|
Posted on 05/06/2020 9:14:04 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and information sources we've identified.
Health status of the general population in Russia?
Health status of the general population in China?
Trump says “learned from Nixon, don’t fire anybody.”
Still plenty more swamp to drain, he says.
~~~~~~~~~~
I think he implied more would be coming out about Rod Rosenstein...hmmm, and he didn’t sound positive about Wray
And that’s when we got tossed out of the store for fighting.
==========+=======
LOL! Hot tongue & cold shoulder for dinner?
I think you are on to something.
Without cleaning house (recall that Schiffy was happy?) Grenell would have had to depend on [hold-over] staffers to complete the [DECLAS].
The same situation may be applied to Wray?
He was asked about Wray, but he volunteered "more on Rosenstein."
I got the feeling he is looking at way more than DOJ/FBI, more than Mueller, etc. He's railing onthe fake impeachment now. Pelosi, Schiff are named politician targets.
The swamp is vast indeed.
I think you are both right.
The release of the Rona occurred as PeachMint started up [on schedule].
If Trump had been removed, it would have been “A strain of flu we weren’t prepared for” and “just take normal precautions”.
But, Trump stayed and the Rona impact [scary!] was accelerated.
Even Pelosi tried to sucker Trump into being infected at SOTU.
Agree, although I think Wray is simply a chair-filler, a [placeholder].
A bureaucratic wonk told to just do his job and not “investigate” anything.
He is “future toast”.
Soon.
I’d like to know the name(s) of the DOJ officials that wrote the withdrawal.
Schiffy WASN’T happy.
Sent a letter telling Grenell that his interim status meant he should clean house.
How dare you!
(I go commando)
I said:
“If Trump had been removed, it would have been “A strain of flu we weren’t prepared for” and “just take normal precautions”.”
Additonal thoughts...if trump were removed, Pence would have been neutered. The unwashed masses wouldn’t have accepted his leadership. Where to turn?
Well, well, well.
Look who just sauntered into the room?
Birx and Fauci.
Fresh off a [classified] DNC/WHO sponsored health conference covering pandemics.
Fauci was on record, early out, saying it wasn’t that bad.
...SHOULDN’T clean house...
Day is not starting off well.
Conjunction malfunction.
If they didn’t put the word “Plandemic” in there I would have thought the header was talking about Faux-chi and Burbs.
My criteria about what = science is less rigid & biased.
Anything that can be counted with significant rigor, consistent criteria, balanced perspective, objectivity, proper data collection, proper analyses, proper interpretation etc. is fittingly called science.
Even measuring things with a micrometer, a laser or whatever “hard scientific instrument” has been documented to include a measure of SUBJECTIVITY & OBSERVER PROBLEM.
The whole issue of IS ANYTHING TRULY OBJECTIVE is an interesting “scientific” discussion.
I’ve long thought that “hard scientists’ “ smugness was an arrogant farce due to their tunnel visioned myopia & self-aggrandizing elitism.
Trying out a new tagline (size?)
CBS did it’s best to make it look like Barr was doing Trump’s bidding.
So what if he was?
“Since when is it against the law for the Attorney General to do the President’s bidding?
The President is the President. He is the executive branch. If he could do all the jobs at once, he would, but he can’t. So they created the office of the Attorney General to do it for him. AG is an extension of the President.
Lets not let the derps rewrite the Constitution.”
My point was that the reporter used to work at fox and did good work. The way CBS painted the interview made it look bad.
So I understand why most people don’t get it. Google, Facebook and the rest have most people fooled.
Very frustrating.
I thnk Wray is a snake, worse than a chair-filler. He’s boxed in. Doesn’t have the benefit of being surrounded by reliable protection the way Comey and company were, so was reduced to passive resistance. Stonewall.
The government motion to dismiss is signed by Timothy Shea. I’m sure a team worked on it. Likely a couple weeks of effort there. Then spring it on VanGrack - poof, he withdraws, Team Mueller’s boy is gone, and the “real DOJ” files a motion to dismiss.
It’s one hell of an opening move.
With math, this only and ALWAYS one answer.
Math is never a consensus.
Math proves what is science.
Dang it, Jose, now you have that Thomas Dolby earworm back in my head.
BBL
Sealed indictments are up to 171,541 with 18,921 unsealed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=281307671
“Math is never a consensus.”
Is not 100% accurate in all matters in all contexts in all respects. But my reading on that score is decades old.
Then there’s the old math spoof a math whiz prof did demonstrating that 2 + 2 could = 5. LOL.
I don’t think you understand or appreciate the degree to which PERCEPTION is subjective in the most narrow, strict & rigid scientific contexts.
Then there’s the issue of is electricity a wave or what?
One thing if observed and 180 degrees different if not observed. And THAT’S *HARD* SCIENCE!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
