Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH: Mitch McConnell Rebukes Chuck Schumer for Threatening Supreme Court Justices
Life News ^ | March 5, 2020 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 03/05/2020 10:27:48 AM PST by Morgana

Senate Republicans are furious at pro-abortion Senator Chuck Schumer regarding his threats against Justice Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh over their votes on a pro-life Supreme Court case. Senator Josh Hawley has said he will bring up a motion to censure Schumer; but, meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell too to the Senate floor to rebuke him.

“There is nothing to call this except a threat,” he said.

“At the very best, his comments were astonishingly reckless and irresponsible,” McConnell said. “The minority leader of the United States Senate threatened two associate justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Period.”

McConnell asked Schumer to “withdraw his comments and apologize.”

“Contrary to what the Democratic leader has tried to claim, he very clearly was not addressing Republican lawmakers or anybody else,” McConnell said. “He literally directed the statement to the justices, by name. And he said, quote, ‘if you go forward with these awful decisions,’ which could only apply to the court itself. The minority leader of the United States Senate threatened two associate justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Period.”

“No matter the intention, words carrying the apparent threat of violence can have horrific unintended violence,” McConnell later added.

After McConnell’s statement, Schumer spoke on the Senate floor and refused to apologize.

“Now I should not have used the words I used,” Schumer said. “They didn’t come out the way I intended to … I’m from Brooklyn. We speak in strong language. But in no way was I making a threat. I never, never would do such a thing.”

The Senate was expected to vote today on a motion to censure Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for what pro-life Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri says are “disgusting, shameful, and frankly, WEAK” threats agaisnt the Supreme Court justices.

“I would call on Schumer to apologize, but we all know he has no shame,” Hawley tweeted late Wednesday. “So tomorrow I will introduce a motion to censure Schumer for his pathetic attempt at intimidation.”

Schumer threatened Trump-nominated Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh Wednesday, telling them they will “pay the price” if they uphold a pro-life law from Louisiana that saves babies from abortion and protects women’s health.

“I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price, Schumer yelled into the mic before a crowd of abortion supporters.

“You won’t know what hit you if you go through with these awful decisions,” he added.

After a deluge of criticism and Chief Justice John Roberts rebuking his “dangerous” comments, Schumer refused to apologize.

“For Justice Roberts to follow the right wing’s deliberate misinterpretation of what Senator Schumer said, while remaining silent when President Trump attacked Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg last week, shows Justice Roberts does not just call balls and strikes,” a spokesperson for Schumer responded.

“Women’s health care rights are at stake and Americans from every corner of the country are in anguish about what the court might do to them,” Goodman said in a statement to Fox News. “Sen. Schumer’s comments were a reference to the political price Senate Republicans will pay for putting these justices on the court, and a warning that the justices will unleash a major grassroots movement on the issue of reproductive rights against the decision.”

But the comment specifically referred to the justices, not Senate Republicans.

Responding to the tirade, pro-life Sen. Ben Sasse tore into Schumer.

“The Democratic Party is so radicalized on abortion politics that today Chuck Schumer threatened Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh if they didn’t strike down a simple, common-sense, pro-woman law that simply says that abortion doctors need to have admission privileges at a local hospital,” the Nebraska Republican said Wednesday in a statement. “Think about this, if a Republican threatened Justice Sotomayor or Justice Ginsburg, it would be the biggest story not just in Washington but all across America.”

“But, Chuck Schumer’s bully tactics aren’t getting much air time right now because there’s so many people in bed with his defense of abortion and his attack on an independent judiciary. These bullying tactics need to stop,” Sasse added.

Even the pro-abortion American Bar Association said they were “deeply troubled” by Schumer’s remarks.

“Whatever one thinks about the merits of an issue before a court, there is no place for threats — whether real or allegorical,” the ABA said in a statement. “Personal attacks on judges by any elected officials, including the President, are simply inappropriate. Such comments challenge the reputation of the third, co-equal branch of our government; the independence of the judiciary; and the personal safety of judicial officers. They are never acceptable.”

The Supreme Court yesterday morning held oral arguments on a key pro-life law that saves babies from abortion and protects women from dangerous abortions that could jeopardize their lives and health.

The 2014 Louisiana law at the center of the case requires abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges to treat patients with emergency complications. If allowed to take effect, it could close shoddy abortion facilities that are not prepared to help patients suffering from emergency complications.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: abortion; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2020 10:27:48 AM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It’s a federal crime. Perp Walk time.


2 posted on 03/05/2020 10:32:23 AM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

*YAWN*

What’s next? A sternly worded letter?

This is just another sterling example of the FACT that we have a TWO TIER “justice” system. Threatening Supreme Court Justices is now an acceptable way of doing things if you are a RAT Senator, I guess. Where will the next example come from?


3 posted on 03/05/2020 10:33:49 AM PST by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Stand up, Chuck! They’re your words, and you own them!


4 posted on 03/05/2020 10:34:03 AM PST by JPG (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

He’s from Brooklyn so he has no common sense or dignity? Is that what he means?

You’re a vile, evil little man Chuck and it’s time for Americans to punch your ticket.


5 posted on 03/05/2020 10:34:48 AM PST by Bullish (Covfefe Happens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle
Haha!!

Nothing gonna happen to Schumky...well nothing like him getting tossed out of Congress.

He might, might...give some weak ass apology...

And those on the right will give a reacharound..and all is forgiven.

6 posted on 03/05/2020 10:37:37 AM PST by Osage Orange (Whiskey Tango Foxtrot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The Senate should censure him and strip him of all committee memberships.


7 posted on 03/05/2020 10:38:46 AM PST by Sparticus (Primary the Tuesday group!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

In light of the suspicious death of Justice Scalia, Schumer’s threats take a dark turn, and Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh would rightfully be concerned.


8 posted on 03/05/2020 10:40:07 AM PST by reagandemocrat (Make California Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Contact Senator Chuck Schumer
Phone Number (202) 224-6542

TALKING POINTS: Stop saying you speak for women.

You do not speak for me and the many women I know who abhor the euphemism for killing babies, the so-called “right to choose.”

We pray for the safety of the Justices.

The right of an innocent defenseless child to be safe in its mother’s womb is the issue here.


9 posted on 03/05/2020 10:41:40 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use<.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

oooooh. He was ‘rebuked’.

So tough. So brave. So useless. Go turtle.


10 posted on 03/05/2020 10:48:02 AM PST by TheTimeOfMan (The Eloi unexpectedly protected the Morlocks from rogue Eloi as they themselves prepared to be eaten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Abortion: Shortening the journey from womb to tomb.


11 posted on 03/05/2020 10:51:05 AM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Will chucky be getting a predawn rain from the FyouBI or instead a “no intent” investigation, or nothing at all?.


12 posted on 03/05/2020 10:54:12 AM PST by inchworm (al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Why isn’t it illegal? Would be for you or me. Oh, right, we have Swamp Rat Barr running our DoJ.


13 posted on 03/05/2020 10:54:35 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

Schumer was NOT on the floor of congress.

Those words are beyond troubling. Where are the prosecutors?


14 posted on 03/05/2020 10:58:51 AM PST by ptsal ( Bust the NVIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Horrid.


15 posted on 03/05/2020 10:59:21 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use<.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Chuckie really stepped in it this time. AND he was VERY clear...Would like to see his seat flipped. Damn would that make us upstate folks happy.


16 posted on 03/05/2020 11:03:25 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparticus

It wouldn’t pass since it would require a 2/3 supermajority, but McConnell could also start a motion to expel Schumer. Impeachment does not apply to members of either house of Congress. Either house can expel a member by a 2/3 vote of that house without any other action needed.


17 posted on 03/05/2020 11:04:06 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle
It’s a federal crime.

Perhaps for you, me and any who read these pages. What is certain, however, is that our nation is lurching to the left.

What seems more likely to me than Schumer facing criminal charges is that the next time the dems have a majority in the house and 2/3d's+ of the senate, they will use their right to impeach USSC justices. Add the presidency and they will absolutely stack the court 9-0.

18 posted on 03/05/2020 11:06:08 AM PST by frog in a pot (Trump is in a street fight for the soul of our nation; he deserves our prayers and a share of luck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stremba
"Either house can expel a member by a 2/3 vote of that house without any other action needed."


19 posted on 03/05/2020 11:07:56 AM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Does a turtle puke...or just rebuke?


20 posted on 03/05/2020 11:09:21 AM PST by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson