The Case for Streep on the US Supreme Court

https://steemit.com/politics/@gungasnake/how-to-replace-ruth-ginzburg ^

[ganeemead]

"When President Trump replaces Ruth Ginsberg, I mean, to actually replace her with something more or less equivalent (prize for ugliest of the ugly amongst demokkkrat women) he's gonna be back to the realm of fairytales ("Mirror mirror on the wall, who's the UGLIEST of them all??") and, of course, there's only one answer to that:"

[Bon mots]

[GOPJ]

Trump needs to replace her - when the time comes - with a conservative man...

[mrsmith]

Anti-Consdtitution “ the center of the Lefi...

comstititionm to fo, matbe mot.

[familyop]

"Trump needs to replace her - when the time comes - with a conservative man..."

Yes, a man with a real record of defending our Second Amendment rights. The Democrats are wanting to take those rights more than anything else now, and we can't afford it. They would violate all other rights then. Some of the feminists in conservative circles can't imagine the horrors that would follow, but former combat leadership instructors, historians and a few others know.

[mumblypeg]

The point of the OP was what exactly?

[BenLurkin]

Something about Meryl Streep. Or something.

[mumblypeg]

Meryl Streep, Justice Ginsburg, and a gorilla.
Oh, now I get it!
It was triangular!

[Nateman]

It’s going to get super ugly no matter what, so pick Ann Coulter first so they take whoevelr you pick second without much of a fight .

[Paladin2]

Why not appoint AC twice so she gets two votes?

[TokarevM57]

...in all truth, I just do not see that happening... there will be way, WAY too much pressure on Trump to nominate a woman for that spot.... probably a very conservative one, for sure, but a woman...imagine the uproar if he nominates another man (gasp...!) for that spot... I just think the pressure on him will be very great.....jus’ sayin’ ....

[Cboldt]

The first nominee is going to be thrown under the bus anyway. Might as well maximize the anxiety.

[meatloaf]

Amy Barrett https://www.scotusblog.com/2018/07/potential-nominee-profile-amy-coney-barrett/

[Cboldt]

Just don’t nominate Amy Barrett first. I’d dead serious, the first nominee WILL go under the bus. Maybe the second one too.

[Larry Lucido]

Saturn?

[Tanniker Smith]

Came to read the comments because the headline and the opening sentence seemed so ... odd (I’ll be charitable).

[Liz]

"Wanna say hello to Aunt Ruthie?"

[meatloaf]

The Democrats will expose themselves further by attacking Barrett. She’s successful any way you look at her. More energy for Trump’s base.