intent of the student visa program was a post-WWI desire for lasting international peace through educational exchange (intended to result in greater understanding between nations), rather than use as a "back door" for schemes for immigration to the US.
Following the expiration of her student visa, rather than gaining legal naturalization to the US, Shyamala extended her stay within the US by applying for and receiving an "H-1" "skilled labor" visa. This not only allowed her to care for her child on US territory but to also displace the employment (at prevailing wage rates) of other university-educated native-born US citizens from positions available for a research physiologist. (The “H-1” program is still in existence today, and its continued exploitation by many other immigrants from India has resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of middle and upper-class jobs among US citizens). The exploitation did not end there: Shyamala filed another petition to remain in the US on January 10, 1967, just before the birth of her second child, Maya, on January 30, 1967.
Did Shyamala Harris continue her exploitation of US policies?
After enjoying benefits of US residency and a taxpayer-funded public university education followed by government employment and public schooling of her daughters, Shyamala chose to remain a foreign national on an Immigrant Visa and not to complete steps to become a citizen of the United States. It is uncertain if this was for financial reasons, as she maintained bank accounts within the US, as well as an interest in an offshore account in the Bahamas. She also arranged for regular child support payments as part of a settlement for divorce in mid-1973, but moved quickly to escape mutually-agreed weekend/holiday child visitation schedules by applying to relocate to Canada in late 1975. Shyamala abandoned her US alien-residency status on Oct. 27, 1976, while continuing to hold a passport from India, then after 7- seven years in Montreal she obtained a separate passport from Canada (while stating that she resided in Oakland, CA).
Was Kamala Harris sufficiently influenced by her mother to be a willing participant in immigration policy abuse?
Kamala did not hesitate to participate in another “back door” process for re-admission of her mother to the US, as she signed a petition just 5 five days after celebrating her 21st birthday. Kamala’s "anchor baby" status is not conjecture, but was in fact cited in documents from her mother who stated she wanted to re-enter the US for an intended residence in Oakland, CA (although Kamala was at the time attending university in the District of Columbia). More pertinent to her 2020 candidacy is that in this process and as an adult, Kamala declared her US citizenship as being based on "birth in the US" and not "through parents" in a sworn petition. Could this be interpreted as a legal admission that Kamala Harris is not a “natural born” citizen of the US (as is required for a Vice-President)?
Will the story end here?
One narrative could emerge, that straight-ticket Democratic voters should be warned their votes for Harris may not count!! Legal implications of available records may apply to eligibility for ballots, the Electoral College, and related court filings. Additional questions for the public record also exist regarding discrepancies in the varying names of Harris family members that appear in official records, discrepancies in the claims of racial status of the Harris family, and discrepancies in the statements of claims of nationality, as well as other files that have yet to be released to the public.
Kumela isn’t eligible.
So you signed up three days ago in order to promote your Twitter account?
Media will ignore it saying it’s unimportant or just ignore it entirely by not reporting anything about it.
Legal Anchor Baby Heels Up Harris...
Kumela...the pass around.
Ugh. This is weak, and it’s not going anywhere.
Legal Anchor Baby Heels Up Harris...
_________________________________
Not sure what this means. To be a natural born citizen you have to be born to US citizens. Her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth.
Uh, oh. All Hidey/Ho votes get tossed?
Damn, and me thinking it is Sept now.
“she quickly became pregnant.”
How would a woman slowly become pregnant?
Crumsmella and her mother are aliens scamming our systems for decades.
Toss them both out on their pointy heads
A guy into foreplay that also has slow sperm ?
Time zones.
Legal Anchor Baby Heels Up Harris...
_________________________________
Not sure what this means. To be a natural born citizen you have to be born to US citizens. Her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth.
Legal Anchor Baby, her parents were here Legally.
Illegal Anchor Baby, her parents were not here legally.
I thought using the term Anchor Baby would clue people into the fact that she is OBVIOUSLY NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
I guess I was wrong... #;^)
Article II
Section 1
Clause 5
US Constitution
“It’s too convenient”, like the “unplanned” Wuhan virus.
Natural Born Citizen = both parents are citizens, and born on American soil. She is not eligible.
Means nothing to the subversives.
Just like Obama, who's father never became a citizen (Or ever intended to AFAIK)
The precedent has been established. The Natural Born Citizen thing will never matter again. If the country takes a left turn, citizenship itself won't matter at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.