[sicsempertyrannisDenver]

Remember the feminists demanding the “end of male privilege and urinals”, and “potty-parity”, and “gender neutral” or some such nonsense? Looks like they’ve found a path to that through CCP-Virus

[a fool in paradise]

Houston has so-called potty parity and it doesn’t mean equal number of facilities for men and women. It means 2:1 ratio for women to men.

[GotMojo]

Bring back the trough!

[a fool in paradise]

And women laugh at men when they see them in long lines at sports stadiums.

[Bommer]

DO IT, I’ll pee all day with the seat down! Piss on them and their seats!!!!

[SpaceBar]

If urinals were a health problem, the Romans would have known about it.

[escapefromboston]

Urinals are probably more hygienic. You’re not really touching anything (unlike siting on a toilet). Though I do prefer the motion activated sensors. The only real danger with urinals is the occasional splash back.

[ameribbean expat]

https://twitter.com/DGPurser/status/1257997156251811841?s=19

[MinorityRepublican]

Get a rip. We will survive this virus just like we’ve survived millions of other viruses.

[neverevergiveup]

Well, then men should just choose a wall, en masse.

[Afterguard]

Lol... If it’s a genuinely gender-neutral toilet men will just pee on the seats

[The Pack Knight]

This may be the most retarded coronavirus story I’ve read to date. Urinals are contact-free and require less time spent in the restroom. If anything, they are far less conducive to spreading disease.

Feminists have been pushing to have men sit down to urinate for years for some ludicrous reason.

[lee martell]

I noticed a few stores had locked restrooms this weekend.
I thought it might be a coincident.
If this is a new policy, predict it will soon be reversed.
People are too used to it.

[Wuli]

B.S.

For men, urinals for doing #1 are more sanitary than sit down toilets.

Next home I build will have a urinal and a toilet in every bathroom. There is nothing “sexist” about it, it’s part of sex distinctions, not sex discrimination.

I am sure women in any house that includes urinals will also appreciate the absence of those occasions men who would have otherwise had to urinate at the toilet and might have (a) missed the target, (b) left the seat up, (c) missed the target and left the seat down. A urinal leaves so little chance of “missing the target” and requires no seat to get in the way or have to manipulate. Much cleaner, for men and #1.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

The elites and anti-masculine and anti-American left have been trying to turn men into sitzenpissers for a long time. Never let a crisis go to waste.
 

[Pearls Before Swine]

Everywhere you go, there is nowhere to go. The closure of many public conveniences as part of the coronavirus lockdown is forcing a rethink of the way Britons relieve themselves away from home.

Don't they have streets? Humming "If you're going to San Francisco..." to myself as I type this.

[Skywise]

Umm - urinals ARE hygienic. Moreso than toilets and all the public ones I’ve seen as of late have large dividers between them and have touch less flush systems.

This article was probably written by a woman.

[Carl Vehse]

In the People's Socialist Kakistocracy of Austin, building codes already make it hard to have urinals in new or renovated public or business restrooms, since bathrooms must be equal.

It's surprising that Austin Stadtführer "Adolf" Adler hasn't issued a "sit-down" diktat for all toilet users.

[OrangeHoof]

I stopped at “British Toilet Association”. How would you like that on your business card?

[hanamizu]

The Brits pronounce urinal with a long i...

[goodnesswins]

Isn’t urine fresh from the body sterile?