Skip to comments.
Cat sparks $7.5k rescue mission..on bridge six days..gets bored and wanders home [tr]
FoxNews.com ^
| May 31, 2019
| Nicole Darrah | Fox News
Posted on 06/03/2019 10:51:39 AM PDT by ETL
Full title:
Cat sparks $7,500 rescue mission after getting stuck on bridge six days; mission fails, pet gets bored and wanders home
Hatty, 5, became trapped on the Royal Albert Bridge, which connects Plymouth and Saltash, on Friday, and firefighters spent around five hours trying to get her down in an ordeal costing $7,500. The train system which operates the bridge even planned to close the tracks to rescue her, while the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) was also present.
But when firefighters had decided to give up for the day, vowing to return Thursday, the cat, who had been missing for two weeks before turning up on the bridge, returned home on Wednesday night, according to the Plymouth Herald.
Kirsty Howden, Hattys owner, said the cat walked into the garden of her home in Saltash.
She said the cat had just strolled past fire and media crews. ...
She is a bit skinny and smelly, very vocal and has now headed upstairs and put herself to bed.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: england; kittyping; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: cherry
Not mush to the cat’s owner. I and a lot of people I know love animals. I always forget that there are people like you out there. It says everything about a person
when they care about non human creatures. Nothing sexier than a man who is tough & manly, but a marshmallow for animals.
41
posted on
06/03/2019 11:36:40 AM PDT
by
leaning conservative
(snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: sparklite2
Probably in the sixties when we realized
we neednt be assholes about the lives
of non-humans.
It’s not about bein assholes. It’s about knowing the difference between a human being and an animal. I understand that PETA feels differently, but I don’t take them seriously anyway, except when the chicks get naked.
To: ETL
Hahahaha...so funny. Typical cat.
43
posted on
06/03/2019 11:51:39 AM PDT
by
Avalon Memories
(This Deplorable is not fooled by the Marxist-Stalinist totalitarians infesting the Dem Party.)
I wonder if Brunel would have something pithy to say about shutting down a rail line to rescue a moggy from his bridge?
To: cuban leaf
Did it ever occur to you that it’s possible to know the difference between humans and animals, and still have compassion for animals in distress?
45
posted on
06/03/2019 11:55:25 AM PDT
by
Avalon Memories
(This Deplorable is not fooled by the Marxist-Stalinist totalitarians infesting the Dem Party.)
To: cuban leaf
46
posted on
06/03/2019 11:56:28 AM PDT
by
Kommodor
(Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
To: cherry
spending tax monies from hardworking people so "save" a cat...
Sitting in the firehouse or rescuing a cat, there's no cost differential since they're salaried and not paid by the mission...LOL!
47
posted on
06/03/2019 12:01:17 PM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
To: sparklite2
48
posted on
06/03/2019 12:01:36 PM PDT
by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: cuban leaf
No, it actually is about being an asshole. Congratulations, you win!
49
posted on
06/03/2019 12:02:14 PM PDT
by
leaning conservative
(snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Avalon Memories
Did it ever occur to you that its possible to know the difference between humans and animals, and still have compassion for animals in distress?
Yes. But that’s not the issue. Using tax dollars to save cats is only acceptable in Pleasantville. IN the real world, that is not what firefighters and rescue are for. They are for saving human beings and their property. Part of that property would be their pets and livestock, but it is for the sake of the owner who could lose valuable livestock or a beloved pet. It’s not for the animal itself. That is what individuals and volunteers do. Not one amendment to the constitution or the constitution itself speaks to the welfare of animals, other than as the property of humans.
So, if you want to risk your life or spend thousands to rescue a cat, feel free. I’ll watch. And don’t expect to be able to force me to pay for it.
To: Kommodor
I blame Disney...
HAHAHA!
About 30 years ago there were a bunch of animal rights activists in downtown Seattle protesting a fur shop with a large crowd gathered around. I went in just to bug them. When I came out without a fur, they said, “thank you for not buying fur.” I told them I put it on layaway. ;)
But I tried to walk away but couldn’t resist. I turned around and said to them, “I can see the movie Bambi had a strong influence on you as a child.” and smiled.
That started it. I thought I’d get chewed up and spit out logically, but shockingly, they had nothing but emotion and could not support anything they said. And some of them were in their 50’s and sixties.
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Dogs have owners, cats have staff.
52
posted on
06/03/2019 12:54:03 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: lee martell
Exactly.
Jeez, I can see a tree in one of the photos, that the cat could easily have jumped to. Idiots!
53
posted on
06/03/2019 12:59:48 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(WWG1WGA)
To: Bigg Red
I can see a tree in one of the photos, that the cat could easily have jumped to.
54
posted on
06/03/2019 1:18:53 PM PDT
by
ETL
(REAL Russia collusion! Newly updated FR Page w/ Table of Contents! Click ETL)
To: leaning conservative
“Nothing sexier than a man who is tough & manly, but a marshmallow for animals.”
That’s Me! Too bad I’m ugly enough to nullify the effect.
55
posted on
06/03/2019 1:29:32 PM PDT
by
CrazyIvan
(A gentleman arms himself for the protection of others.)
To: CrazyIvan
Nah, you’re a sweetheart ; )
56
posted on
06/03/2019 1:56:30 PM PDT
by
leaning conservative
(snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: CrazyIvan; ETL
Fire dept? Doesnt the local SWAT team have a sniper?
57
posted on
06/03/2019 2:02:01 PM PDT
by
pax_et_bonum
(Never Forget the SEALs of Extortion 17 - and God Bless The USA and President Trump.)
To: Viking2002
The wife and I have seven and yes, we use a squirt bottle and that takes the curiosity out of them for getting into trouble real fast!
58
posted on
06/03/2019 2:18:36 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
To: ETL
59
posted on
06/03/2019 2:19:44 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
To: jmacusa
Seven? My God, we have to keep two food dishes, an electric drinking fountain, and three litter boxes going just to keep up with five. Of course, the male did pick up the habit of actually peeing in the toilet. He hangs his tuckus over the edge of the bowl. There's a sight to behold. Now, if he'd just learn to flush.........*chuckle*
60
posted on
06/03/2019 2:24:58 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(Free James Woods!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson