Posted on 11/01/2019 10:33:59 AM PDT by ransomnote
(TNS) Under the guise of “protecting LGBTQ” individuals, a group of California Democrats has introduced legislation that would protect adult sexual offenders who prey upon minors.
If you were wondering why we refer to Democrats as the Garbage Party, this is yet another of the many reasons.
As reported by the California Globe:
State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.”
However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor.
“Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion,” said Wiener (and of course, that would be his name).
“This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor,” SB 145 states.
Within 10 years of the age of the minor.
So…a 20-year-old man/woman can sexually abuse a 10-year-old child and get away with it because…’blatant discrimination against LGBT young people….’
These people are seriously disturbed.
Not only that, they are monumental hypocrites.
Because we’re betting that not a single one of these lunatics would be so forgiving of anyone — regardless of their sexual orientation — who targeted and then sexually abused their children.
But under the BS claim of “discrimination,” they think it should be okay for adults to abuse kids, sexually. Period. That’s all this legislation comes down to.
It’s not “discrimination” to arrest someone and charge them with sexually abusing a minor if in fact there is evidence of the crime. It’s not discriminatory to convict and sentence them. It’s not discriminatory to make them register as sex offenders, regardless of their sexual orientation.
Unless, of course, you’re a lunatic pervert yourself and a Democrat.
It’s becoming obvious that the Garbage Party can do no wrong in California, no matter how corrupt, stupid, deranged, and sick they are, because voters continue to return them to power.
Piles of human waste on the streets? Bundles of used drug needles? Medieval diseases on the rise? Homeless camps along the boulevard? Perverted adults sexually abusing kids?
“These people are seriously disturbed.”
No duh.
Forget the border.
Start building a wall around certain parts of CA.
I know there are conservative areas.
But wow a lot of the state has LOST ITS MIND.
I wonder if Silicon Valley’s brain trusts brought about the insanity more quickly.
Gotta figure a lot of whack jobs went to work for them.
“Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse)
So…a 20-year-old man/woman can sexually abuse a 10-year-old child and get away with it because…’blatant discrimination against LGBT young people….’
Based on the material, the example of a 10 year old being sexually abused by a 20 year old does not apply. The minor needs to be 15 years or older for this more lenient treatment to be applied.
Look at the picture of the authors of this bill, looks like they are writing a bill to protect themselves.
Is this what Gov. Gavin Newsom meant back in 2008, when he came out in support for gay marriage even though it kept being voted down by the people? “It’s coming, whether you like it or not!”. Back then, several Dems pretended to be embarrassed by the then Atty. General’s arrogance.
When gay marriage was passed, I told my sister that the real goal was pedophilia. She thought I was on crack (well more than usual)
Two centuries ago, a somewhat obscure Scotsman named Tytler made this profound observation: "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury.He was wrong.
He missed another possibility: that a very powerful minority would discover that it can change the demographics of the democracy, and thereby temporarily win themselves a continuation of their time in power.
Tytler tried — but failed — to see how short-sighted and foolish people could be.
The same insanity that led to the $2.4 billion Harvey Milk Terminal at San Francisco Airport.
The NAMBLA candidates?
Like pencil-neck Schitt.
It’s always been the liberal dream to mainstream NAMBLA.
We better get serious about protecting our young kids. With deadly force if necessary.
Ah yes, the demoKKKrats always looking out for the interests of the childen. /sarc
And Swalwell...
So just as with “self-identifying” as so-called “transgender” offers great benefits, now self-identifying as lgbetc. will offer a form of get-out-of-jail free card by exempting sex offenders from having to live as sex offenders. Only in the minds of liberals. It makes me want to pry extensively into the lives of weiner and the other maniac, maybe find out what private “clubs” they belong to. Could this be a sop to NAMBLA?
They are just following the logical progression of the slippery slope that everyone was warned about. The reasonings that you use in defense of gay marriage are the same arguments for sex with everything else, including animals, children, and objects.
They seek to normalize their behavior to achieve easier access to MOLEST YOUR CHILDREN!
>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/<
On page 37, the other relevant result relates to men.
The 13th research question addressed, of homosexual men who have been molested, what percentage were molested before self-identification as homosexual men, and what percentage were molested after self-identification as homosexual? Of homosexual men who were molested, 68% were molested before self-identification as homosexual, and 32% were molested after self-identification as homosexual.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Q6pDGNQw3I<
The Left's Push For Pedophile Acceptance
If you want my Word Doc. with links to 20 other studies supporting this position, Private Message me with your e-mail.
“So…a 20-year-old man/woman can sexually abuse a 10-year-old child and get away with it”
Author didn’t even read their own article? The law clearly says it only applies to minors over the age of 15.
Recall Gavin Newsom
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.