Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“The Hidden Kingdom” –Ancient Fossil Resets How Life First Arrived on Land from the Oceans
Daily Galaxy ^ | 5/23/19

Posted on 05/24/2019 7:35:12 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Scientists have unearthed fossilized fungi in the remote Northwest Territories of the Canadian Arctic dating back to one billion years, in a discovery that could reshape our understanding of how life first arrived on land from the oceans.

Fungi, the “Hidden Kingdom,” are not plants. Living things are organized for study into large, basic groups called kingdoms. Fungi were listed in the Plant Kingdom for many years. Then scientists learned that fungi show a closer relation to animals, but are unique and separate life forms. Most fungi build their cell walls out of chitin. This is the same material as the hard outer shells of insects and other arthropods. Plants do not make chitin.

Scientists have identified about 120,000 species of fungi so far, reports Carl Zimmer in The New York Times, “but estimate there are as many as 3.3 million species in all. By comparison, all living mammals comprise fewer than 6,400 species. The success of fungi results largely from their unique way of feeding. Rather than absorbing sunlight like plants or devouring other organisms like animals, fungi spew out powerful enzymes. These break down surrounding cells or even rock, which the fungi slurp up.”

For decades, the earliest known fungi—organisms such as mushrooms, mould and yeast—was thought to have appeared on earth around half a billion years ago. But the recent fossil specimens unearthed in Canada and analyzed using the latest dating technology appear to push back fungi’s arrival to the earliest reaches of life on land. Analysis of the rocks showed that these organisms, whatever they were, had fossilized a billion years ago in an estuary, where a river flowed into a sea.

Northwest Territories

On an expedition in 2017, Robert Rainbird, a research scientist at the Geological Survey of Canada, Corentin Loron, a PhD candidate from the University of Liege, Belgium, and their colleagues discovered some peculiar fossils in the rocks. They were composed of spore-like spheres, often joined to long filaments that sprouted T-shaped branches — the kind of shapes found today in fungi.

Rainbird noticed black flecks on a piece of shale. He knew that sometimes flecks like these turn out to be microscopic fossils. “I thought, ‘I should grab some of this stuff, because it looks juicy,’” he said.

Loron examined the microfossils to determine the chemical composition of their cells. They found the presence of chitin—a fibrous substance that forms on fungal cell walls—and examined the age of the rock the fossils were found in by its ratio of radioactive elements. They concluded the microfossils were between 900 million and one billion years old.

Loron said the finding was significant because in the “tree of life”, fungi are part of the same umbrella group of organisms—known as Eukaryotes—as plants and animals. “This means that if fungi are already present around 900-1000 million years ago, so should animals have been,” he told AFP. “This is reshaping our vision of the world because those groups are still present today. Therefore, this distant past, although very different from today, may have been much more ‘modern’ than we thought.”

Fungi are among the most abundant organisms on the planet and are the third largest contributor to global biomass after plants and bacteria. They are six times heavier than the mass of all animals combined—including humans.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: biology; chitin; eukaryotes; first; fossils; fungi; fungus; godsgravesglyphs; land; life; paleontology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2019 7:35:12 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; Fungi

Out of here before the thread deteriorates into crevo flames.


2 posted on 05/24/2019 7:42:23 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
This means that if fungi are already present around 900-1000 million years ago...

1 billion is a newcomer. Diskagma buttonii fossils from S. Africa are dated to ca. 2.2 billion years old.

3 posted on 05/24/2019 7:44:06 PM PDT by Spirochete (GOP: Gutless Old Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Very distant ancestors of humans. Most humans have evolved biologically, but not liberals, who still act as intelligent as fungi.


4 posted on 05/24/2019 7:47:55 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Thanks, seen it, read it, full of holes, not worth the read.


5 posted on 05/24/2019 7:49:16 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: adorno
+1... 👍 Like that...
6 posted on 05/24/2019 7:50:52 PM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: adorno

I know no liberal as a fungi.


7 posted on 05/24/2019 7:58:39 PM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
So Sorry!
8 posted on 05/24/2019 8:03:32 PM PDT by Long Jon No Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

What about Gus?


9 posted on 05/24/2019 8:04:59 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Most Liberals are as sharp as a leading edge of a golf ball!!!


10 posted on 05/24/2019 8:09:56 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Were they marine life, or terrestrial?


11 posted on 05/24/2019 8:23:33 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
I know no liberal as a fungi.

How about a fungiRL?
12 posted on 05/24/2019 8:28:54 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Were they marine life, or terrestrial?

Terrestrial; about the size of a match head, but they grew in clusters like meadows.

There's a wikipedia article on them.

13 posted on 05/24/2019 9:13:37 PM PDT by Spirochete (GOP: Gutless Old Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete
[clusters like meadows.]

I should say, clusters forming a carpet-like ground covering.

14 posted on 05/24/2019 9:16:24 PM PDT by Spirochete (GOP: Gutless Old Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Send a few of the 120,000 species of fungi to Mars... let them do their thing...


15 posted on 05/24/2019 9:37:22 PM PDT by GOPJ (MSNBC bimbos stand WITH illegals against Americans and WITH China against our companies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Ah, one of the culprits in filling our atmosphere with corrosive oxygen.


16 posted on 05/24/2019 9:40:33 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Ah, one of the culprits in filling our atmosphere with corrosive oxygen.

Not fungi! Nope, they're heterotrophs, like animals! That means that they do not photosynthesize, and must instead derive their metabolic energy from other sources, either as symbionts or parasites.

They consume oxygen, and then emit the plant-food carbon dioxide.

Regards,

17 posted on 05/24/2019 9:54:58 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Apparently Diskagna housed a photosymbiont responsible for some of the early oxygenation

Don’t plants require oxygen to metabolize in the absence of light? The net result is more oxygen than carbon dioxide, but they still must metabolize at night.


18 posted on 05/24/2019 10:16:09 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Don’t plants require oxygen to metabolize in the absence of light?

Is that a question, or a claim? Because... Wikipedia is your friend!

The net result is more oxygen than carbon dioxide, but they still must metabolize at night.

If given a chance, plants would consume all of the oxygen they produce (during daylight, by means of photosynthesis).

It's because, on the whole, they don't get that chance - because they die first - that they yield a net plus of oxygen in the atmosphere. However, if heterotrophic organisms like bacteria, molds, insects, or human beings can get to them - i.e., if they aren't effectively isolated from the biosphere by being buried and locked into geological strata before they can rot, etc. - then all of that oxygen will be consumed by the organisms that rot or otherwise consume them.

Regards,

19 posted on 05/25/2019 12:04:24 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gundog

20 posted on 05/25/2019 1:19:15 AM PDT by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC ("Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt" - Pr. Herbert Hoover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson