Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers measure one-photon transitions in an unbound electron
Phys.org ^ | 03/23/2020 | ETH Zuricjh

Posted on 03/23/2020 8:03:22 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The dynamics of electrons change ever so slightly on each interaction with a photon. Physicists at ETH Zurich have now measured such interplay in its arguably purest form—by recording the attosecond-scale time delays associated with one-photon transitions in an unbound electron.

The photoelectric effect, whereby photons impinging on matter cause the emission of electrons, is one of the quintessential effects of quantum mechanics. Einstein famously explained the key mechanism underlying the phenomenon in 1905, earning him the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics. He built on a concept introduced five years earlier by Max Planck: Electromagnetic energy is absorbed and emitted only in discrete packets—that is, in quanta. The quantum concept revolutionized physics. The photoelectric effect, for its part, has been explored in ever greater detail, and is today exploited in applications ranging from solar cells to night-vision goggles.

...

The photoelectric effect, whereby photons impinging on matter cause the emission of electrons, is one of the quintessential effects of quantum mechanics. Einstein famously explained the key mechanism underlying the phenomenon in 1905, earning him the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics. He built on a concept introduced five years earlier by Max Planck: Electromagnetic energy is absorbed and emitted only in discrete packets—that is, in quanta. The quantum concept revolutionized physics. The photoelectric effect, for its part, has been explored in ever greater detail, and is today exploited in applications ranging from solar cells to night-vision goggles.

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: alberteinstein; attosecond; maxplanck; photoelectriceffect; photon; photons; physics; quantummechanics; science; stringtheory

1 posted on 03/23/2020 8:03:22 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

2 posted on 03/23/2020 8:04:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

An attosecond is a LOT shorter than an “in a second”.

Amazing stuff!


3 posted on 03/23/2020 8:12:27 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Great post! I have been debating what to teach my 10 year old since school is out for the rest of the year! Particle physics is interesting!


4 posted on 03/23/2020 8:17:29 PM PDT by gr8eman (Stupid should hurt! Treason should hurt more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

5 posted on 03/23/2020 8:20:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Would Heisenberg be OK with this?


6 posted on 03/23/2020 8:26:29 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The dynamics of electrons change ever so slightly on each interaction with a photon. Physicists at ETH Zurich have now measured such interplay in its arguably purest form—by recording the attosecond-scale time delays associated with one-photon transitions in an unbound electron.

"An attosecond is 1×10 −18 of a second (one quintillionth of a second). For context, an attosecond is to a second what a second is to about 31.71 billion years."

Can any human being really conceive of this time-span?

7 posted on 03/23/2020 8:26:55 PM PDT by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The researchers measured a delay of up to 12 attoseconds between outgoing s- and d-electrons in helium.

That's some superb measuring.

An attosecond is to a second what a second is to 31.71 billion years.

8 posted on 03/23/2020 8:32:46 PM PDT by TChad (The MSM, having nuked its own credibility, is now bombing the rubble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

9 posted on 03/23/2020 8:33:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch
Would Heisenberg be OK with this?

I'm not certain, on principle.

10 posted on 03/23/2020 8:42:25 PM PDT by null and void (By the pricking of my lungs, Something wicked this way comes ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman; BenLurkin; Daffynition
Particle physics is interesting!<<<

This work illustrates that 115 years after Einstein's seminal work, the photoelectric effect does not cease to inspire.

Quantum entanglement is known to be the exchange of quantum information between two particles at a distance...

11 posted on 03/23/2020 8:46:42 PM PDT by Ezekiel (The pun is mightier than the s-word. Goy to the World!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Well done!


12 posted on 03/23/2020 8:53:20 PM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TChad

So that is sort of like sex. It is over too soon.
And then you are old. ...... Well, that is what a friend told me.


13 posted on 03/23/2020 9:04:54 PM PDT by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Honest Nigerian

Maybe we should stick to happy posts about Coronavirus.


14 posted on 03/23/2020 9:19:43 PM PDT by TChad (The MSM, having nuked its own credibility, is now bombing the rubble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

An Attosecond is nice, but not as nice as the first attaboy.


15 posted on 03/23/2020 9:22:25 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

Would Heisenberg be OK with this?

That’s uncertain...


16 posted on 03/23/2020 9:35:12 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
"An attosecond is a LOT shorter than an “in a second”."

Yep! In the old days when you attended a Catholic school run by the nuns, according to my wife when the nun told you to do something and if you responded with "in a second", the attosecond was the amount of time before that ruler cracked you on the shoulder...

Which means the attosecond was well documented back in the 1940's, at least...

17 posted on 03/23/2020 9:59:14 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

Maybe.


18 posted on 03/23/2020 10:01:21 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
Thanks BenLurkin.


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

19 posted on 03/24/2020 9:08:01 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson