|
Posted on 10/07/2019 6:13:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Fact: Anthony Weiner convicted in a plea deal of underage porn stuff.
Media: The Congressman made a mistake texting this girl.
Fact: Weiner's digital media seized by Federal and NY State authorities reveals archives of Hillary's emails.
Media: Just a glitch with Huma's Apple synch program, probably nothing.
Fact: Hillary burned over 33,000 emails on her private server when subpoenaed, destroyed numerous electronic devices by hammering them. With a hammer.
Media: Huh? Very complicated but she's fine. Probably an accident.
Fact: Hillary's private server, shared with Huma (and Anthony) contained Special Access Program (SAP) information. Information classified above top secret.
Media: Only a small fraction of the emails on her server contained classified information. Probably less than 1% (of tens of thousands).
Fact: All of Hillary's emails were intercepted or forwarded to unknown destinations around the world while she was Secretary of State, and possibly while she was a Senator.
Media: Everybody does it. (qv Colin Powell)
Fact: Attempts were made by Hillary and others to destroy, obliterate, or conceal, information on her private servers.
Media: it was just a server in a closet in Colorado, no big deal.
Fact: Hillary's private server(s) were directly connected to the Clinton Foundation computer network.
Media: There is no proof of quid-pro-quo between Hillary's statemanship and her husband's foundation.
Alleged: The FBI was or is in possession of 340,000 emails between Hillary and Huma stored on Wiener's laptop and devices. The Comey FBI covered up this fact. Did the Beast have 340k emails about yoga and wedding plans? Did the FBI review this many in just a few days and determine that "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue charges?
The conclusion is up to you.
Ransomnote, if this is not allowed, feel free to delete it.
I caught this gal, this morning on Live Leak. Millie Weaver. She does vids as Millenial Millie. (she’s kind of well endowed haha, so a little warning)
I thought this vid was interesting and a good explanation of why Biden delayed his getting into the run (had to with the elections in Ukraine). How the Ukraine elections were messed with by Soros and his ilk. She gives an excellent background explanation on this whole impeachment disaster and has some interesting takes on it. And she has information that aunti fa plans on staging mass protests on Oct 19. she is connected to Infowars and I’m not sure can we put that here? I know many of us go “hmmm” when it comes to Alex Jones. The vid is 15 min long.
Little Jeremiah, I know your computer isn’t cooperating so I tried to summarize, but I can listen to it again, if you want a better summarization.
https://www.millennialmillie.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND40ur07Eyo
I hadn’t heard of her until this morning.
Petey
good tweets
https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1181667714575867904
https://twitter.com/3Days3Nights/status/1151008323271122944
https://twitter.com/3Days3Nights/status/1157490830183194624
https://twitter.com/TheSharpEdge1/status/1181329889338613760
Check out the video at link.
And I am digging stuff how CIA=Corn. Still finding stuff.
https://amgreatness.com/2019/10/07/time-to-reassess-crowdstrikes-credibility/
Time To Reassess CrowdStrike’s Credibility
Trump foes dismiss any scrutiny of CrowdStrike as part of a “conspiracy theory.” But the tangled web between CrowdStrike, Democratic operatives, the Trump-hating media and the Obama Justice Department isn’t a theory, it is fact.
Long term..... Supreme Court. Short term.... he is an exceptional prosecutor.
(Permission to revise and extend previous remarks…)
I now strongly suspect the whistleblower was bait in a disinfo op run by Gina to trigger stupid people into running off the cliff.
The WB assembles a bunch of hearsays and interpretations of events indicating dirty dealings by 45, that the President was strong arming Ukraine into investigating the Bidens for strong arming Ukraine into stopping investigations of lucrative corruption. Of course, he or she then dangle it in front of Schiff and friends, who are very hungry. Hook, line and sinker. A major counter-offensive is now possible!
The “complaint” is quickly formalized and submitted to ICIG Atkinson, Nancy modifies House rules for Impeachment, the “Whistleblower form” is modified adding a source checkbox for hearsay along with every day actual witnessing of actions. These were all on August 12th, but not exactly occurring in that order.
A few words about the declassified Complaint. Well crafted, well documented with footnotes, it makes a case for trumping 45. Oddly, it also seems to make a case for investigating pre-45 corruption and political interference by detailing the conspiracy theories of some crazy Ukrainians. It also contains various negative spins of Administration actions by faceless officials with the vapors. As an indictment, sure, it’s more plausible than the Steele Dossier but that bar is lower than…
Anyway, Atkinson receives the complaint and investigates finding several named persons corroborating the complaint (“Yeah, I said that.”). On the 14th day deadline he forwards his “credible and urgent concern” conclusion to acting DNI Maguire. Maguire, former head of the NCC, issues no report to the congressional Intel committees on the deadline to do so. After a week, the ICIG sends a memo to Schiff officially announcing the already known.
Schiff writes Maguire demanding details of the complaint. After a few days pass, the ICIG General Counsel writes and explains it was judged not of urgent concern after a consult with the DOJ. Predictably, the complaint is subpoenaed with strong words to Maguire: “you have neither the legal authority nor the discretion to overrule a determination by the IC IG.”
The WP gets the story and it’s “All aboard the ‘Peach Train!” Outlandish theories arise and demands are made. At every presser the President trolls with the truth which somehow obviously proves his guilt.
++++++
Subsequent events have kept us near the edge of our seats at this movie. Info and disinfo fill the air, doubt flickers about major players, the counter-offensive seems awesome, our film narrator has gone dark, popcorn overdoses are flooding emergency rooms…
Just as the SC was a useful function of the Plan, this movie seems destined to have its climax in the Senate with a world-wide audience. The Ds are being herded in that direction by Q+’s taunting tweets with Barr and Huber sheepdogging from afar.
Like the final scenes in Atlas, as the Narrative (carefully crafted for many decades) dissolves, the perps and proxies will grow more vicious. But in Ayn’s world, the Marines weren’t on standby.
From the last drops…
Be vigilant. See something. Say something.
Know your surroundings at all times.
Public understanding of events just around the corner.
You have more than you know.
Excellent account per Zeifman. His name doesn’t ring a bell but his account of the story on HIllary does. I don’t know how long I’ve known that story, but 2016 seems like yesterday, when this CATO article was written.
Also, didn’t realize Zeifman was counsel for the HOR, and not in at all charge of her crew of stray cat Yalees on the job.
Good to know exactly, going forward. It could be important, the report says.
Thanks very much.
lj flips, I flop ... and ransomnote continues to ponder. No matter what the outcome, it’s a glorious plan! ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While I continue to believe RR is a black hat, I don’t have evidence for my current theory as to the “why” he was hired when he was. I’m okay with the theory that he was left there due to Deep State accusations that any attempt to remove him would be POTUS violating the rule of law (doesn’t mean I am right, but my mind stops toying with it for awhile).
I favor my theory that they chose RR because he was suitably tarnished to satisfy the baying hounds of the deep state (they’d let investigation continue without de-legitimatizing the Trump administration as would be the case if an obvious white hat was chosen). I suspect, if JHTH is correct, RR was loyal to himself first, and all about being AG. This would make him preferable to the white hats when their other options would be cabal loyalists, but RR’d still be a huge risk (anyone can make a man of no loyalty “happy” for a time).
So I suspect POTUS and Q et. al. chose him believing if they could give him enough of what he wanted (defacto AG with opportunities for AG position going forward) they could leave him in place as DAG and that would give the optics needed and the investigation would be sufficiently “normal”. RR could be expected to reason that if he played his cards honestly for all to see on the public stage, he could advance to AG. That little theory guess-timation thingamabob is the first time I’ve had a chance at explaining “why choose Sessions knowing he would recuse?” (because I do think they knew). So BOOM! RR is functioning as AG in all but formal title. That should keep him happy. Sessions would have to try to keep him away from undue deep state influence. But would it be enough for RR to stay fair and objective?
I think Mueller, RR were spoken to ahead of time to reduce the risk, and it was a “deal” of some other kind but not with all cards on the table (meeting between Mueller and POTUS). I guess they would try to take an interest in seeing what Mueller wanted and moving him closer to it. So dangle something Mueller wanted to keep him away from RR.
Despite those efforts, or the deal, Mueller got to RR behind Session’s back and convinced him that POTUS was going to be impeached and RR would be wise, heroic even, to get onboard and help lest he be left holding the bag after Trump’s “impeachment.” I think that’s why RR said that history calls etc. and that he stood with Mueller (which speaks of ego, IMHO).
RR’s choice of an SC and Mueller had to be a blindside to beat all blindsides, however I think the white hats believed RR and what he could do were risks they had to take to avoid “Plan Z”. The DS would have just pulled down the government with screams of corruption and dictatorship if a white hat was chosen instead of RR because they had too much to lose. Back then, no Q to help the public understand.
Ermmmmm....evidence for my theory is ....uh...not much! Well...uhm...NOTHING! I only like it because it could address some of these missing pieces are so annoying.
If parts of my theory are true (or at least RR’s “surprise” decision to have an SC and have it be Mueller regardless of motive) the white hats have been delayed by a year or two. I’ve always had the feeling that we are winning but it’s behind the schedule POTUS/Q/White hats set. I think at some point Q tried to make up for lost time. But hey - theories are free and plentiful!
That’s where security clearance would come in nicely. Very nicely.
*writes it on Q Christmas list* :D
I’d like to build my understanding about how such things are reasoned, as it doesn’t come naturally to me. Too many possible explanations etc. I went looking and found a framework, but I wonder if there is a simple(r) methodology?
~~~~~~~~~~~
“Raymond S. Nickerson (1987), an authority on critical thinking, characterizes a good critical thinker in
terms of knowledge, abilities, attitudes, and habitual ways of behaving. Here are some of the
characteristics of such a thinker:
z uses evidence skillfully and impartially
z organizes thoughts and articulates them concisely and coherently
z distinguishers between logically valid and invalid inferences
z understands the difference between reasoning and rationalizing
z attempts to anticipate the probable consequences of alternative actions
z understands the idea of degrees of belief
z sees similarities and analogies that are not superficially apparent
z can learn independently and has an abiding interest in doing so
z applies problem-solving techniques in domains other than those in which learned
z can structure informally represented problems in such a way that formal techniques, such as
mathematics, can be used to solve them
z can strip a verbal argument of irrelevancies and phrase it in its essential terms
z habitually questions one’s own views and attempts to understand both the assumptions that are
critical to those views and the implications of the views
z is sensitive to the difference between the validity of a belief and the intensity with which it is held
z is aware of the fact that one’s understanding is always limited, often much more so than would be
An Introduction to Critical Thinking Page 4 of 13
http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html 8/2/2008
apparent to one with a noninquiring attitude
z recognizes the fallibility of one’s own opinions, the probability of bias in those opinions, and the
danger of weighting evidence according to personal preferences
http://facultycenter.ischool.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Critical-Thinking.pdf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I wonder to what degree some of this can be learned? In my search I read repeatedly that it can’t be lectured or “read” into use - the thinking skills have to be developed through actual use. I think we are doing that, and have been doing that all along, but I’d like a boost from outside info. In particular, I’d like some structure to my thinking so I’d trip over it (like an ottoman) if I was unwittingly factoring in bias etc.
I took one out of the list above: “z suspends judgment in the absence of sufficient evidence to support a decision”. In our case, we often have to theorize until more is known (classified intel - we may never know!). I think natural personality differences and skill sets make some more comfortable working with partial information (i.e., don’t we WANT bankers to know their facts first? don’t we want theorists to “do something” while waiting for more info?).
That list isn’t exactly what i had in mind, but I’d go for something like “The 5 points to consider when analyzing...”
Jerome Zeifman was lead counsel for the House Judiciary Committee. but was not the lead counsel for the impeachment inquiry, to whom Hillary reported. So he could not fire her. But he was quoted as calling her a liar, years later, and that if he had the power, he would have fired her. As it was, when they no longer needed her and a few others, at the end of the impeachment inquiry, he did tell her he could not recommend her for any further positions.
https://newsbreakinglive.com/2019/10/08/breaking-bernie-sanders-daughter-in-law-dies/
DIL a neuropsychologist and head of behavioral science at Dartmouth?
I love Rumsfeld’s “we know what we know but we don’t know what we don’t know and we don’t know what we don’t know that we don’t know.” - if we knew those things ... then it would be obvious ... or maybe not lol WWG1WGA :)
i think that is one of two most likely scenarios..fed disinformation to see who would take the bait...have the whole scenario backed up, transcript, giuliani, biden info, ukraine already reinvestigating etc..how could wb get the name of someone and say he was in on the call and he wasn't? mistake or canary trap?
other possible scenario imo ds petrified with what is coming and got a couple of diehards to make up this story and ds threw a hail mary to try and shortcut barr etc...
ps lawyers don't have privileged communication when it involves crimes-crime-fraud exception.
Place mark.
Thanks, very much. Appreciate it.
Original Mouseketeer...Roy always creeped me out...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
