Posted on 05/05/2020 7:25:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The idea that the worldwide lockdown of virtually every country other than Sweden may have been an enormous mistake strikes many -- including world leaders; most scientists, especially health officials, doctors and epidemiologists; those who work in major news media; opinion writers in those media; and the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people who put their faith in these people -- as so preposterous as to be immoral. Timothy Egan of The New York Times described Republicans who wish to enable their states to open up as "the party of death."
That's the way it is today on planet Earth, where deceit, cowardice and immaturity now dominate almost all societies because the elites are deceitful, cowardly and immature.
But for those open to reading thoughts they may differ with, here is the case for why the worldwide lockdown is not only a mistake but also, possibly, the worst mistake the world has ever made. And for those intellectually challenged by the English language and/or logic, "mistake" and "evil" are not synonyms. The lockdown is a mistake; the Holocaust, slavery, communism, fascism, etc., were evils. Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.
The forcible prevention of Americans from doing anything except what politicians deem "essential" has led to the worst economy in American history since the Great Depression of the 1930s. It is panic and hysteria, not the coronavirus, that created this catastrophe. And the consequences in much of the world will be more horrible than in America.
The United Nations World Food Programme, or the WFP, states that by the end of the year, more than 260 million people will face starvation -- double last year's figures. According to WFP director David Beasley on April 21: "We could be looking at famine in about three dozen countries. ... There is also a real danger that more people could potentially die from the economic impact of COVID-19 than from the virus itself" (italics added).
That would be enough to characterize the worldwide lockdown as a deathly error. But there is much more. If global GDP declines by 5%, another 147 million people could be plunged into extreme poverty, according to the International Food Policy Research Institute.
Foreign Policy magazine reports that, according to the International Monetary Fund, the global economy will shrink by 3% in 2020, marking the biggest downturn since the Great Depression, and the U.S., the eurozone and Japan will contract by 5.9%, 7.5% and 5.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, across South Asia, as of a month ago, tens of millions were already "struggling to put food on the table." Again, all because of the lockdowns, not the virus.
In one particularly incomprehensible act, the government of India, a poor country of 1.3 billion people, locked down its people. As Quartz India reported on April 22, "Coronavirus has killed only around 700 Indians ... a small number still compared to the 450,000 TB and 10,000-odd malaria deaths recorded every year."
One of the thousands of unpaid garment workers protesting the lockdown in Bangladesh understands the situation better than almost any health official in the world: "We are starving. If we don't have food in our stomach, what's the use of observing this lockdown?" But concern for that Bangladeshi worker among the world's elites seems nonexistent.
The lockdown is "possibly even more catastrophic (than the virus) in its outcome: the collapse of global food-supply systems and widespread human starvation" (italics added). That was published in the left-wing The Nation, which, nevertheless, enthusiastically supports lockdowns. But the American left cares as much about the millions of non-Americans reduced to hunger and starvation because of the lockdown as it does about the people of upstate New York who have no incomes, despite the minuscule number of coronavirus deaths there. Or about the citizens of Oregon, whose governor has just announced the state will remain locked down until July 6. As of this writing, a total of 109 people have died of the coronavirus in Oregon.
An example of how disinterested the left is in worldwide suffering is made abundantly clear in a front-page "prayer" by a left-wing Christian in the current issue of The Nation: "May we who are merely inconvenienced remember those whose lives are at stake."
"Merely inconvenienced" is how the Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II, a Protestant minister and president of the North Carolina NAACP, describes the tens of millions of Americans rendered destitute, not to mention the hundreds of millions around the world rendered not only penniless but hungry. The truth is, like most of the elites, it is Barber who is "merely inconvenienced." Indeed, the American battle today is between the merely inconvenienced and the rest of America.
Michael Levitt, professor of structural biology at Stanford Medical School and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in chemistry, recently stated, "There is no doubt in my mind that when we come to look back on this, the damage done by lockdown will exceed any saving of lives by a huge factor."
To the left, anyone who questions the lockdown is driven by preference for money over lives. Typical of the left's moral shallowness is this headline on Salon this week:
"It's Time To Reject the Gods of Commerce: America Is a Society, Not an 'Economy,'" with the subhead reading, "America Is About People, Not Profit Margins."
And, of course, to smug editors and writers of The Atlantic, in article after repetitive article, the fault lies not with the lockdown but with President Donald Trump. The most popular article in The Atlantic this week is titled "The Rest of the World Is Laughing at Trump." The elites can afford to laugh at whatever they want. Meanwhile, the less fortunate -- that is, most people -- are crying.
It’s the stupidest thing human beings have ever done. Bar none. And that’s saying something.
Another deep state coup plot! RUIN TRUMP’s ECONOMY!
Ahhhh - the magic of hindsight....
It’s all about the Rat governors vs the Republican governors now, 25-25 with Mitt.
Eastern and Western CSA Generals Cuomo and Newsome are leading the attack.
Nice job!
All it took was ONE voice of “reason” among ALL OTHERS here!
I’ve just begun to LMFAO @ the fearpers.
So the virus will DISAPPEAR Nov. 4, but good luck with the demented pedophile rapist!!!!
‘Only President Trump can get us out of what we’re in.’
Trump’s influence in this is marginal; he can put pressure on governors, but this will come at a cost to his electability in November...yeah, it’s a lousy deal for him, but that’s what every office-seeker should know could happen...
“The Karens and the Fearpers think that economic armageddon, the end of our republic, and death by disease, poverty, and unrest is worth it because if it saves just one life.”
Just until Nov. 4, when putting a demented pedophile rapist in the White House (again) will make the virus go away and save us all!
The Germans sending Lenin to Russia in 1917 may have been stupider, but this ranks near the top of the list.
It wasn’t “worldwide”...it was just the advanced,civilized,industrialized nation.Red China,for example,didn’t shut down.
Yep, that’s the song that came to mind.
There is a long list of Freepers who fully support the lockdowns.
Thank you!
Have they fired Fauci yet?
“this will come at a cost to his electability in November”
Let’s take a look at what you mean by this statement. My initial impression is you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Yup,
Been Had.
But that was isolated; it wasn't a case of mass stupidity. If I had to guess a close second it might be something like the Children's Crusade, but again, that was relatively isolated.
I supported some of the voluntary measures and some of the mandatory measures (locking down nursing homes) in order to flatten the curve. Now that the curve is flattened I support opening the economy, we need to attempt to resurrect the economy now that we have hospital capacity and plenty of ppe and other medical equipment. The policies of lockdown are now out of hand, too many forgot the original rationale, it's not to save every life, it was to be able to treat people and then take the foot off the neck of our economic engine, the people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.