|
Posted on 05/10/2019 10:42:44 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
EVELYN FARKAS
ADDENDUM PART A
The conversation with Joe and Mika
According to” LeadingAuthorities,”
https://www.leadingauthorities.com/speakers/evelyn-farkas
“ Dr. Farkas appears regularly as an NBC/MSNBC national security contributor to discuss hot-button geopolitical issues. “
LOL! that’s an understatement. The following became quite the hot button issue!
Following is a transcript of the conversation Dr. Farkas had with Joe and Mika which launched the controversy. Did she confirm that “spying” had been done to the DJT campaign? We know now that really and truly she did.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/03/who-the-hell-is-evelyn-farkas.html
Who the Hell Is Evelyn Farkas?
By OSITA NWANEVU
MARCH 31, 20174:47 PM
“…Let’s start from the beginning. Early this month, the New York Times published a story about Obama administration officials working to preserve and disseminate intelligence about Russian efforts to influence November’s election across the government before President Obama left office. According to the article, officials were concerned that some of that intelligence, including intercepted communications from Russians detailing contacts with people in Trump’s circle and information on Russian meetings with Trump associates, would be “covered up or destroyed” by the Trump administration.”
The day after the story was published, MSNBC analyst and former Obama Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia and Ukraine, Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and “people on the Hill” to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I was urging my former colleagues and frankly speaking the people on the Hill—it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people—get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration. Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy that the Trump folks—if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russians—that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence.
So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill.
Re-read that transcript. The following is the description of Farkas’ comments given, weeks after the interview, this Wednesday by Sean Hannity on his radio show:
“If they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff, dealing with Russians, they would try to compromise sources and methods [sic].” What are the three big words of the day that I just told you about—well, four big words? Surveillance. Unmasking. Intelligence leaks. So she’s acknowledging that what Donald Trump tweeted out was correct! So she’s acknowledging there’s surveillance. Again, I go back, “If they knew how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians [sic]” — so she’s acknowledging surveillance, so that means Trump’s right. Check that off in the box….”
The analysis which continues in the Slate article, as one might expect, is spin. We will look at a better analysis in ADDENDUM Part B
END ADDENDUM PART A
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
:)
EVELYN FARKAS
ADDENDUM PART B
Analysis of the conversation with Joe and Mika
A better analysis can be found regarding Evelyn Farkas’ remarks to Joe and Mika in this article from Town Hall which can be found here:
Evelyn Farkas’s Six Revelations about Obama, Trump, and the Deep State
Posted: Apr 02, 2017 12:01 AM
Those six cited items are:
“First, Farkas here acknowledges that the Obama administration, essentially, had indeed been gathering intelligence, or spying, on private citizens.
Second, being the Democrat partisan that she obviously is, Farkas’ intention in making these comments, and making them in the left-friendly venue of MSNBC, was to suggest that the Democrats’ “The Russians Made Us Do It (Lose)” narrative has substance.
Yet, notice, Farkas never said that the intel proved anything so much as resembling “collusion” between Putin or “the Russians” and Trump. Had there been anything there, she would have done what no one has yet to do and offer at least a scintilla of evidence to substantiate this charge.
Third, in fact, Farkas never even mentions any correspondence between Trump and “the Russians.” No, she instead references “Trump folks” and “the Trump staff” when talking about Russia.
Fourth, while Farkas obviously wanted for audiences to think that Obama’s government discovered some nefarious connection between “Trump folks” and those dastardly Russians, the only allusion that she ever manages to make is to the “dealings” that she alleges transpired between these groups.
In other words, Farkas’s wording here is profoundly vague.
Fifth, Farkas unwittingly confesses that she worried about “the Trump folks” discovering “how we knew what we knew….” Is it not eminently reasonable to infer from this statement that the “how” in question, the methods by which intelligence was supposedly gathered, consists of surveillance of the “Trump folks?”
Finally, Farkas admits to being worried about how the Trump administration would react when it found out “how we knew what we knew….” Who is this “we?” Farkas was no longer in the government as of 2015. Yet her choice of words would have us think that she is still very much involved in and allied with bureaucrats in the Deep State. Moreover, given her standing as a Democrat and her position in the Obama administration, it’s all too sensible to think that Farkas’ selection of the first person-plural in this context refers to Farkas and her fellow partisans that remain embedded in the bureaucracy over which her former boss presided.
Farkas has tried retreating from her comments. The left-leaning media has been busy spinning them away. But the cat is out of the bag:
The Deep State, under Obama, surveilled American citizens, in this case, Trump and his “folks.” They wanted the information that they had gathered to be as widely disseminated—leaked—as possible.”
# # # # # #
So as we band of FReeQs, Anons, Freepers, and Lurks have learned, Evelyn spilled the beans, and perhaps without realizing it, proved that there WAS surveillance. That story was very effectively thrown into the Memory Hole by the MSM. Now that the RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! narrative has collapsed, I am wondering if we will be seeing her again. I hope we do. Can her story be pulled out of the Memory Hole?
In the process of this dig, as noted above, I did find some other interesting stuff, especially in the listings of the Rosenthal bunch and Aspen, but perhaps we’ll call it a day for this particular tunnel.
*texokie packs up her gear, ties up the shovels and puts it all on her back, and finds her way to the exit hole. She makes sure she is wearing the extra jacket Mother of Dragons insisted she wear. She finds the hose, and Mother of Dragons is kind to help her take off said jacket and hose her off. Then she helps her put away the equipment into the Qanteen Qloset…. This is no small thing, because Mother of Dragons (and Dragonlets) is the only one who can do that without risking limb and injury. For everyone else, as a routine, it means everything falls on the hapless head (or shovel on shins) of the victim - usually texokie - opening the door. *
End of Five Part dig on Evelyn Farkas, with Addendums A and B
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
you can see this on https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/
see the ID up top circled in red?
Comey is dfeded
https://twitter.com/Speaakn/status/1127757320845504512
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1127768399721979904
The OIG report is due out by end May or early Jun. DECLAS will likely follow. A couple weeks ago, Joe diGenova said a “bombshell” report on Comey was due out in a couple weeks. Will @RepDougCollins release Comey transcript next wk to coincide w/rpt release?
“C comes before D”
https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1127768399721979904
The OIG report is due out by end May or early Jun. DECLAS will likely follow. A couple weeks ago, Joe diGenova said a “bombshell” report on Comey was due out in a couple weeks. Will @RepDougCollins release Comey transcript next wk to coincide w/rpt release?
“C comes before D”
gisd O
Yeah there are two images in the drop when it first came up only the “q boom” image was visible. After I posted it the “Comey moab” image showed up
My in-laws in PA turned me on to Black Conservative Patriot. Dilley too. Both are non-Q but arrive at the same conclusions as we do. Here’s Dilley and Praying Medic doing a podcast that they videoed together recently. It’s an hour and 17 long though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNLChthsSNs
-SB
> Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and “people on the Hill” to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I remember this vividly when it happened. And at my age and level of brain cell recycling that is not an easy feat.
-SB
"The Attorney General of Ecuador has agreed to...deliver to the US all his documents, mobile phones, computer files, computers, electronic storage, CDs and any other device…"
https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/05/12/actualidad/1557671961_425585.amp.html
I’ve been sitting here trying to figure out how Collins could play into this. Why would Q mention Collins and not this Comey OIG report that DiGenova mentioned.
Collins has been releasing transcripts of closed door testimony sessions so what else can he release?
Is DiGenova blowing smoke up my kilt? Only time will tell.
-SB
My in-laws in PA turned me on to Black Conservative Patriot. Dilley too. Both are non-Q but arrive at the same conclusions as we do. Here’s Dilley and Praying Medic doing a podcast that they videoed together recently. It’s an hour and 17 long though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNLChthsSNs
-SB
~ ~ ~ ~. ~
AWESOME!! THANKS SO MUCH!
Snowybear to TEXOKIE
> Evelyn Farkas appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and was asked about the article. Farkas, who left the Obama administration in 2015, told Mika Brzezinski that she had encouraged former colleagues still working in the administration and “people on the Hill” to take part in the effort to preserve intelligence and intelligence sources:
I remember this vividly when it happened. And at my age and level of brain cell recycling that is not an easy feat.
-SB
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ROFL!
Are you sure?
p
> Ecuador has agreed to deliver Assange’s goodies to the US
Praying Medic just retweeted it. Hope they leverage him. Either way he’s got a fart sack and vittles for the forseeable future.
-SB
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
