Posted on 01/29/2020 4:05:36 PM PST by KC_Lion
Dispensing more of her supposed invaluable expertise, MSNBC’s Deadline: White House host and Republican-turned-lefty Nicolle Wallace boasted Tuesday about the barrage of anti-Trump breaking news developments (like those about John Bolton) being akin to “volcanic eruptions” and voting against witnesses would be “political suicide.”
Wallace took a stab at the first point during a break in the Senate impeachment trial prior to the final session, referring how there was a “morning news gush — and that's what these are” and “when you wake up to, like, volcano — volcanic eruptions.”
“Today's eruption brought a second excerpt from the Bolton book, about Donald Trump seeking to do favors for autocratic leaders and the John Kelly and all of it ties together and all of it sort undergirds this public pressure. 70 percent of voters want to see and hear from witnesses,” she added.
MSNBC legal analyst and former Obama official Chuck Rosenberg then compared removing a President to another specific power given to Congress in the Constitution: declare war:
(Video at source)
The Constitution reserves to Congress two of the most important decisions in the life of this country: whether to declare war and whether to remove a president from office and those two things are reserved to Congress by the text of the Constitution. A fascinating document. For either of those two things to happen, Do you want more information or less information? Do you declare war with no intelligence or with the best intelligence you can muster?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Maybe to a leftist Marxist commie. To normal thinking people it only makes good sense.
Maybe it’s time to tattoo LL on every Leftist Loser’s forehead. Use ink that only lasts 10 years then disappears. :D
So why wasn’t it political suicide for the House democrats who refused to subpoena Bolton or allow testimony by the so called whistleblower (aka “He Who Must Not be Named”)?
The senate is not the place for witnesses. They are to rule on the articles presented to them. If the house wants a do-over let them come up with new articles. The ones the presented to the senate don’t fly and should be dismissed.
Is that Brian Williams? So, he was there, in the Oval Office, during Trump’s phone call??
Well, with her record of advising winning campaigns, you really have to stand up and take notice. /s
Nicolle: you were not elected.
You are paid by a man to do something.
You are paid to say what some man wants said.
A leftist looking out for the best interest of the republicans. That’s so considerate of her.
When will it dawn on these morons that their gaslighting no longer works. Nobody believes or cares what they have to say.
All these people being caught up in this childish melodrama is pathetic while real domestic and national news goes unreported.
By the way the dems talk; everyone within a 500 mile radius of DC was listening. Second, third, or 433rd hand of course.
Hey! Trademark infringement.
Fake opinion being shown as news. At best ... totally fake
Even if everything Bolton is rumored to have said is 100% true IT IS STILL NOT AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
Ankle bracelet guy was supposed to do-in POTUS and this week its Wilfred Brummley Bolton.
Whatever.
LOL! Nicely played!
As opposed to wallace's unhinged, tempestuous rantings?
No one gives a flying rip about your news cycles except you, Chris, you maximum strength douche supertanker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.