Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2019 8:53:45 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: simpson96

Roma Torre has been around forever. I always liked NY1; hope she gets rehired.


2 posted on 06/22/2019 8:56:02 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Now, Ladies, everybody knows that TV is a visual medium.
It’s only natural to show someone at their most attractive, as a way to interest viewers. Men go through this too, though in more subtle ways. Why do you think people like Brett Baird keep having to lose weight every so often, or the older guy on Fox & Friends wears that Daniel Boone-ish toupee?


3 posted on 06/22/2019 9:01:36 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I’m not a lawyer, but I wonder if these networks can practically exempt themselves from most age and gender discrimination lawsuits by re-classifying their work force so they operate like a couple of the only industries where age, gender and even RACIAL discrimination is perfectly legal: the entertainment and advertising industries. Call them “actors/actresses” instead of “news anchors,” and the whole legal environment changes dramatically.


4 posted on 06/22/2019 9:02:06 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Same thing happened at WSMV in Nashville. Older respected and liked news presenters let go to hire younger people.


5 posted on 06/22/2019 9:02:30 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Where does it say in the Constitution anyone is entitled to the property another has labored for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Couldn’t get the woman to smile. I know that they are dealing with a serious subject, but that picture isn’t helping their case.


6 posted on 06/22/2019 9:03:48 AM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

They had no problem with the issue when they were young and cute. Sorry ladies, 25 is the limit in Hollywierd.


7 posted on 06/22/2019 9:06:20 AM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

-—...alleging a systematic effort by managers to force them off the air in favor of younger, less experienced hosts.-—

Correction - younger and prettier.

As is often admitted, the object of any tv show is to get as many eyeballs watching the paid advertisements as possible. That is the hard reality of that business.

And by the way, who needs experience? They all read off a teleprompter anyway.


8 posted on 06/22/2019 9:07:08 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I watch local news to.......wait for it.........wait for it.........GET THE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don’t give a crap what they look like as long as they can speak understandable English....


9 posted on 06/22/2019 9:10:17 AM PDT by JBW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

If they weren’t attractive young eye-candy when they were hired, they would not have been hired in the first place.

Now that they are older and no longer as attractive, they complain.

One solution, going forward, would be to have the contract explicitly state that they would be hired for no more than 5 years, and that there would be no renewal. And for the channel to stick to that.


10 posted on 06/22/2019 9:12:30 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

C’mon, gotta make room for those younger, more attractive, less well compensated news readerettes. It’s all about the ratings & ad revenue...and of course, the boobage.

;)


12 posted on 06/22/2019 9:14:59 AM PDT by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Those are some cranky-looking ladies.

Watching them would depress the living snot outta me.

And I’m a chick.


13 posted on 06/22/2019 9:15:21 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
to force them off the air in favor of younger, less experienced, cheaper hosts.

Added one of the more important reasons for the "change". Most of these local cable stations run on a shoestring. If these ladies were that good, most of them would have been snapped up by the bigger stations in the area or even a national cable outfit. If they aren't that good, they just become a bigger drain on salary expenses as they age.

15 posted on 06/22/2019 9:17:28 AM PDT by ssaftler (The opinions expressed here have not been peer reviewed, fact checked or focus group tested.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

The women have a point.

Hell, for the 2016 election, ABC dragged out the corpse of Charlie Gibson and NBC, after applying a little air freshener, put Tom Brokaw on the air.

To say Gibson was hard to look at is an understatement.

And, Brokaw did nothing but mumble. I swear, I thought his dentures were going to fall out at any moment.


16 posted on 06/22/2019 9:21:06 AM PDT by Conserv (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

“Less experienced”

How much experience does it take to read the news to a camera?


23 posted on 06/22/2019 10:07:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Sue them, but seriously, what did you expect? They hired you when you were young and sexy BECAUSE you were young and sexy. You’re surprised they don’t want you now?

This is what the media does. It’s all show. All a pretty face. It’s shallow entertainment. Substance is not wanted. Pretty, superficial fluff is what it’s all about.


24 posted on 06/22/2019 10:13:17 AM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

28 posted on 06/22/2019 10:20:06 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I remember when all news was read from a table. Shortly after the ladies came in, the tables went, and the legs were on display.


31 posted on 06/22/2019 10:45:04 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I’d have to see their replacements before I commit to

Not Guilty


36 posted on 06/22/2019 11:11:25 AM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I remember way back when flight attendants, stewardesses then, were young, fit, and attractive. There were weight restrictions. Then this same nonsense happened and all you get now are surley, portly, old hags that should retire.


37 posted on 06/22/2019 11:42:59 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
“Men age on TV with a sense of gravitas, and we as women have an expiration date.”

The men got their jobs because of voice, delivery style and yes looks.

The women got their jobs because of looks, looks and oh yes, looks.

FOX News has some eye candy bimbos with grating voices, big teats, beautiful faces, slim waists, long legs, no brains and are destined to have short TV jaunts.

Old hookers get less money than young hookers.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

I know that many women are going to go flamethrower crazy on this post, but in 98.7% of the time, am I wrong?

My % might be slightly off, but...

38 posted on 06/22/2019 12:09:48 PM PDT by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson