Posted on 05/26/2019 1:39:29 PM PDT by McQ444
2020 Democrat Joe Biden was reportedly involved in the early stages of the Russia Probe during his time as vice president in Obama's administration, a newly reemerged report suggests.Biden was allegedly one of the few Obama White House officials to participate in secret meetings during the Obama-era intelligence community’s initial investigations into suspected Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.The information was revealed deep inside a 7,700-plus word Washington Post article published June 23, 2017.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
I’m sure he is.
Hmmmmmm.
That why Numbnuts had no rallies this last week or so. COOKED GOOSE
Waiting for the MSM to explain this away...
And that is precisely why the MSM is pushing the phony polls that he is ahead of President Trump by 10%. He is seeking refuge running.
Maybe Trump can goad Gropin’ Joe into saying something stupid and incriminate himself, or others
He’s always said stupid stuff, but at his age and deteriorating mind, he’s gonna to slip up at some point
They’re all going to claim selective releases and that Trump and Barr doctored the evidence to hide bigger crimes.
That’s all they’ve got left.
It will keep their most rabid followers and donors from jumping ship or going the Sylvia Plath route.
Interesting about no rallies.
And the msm will figure out some way.
They will say he was the VP and needed to be kept up to date.
Even though it started before Trump was even running.
Waiting for humblegunner to chime in.
Biden is An agent of Red China
That why Numbnuts had no rallies this last week or so. COOKED GOOSE
Also, SleepyGroping Joe comes across as an old man with the onset of dementia. Trump was wise to call out Pelosi and Biden as losing it. Every time Biden is shown live, people will look for and notice what an idiot he is and how slow he is.
And McQueeg, of course, peace be upon him. In Hell.
Me too. Guns blazing! Maybe he mellowed a bit. //nah//
Him, Obammy, the chief of the FBI, the chief of the CIA, the head of the Justice Department, Hillary, Bill, and a cast of hundreds were included in this crime!!! Crooks, thieves, bandits, you name them. 98% of Sodom on the Potomac are against Trump. The One Worlders of the Commie Dim Party plus the fools of the RINO-Commie Party aiding them. That is why I left the Republican back when Dub-ya was in his 2d term. That first term opened my eyes to him. I didn’t really know that much about him before the first election. I voted for the republican over that scum from Tennessee. But, after one term of GW I knew I had to be more careful about candidates. From then I was.
When Susan Rice stupidly wrote a CYA memo to herself, she inadvertently confessed to a series of crimes that added the time line and inferences about what the outgoing Obama administration illegally concealed from incoming President Trump and his aides. CYA memos are rarely a good idea. Most often, they reveal things the author never intended——ala Susan Rice’s now-infamous email to herself.
powerlineblog.com
WHY SUSAN RICE WROTE AN EMAIL TO HERSELF........the extraordinary email Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017........within minutes of President Trump’s inauguration must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)?
you read the email, along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d?
Most attention, so far, has focused on the first two paragraphs of the email, which describe a meeting that occurred around two weeks earlier.
The participants included
<><>Barack Obama,
<><>Joe Biden,
<><>James Comey,
<><> Sally Yates–who turns up like a bad penny whenever skulduggery is afoot–
<><>and Rice:
Rice made sure to underscore that Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”.
Rice writes Obama stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.
This is pure boilerplate.
It represents, obviously, the company line. But Rice did not write her email to cover Barack Obama’s rear end. If she or anyone else had wanted to document the claim that Obama said to proceed “by the book,” the appropriate course would have been an official memo that copied others who were present and would have gone into the file. (My guess is that such a memo was written, but we haven’t seen it.)
The important part of the email is not the paragraph that purports to exonerate Obama, but the paragraphs that follow: “From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”
The next paragraph of the email remains classified and has been redacted. The email concludes: The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.
Why did Susan Rice send herself an email purporting to document this part of the meeting? Because she was C’ing her own A. Rice was nervous about the fact that, at the president’s direction, she had failed to “share information fully as it relates to Russia” with President Trump’s incoming national security team.
Her actions violated longstanding American tradition. Outgoing administrations have always cooperated in the transition to a new administration, whether of the same or the opposing party, especially on matters relating to national security.
Susan Rice is far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but she was well aware that by concealing facts ostensibly relating to national security from her counterpart in the new administration–General Michael Flynn–she was, at a minimum, violating longstanding civic norms.
If she actually lied to Flynn, she could have been accused of much worse. So Rice wanted to be able to retrieve her email, if she found herself in a sticky situation, and tell the world that she hid relevant facts about Russia from the new administration on Barack Obama’s orders.
What were the secrets that Obama wanted to keep from the new administration? We can easily surmise that the fact that the Steele memo was paid for by the Democratic Party; that the FBI had to some degree collaborated with Steele; that the Clinton campaign had fed some of the fake news in the dossier to Steele; and that Comey’s FBI had used Steele’s fabrications as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign were among the facts that Obama and his minions didn’t want Michael Flynn and Donald Trump to know. Susan Rice, we can infer, was told to keep these secrets, and if anyone ever asked why she had failed to disclose them to Michael Flynn and others on Trump’s team, or even lied to those people, she would have the defense that President Obama ordered her to do it.
There may be more to it than this. The redacted paragraph likely contains more information about what it was that Rice wasn’t supposed to tell the Trump team. One of these days, we will learn what was blacked out.
The fact that Michael Flynn was Susan Rice’s counterpart in the incoming administration may also be significant. We know that the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn–even Peter Strzok!–reported that they didn’t think he had lied about anything.
And yet, Obama’s DOJ and Bob Mueller’s “investigation”–basically a continuation of Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice under another, less accountable name–persecuted Flynn to the point where he finally pled guilty to a single count of lying to the FBI in order, as he says, to end the madness and the financial drain.
Why were the Democrats so determined to discredit General Flynn? Perhaps because they wanted to pre-empt any outrage that may otherwise have followed on revelations that the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor hid important facts from her successor during the transition, and may have lied to him about those facts, in violation of all American tradition.
Ya gotta ping him
if ya want him to chime in.
(He may have been out back reloading
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.