Skip to comments.
Elon Musk endorses Andrew Yang for President
The Federalist ^
| Aug 2019
| Tristan Justice
Posted on 08/27/2019 2:01:26 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: Kid Shelleen
Stay tuned for the next debate to find out...
21
posted on
08/27/2019 2:16:55 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Well, that should do it. President Yang is inevitable.
22
posted on
08/27/2019 2:23:57 PM PDT
by
Veto!
(Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me))
To: CondoleezzaProtege
To: MacNaughton
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Elon Musk endorses Andrew Yang for President And thereby demonstrates that his critics are correct. He is an idiot.
No rational person would regard any of the collection of Democrat kooks as capable of winning an election anywhere outside of an asylum.
25
posted on
08/27/2019 2:36:49 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
To: CondoleezzaProtege
This is excellent. Instead of going with one of the candidates polling in the teens or 20s, Musk picks a third tier guy. More better factions.
26
posted on
08/27/2019 2:38:47 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
To: MacNaughton
Idiot thinks socialism will work if you just get the right people to run it.
Idiot is an idiot.
And this is one reason why South Africans might not be a good fit in the United States. Too socialistic.
27
posted on
08/27/2019 2:39:28 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
To: CondoleezzaProtege
I always knew musk was crazy.
28
posted on
08/27/2019 2:41:30 PM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
RCP has Yang at 2.2%, this could shoot him to 2.3!
29
posted on
08/27/2019 2:53:24 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
To: MacNaughton
30
posted on
08/27/2019 3:32:42 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Charity comes from wealth.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
31
posted on
08/27/2019 3:33:12 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Musk just admitted that he is a loser who supports losers. Yang for President? Wow. Poor Mr. Musk. Disabled by drugs.
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Time for Trump to stop all federal subsidies for Tesla. Tell Elon to get the money from Yang!
34
posted on
08/27/2019 8:13:00 PM PDT
by
Bommer
(2020 - Vote all incumbent congressmen and senators out! VOTE THE BUMS OUT!!!)
To: Magnum44
A thousand bucks with zero welfare is a big savings in the long run. Heck just what we spend on housing in section 8 would equal big savings.
35
posted on
08/27/2019 9:39:35 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
By the way, I am actually a socialist. Just not the kind that shifts resources from most productive to least productive, pretending to do good, while actually causing harm. True socialism seeks greatest good for all.:
Elon Musk Twitter account
36
posted on
08/27/2019 9:45:54 PM PDT
by
Fedora
To: Fedora
True socialism seeks greatest good for all. Oh nonsense.
At it's very best socialism seeks to help the majority.
Of course taken to the logical conclusion that means that you will throw 49% of the population in the pot to feed the 51%.
At it's worst it is a bunch of swaggering tin plated dictators with delusions of godhood.
37
posted on
08/27/2019 9:57:37 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Human beings don't behave rationally. We rationalize our behavior.)
To: napscoordinator
If your post was an endorsement of Yang, I’ll let someone else try to explain why replacing one system of thievery with another system of thievery is not a good solution.
38
posted on
08/27/2019 10:07:34 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: napscoordinator
A thousand bucks with zero welfare...It would never happen that way. The thousand bucks would start up immediately, and the welfare would continue with the promise of an eventual phase-out. But the phase-out would never happen.
It would be sort of like Reagan's 1986 amnesty which was sold on the promise of Congressional action to secure the border. We have all seen how well THAT turned out.
And by the way, Yang has stated that the money would only be available to citizens. By today's standards, that's racist, so the money handout would have to go to illegals as well.
39
posted on
08/27/2019 10:42:55 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(The Electoral College is the firewall protecting us from massive blue state vote fraud.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
An entity that exists because of California mandates and Federal grants is not a business...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
