Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan Markle invites Hillary Clinton over to the cottage to discuss babies
American Thinker ^ | 11/16/2019 | Monica Showalter

Posted on 11/17/2019 8:19:08 AM PST by simpson96

Meghan Markle is using those royal connections she married into, now to the hilt, for politics.

Far from being the aloof royal family member she said she'd be when she married Prince Harry last year, she's diving in.

According to the Daily Mail:

On Tuesday Meghan secretly invited former First Lady Hillary Clinton to visit her at Frogmore Cottage, her Windsor home, the Mail can reveal.

According to sources, the two women hugged during what was described as something of a 'fan girl' meeting.

Prince Harry and six-month-old Archie were there and Mrs Clinton, 72, even got to have a cuddle of the royal baby and told Meghan about Chelsea's new baby son, Jasper, her third grand-child.

'Both women have a lot of admiration for each other and it was a very sweet, warm meeting,' the source said,' they are mutual fan girls!"

This, Hillary being a Clinton, means that the claimed conversation wasn't about grandchildren. It was probably about politics, same as Bill Clinton's surprise and spontaneous meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on that famous tarmac in 2016.

Markle has already made it well enough known that she hates President Trump by her pre-royalty statements, and she has made it since clearer by refusing to meet with Trump on his state visit, which was otherwise quite cordial with the royal family. (Trump wasn't, after all, handing the queen iPods of his own speeches, which was probably all it took for things to be polite and courteous.) Class? Not from Markle. She demonstrated for us what lack of class is, from that duchess perch of hers, no less.

She's also dragging the British royal family down. They've got a family mission, for better or worse, of being the

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: clinton; golddigger; grifters; hillary; markle; meghan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
(con't.)

...upholder of British tradition. British tradition is that the royal family does not engage in cheap politics, no matter what the side, good, bad, or ugly. They'd be the height of courtesy to a rabid leftist like Jeremy Corbyn if he ever got elected prime minister. The royals are above that, and up until now, as the royals say, "rule holds."

Now we have Markle's latest act, which breaks that tradition, putting the royal family down in the gutter of foreign politics alongside herself. It's a sign that she not only doesn't respect British tradition, but doesn't respect the family that took her in, either.

And cripes, they've gone out of their way for her. In the past, a royal could marry only another royal, so she's a significant exception on that alone. It actually wasn't about race, either, or her being of partial African heritage. Race was not that big a deal for royals so long as a person seems royal — the Swedish royal family is intermarried with Brazilians, for instance, and aristocratic Russian poet Alexander Pushkin had African ancestry on one side. Nope, the royal family bent over to accommodate her because it was mostly about her being by trade an actress, a profession that historically has been considered too trashy for anything but a royal concubine spot. They broke their own rules and traditions to take her in as one of them, and now she's showing them how bad an idea that was, dragging them into U.S. politics, where they probably don't want to be.

It's selfish, too, in that Meghan's act uses the royal family's name to draw in Clinton to whatever political project she might have. Would Hillary Clinton have given Markle the time of day for that grandchild act if Markle had never married Prince Harry and instead remained a second-tier television actress?

It also places the royals in a pretty dangerous spot. Once they are seen as political players, it's only a matter of time before the other part of Britain decides it's time for them to go, and sure enough, that will be the end of it. It raises questions, then, about how long she's really going to last.

It's being packaged for us now as a cute little discussion about babies and grandchildren, but it's doubtful anyone — here, there, or way over here — is really fooled by it. She's just dragging the family that took her in into the mud of politics, and it's not a pretty picture. As Markle's own sister has said, she's a user. Maybe there's something to that claim after all.

1 posted on 11/17/2019 8:19:08 AM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Spiders, Cankles and Hos Oh My!


2 posted on 11/17/2019 8:20:40 AM PST by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Markle likes to raise her public profile. She and Hillary are using each other as an excuse for a bit of publicity. They probably sat around telling Queen Elizabeth jokes.


3 posted on 11/17/2019 8:21:48 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

HArry is done for. Meghan, who formerly worshiped the Washington monument now has converted to the tongue and groove lumber crowd.Poor Harry, Meghan now has no use for nails.


4 posted on 11/17/2019 8:22:37 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

LOL!! How Loretta Lynch/Slick Willie of them.


5 posted on 11/17/2019 8:23:32 AM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Discuss babies? Is Meghan looking for a recommendation for a position with planned parenthood?


6 posted on 11/17/2019 8:23:32 AM PST by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

Might as well discuss yoga while they’re at it.


7 posted on 11/17/2019 8:24:40 AM PST by C210N (If you dislike productive billionaires, be 1,000 times more suspect of one confiscatory trillionaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

...the meeting turned ugly though when Clinton tried to drink Archie’s blood.


8 posted on 11/17/2019 8:25:04 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

It was just a friendly recipe exchange. Clinton shared a splendid deep fried recipe while the “princess” shared her favorite... a more simple tartare perpetration.

(Not miss-spelled)


9 posted on 11/17/2019 8:25:11 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Nicely done Harry.


10 posted on 11/17/2019 8:26:39 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Considering the Windsors have 2 American Deep Staters on their payroll, I seriously doubt the discussion centered around anyone’s progeny.


11 posted on 11/17/2019 8:27:54 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Just a friendly chat. Just girl talk. Neither one wants to gain anything from the other's spotlight. Pshaw!

12 posted on 11/17/2019 8:29:28 AM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

The hoity toitees don’t abort their offspring. They are your future oppressors.


13 posted on 11/17/2019 8:29:32 AM PST by dforest (Just shut up Obama. Maybe everyone should just shut up. Particularly Mutt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

The Doucheness of Sussex.


14 posted on 11/17/2019 8:34:58 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Ain’t that the truth. Well, at least they (socialists/dems) are staying true to the vision of their patron saint, Margaret Sanger.


15 posted on 11/17/2019 8:40:42 AM PST by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

Recipes, maybe?


16 posted on 11/17/2019 8:42:52 AM PST by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Inviting this witch over to see the bitch to discuss “babies” must be for recipes. Crock pot, slow roasted, pan fried etc. Evil, evil people.


17 posted on 11/17/2019 8:45:59 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Unless you count Princess Di.


18 posted on 11/17/2019 8:46:43 AM PST by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

More surprised that Chelsea named her son after Dana Perino’s dog than that Markle is ho-ing for Hillary.


19 posted on 11/17/2019 8:48:27 AM PST by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

“Mommy...why does Nanny always smell like Jaspers diaper?”


20 posted on 11/17/2019 8:54:08 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson