Posted on 04/10/2020 9:24:26 AM PDT by Steve1999
Attorney General William Barr has revealed that U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation, into the origins of claims of Russian collusion against President Donald Trump, has uncovered evidence "far more troubling" than what could be explained away as "mistakes or sloppiness."AG Barr shed new light on Durhams review of the Russia investigation during an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Thursday night.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
Be still my beating heart.
The odds of me seeing traitor and spook John Brennan publicly hanged for organizing a coup in the United States just went from 0.0001% to 0.001%. Its a start anyway.
Don't get me wrong, I'll be cheering louder than anyone if he actually does something about some big crimes committed by big criminals.
But really, when?
December, 1941 to September, 1945 was about the same time that we've heard all about this.
It's at the point where we should have already seen the bodies of some crooks slowly swinging in the breeze, after the fair trials of course.
Iranian traitors
Iranian traitors
It’s so BAD and happens so often, it can’t be mistakes..
BUT, it doesn’t rise to the level of crimes...
Now go away nothing to see here.
To all of you B I T C H I N G about the pace of this investigation- do you think you could do this job better? And even if you could -So what?
I guess your sole contribution is to bitch and moan and tell us how much gooder (sic) you could do the job.
Iranian traitors
Yawn. Is this a “BOOM”??
The DS plot to unleash COVID on us worked beyond their wildest dreams. Does anybody remember what Barr and Durham were working on?
What she said!
=:-)
Or you BOLT for the exits...
Not as long as deep state Barr is in there. All talk, no action. The only action Barr is interested in, is taking away constitutional rights of the peasants with his rogue independent criminal agency.
Barr is starting to speak out in frustration, but I think the Administration's ability to do anything about it in the absence of a supportive Congress is minimal.
Ha! You crack me up. Indictments!?
I usually throw money to bad strippers cause I feel sorry for them.
And I wait for rotation for the pretty no muffin ones
It’s time to start asking: Is John Durham more a part of the problem vs the solution? All this legalistic ‘footdragging’ would have worn out 10 pairs of new boots by now.
Prove me wrong, Mr. Durham, I wish that you would.
Wow hes quick
>>>Come on Barr. Time is running out. Trumps reelection is no longer guaranteed. Pull the trigger already. Sheesh.<<<
Think about it. The only possible way that any indictment would stick is contingent upon Trump being reelected. If somehow he were to lose, all the indictments would almost immediately be dismissed. A democratic administration would stop any action by the justice department.
And, if Trump loses, it will be Trump’s army that will be hunted down like dogs and prosecuted.
We have 40 years of history to prove this.
Why isnt this being publicly disclosed?
BUUUUUUUUT We decline fo prosecute.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.