Posted on 04/18/2019 9:34:05 AM PDT by rickmichaels
When the media “reports” that men are “afraid” of commitment, it’s a continuation of a 50 year trend to mock and disparage men for their reproductive choices.
Men aren’t “afraid” of commitment. When men walk away from “commitment” and marriage, they are making intelligent choices. Fear doesn’t enter into men’s minds when they walk away from women in our “modern” culture.
There was once a time when marriage was an honorable institution. It was not that long ago.
As mankind rose from primitive savagery, to civilizing the world, men were able to bring art, beauty, truth and goodness to the human condition. Marriage was vital to the stability that permitted these advances in humanity.
Marriage was a balanced set of cultural traditions and values in which men and women supported each other, assumed gendered roles that encouraged them to support each other, and, provided a means for men and women to enhance their lives through the synergy of mutual care, respect, responsibility and knowledge for and about each other.
Those days are long gone.
Marriage is no longer an honorable institution. It is simply a device of the neo-Marxist state to exploit men.
Do you think that is an exaggeration?
Let’s ask some straight questions.
What benefits does marriage offer a man?
The answer is that marriage offers nothing to men. At one time, men could enjoy trusting a woman with his love and sexual feelings. Current government regulation, however, has, virtually demonized and criminalized every aspect of men’s feelings and sexuality in, and outside of marriage.
At one time, Men could count on marriages lasting a lifetime. This gave him, his wife and his children stability and the incentive to work together, as a family, for long term benefits and gains.
Now, women file 80% of divorces, within about 8 years of marriage, use the biased and oppressive family courts to strip a man of his children, his life savings, and leave him to twist in the wind without a support network of any kind. Our laws and family court judges are designed to encourage women to get a divorce, alienate the children from their Father’s protection, and, exploit men for the convenience and enrichment of the neo-marxist state . . .
Men are dying from suicide at six times the rate of women in some age categories. We know that one of the reasons is the man-hating (misandry) that saturates our institutions (law, education, military, religion, etc.), and, that the other is that a man loses everything in most marriages. To meet draconian government regulation of marriage, a man must abandon his personal support network of friends, and, when he is divorced, and impressed into the service of the state to pay child support, he no longer has the time or energy to form personal support networks of friends.
Men walk away from marriage and commitment with women out of intellect and common sense choice. “Fear” has nothing to do with it.
There were different kinds of living situaions for different people.
Since I’m not the author, your comical point is moot.
I don’t doubt for a second, however, that the author has, unlike you, a proper understanding of the English language beyond the sixth grade and does not become confused when confronted with two entirely different words with entirely different meanings.
Please explain why you’re illiterate. Do you have a learning disability? Are you inherently ignorant? Are you lazy? Were you dropped on your head as an infant? Was your oxygen supply temporarily disrupted while you were still in the womb? Were you born stupid?
Please identify your problem.
Glued, baby!!! We Avs fans have waited years for this! Hockey heaven. Lots of great hockey and some serious surprises like the TB bracket basher.
Well, your case (if true) is a one in a million example. We need her story.
Just accept that men are basically always at fault. And therapists are always balanced, just like the courts.
Because a psycho wench acts super nice like a cat in heat, gets herself pregnant, then the demons come out and she owns the man for 18 years.
You’re being logical. Stop that! Use your emotions, like school teachers direct.
Her assumption is that, after the woman has screwed all the bad boys, and decides it is "time to settle down" (probably at 39, when the bad boys have moved on to younger candidates), that the good men she rejected in her 20's and early 30's in favor of the bad boys, will have any interest in her high-mileage self.
Many women are disappointed to discover that the probability of ever finding somebody interested in marrying them, drops precipitously after 30. There is a reason for this. A man wants to marry in order to be a father (otherwise, why not just keep dating). A women is more suitable as a mother-candidate at the beginning of her fertile period then when her fertility is almost depleted.
You want to fix marriage, you need to start by fixing divorce. If women did not stand to get "cash and prizes" in divorce court, they would be far less likely to divorce.
In Islamic countries, in divorce the man gets the kids, the man gets the assets, the woman gets an amount that was decided upon at marriage time (and no more).
If women don't watch out, there may come a time when men decide "Why oppose Islam?"
“Because a psycho wench acts super nice like a cat in heat, gets herself pregnant, ——————”
Wow,she gets herself pregnant.
Looking forward to your explanation of how that’s done.
.
You point out an essential truth.
NICE guys lose everything, because the women knows she can destroy him without risk to herself. Often, being the un-suspicious sort, he won't even see it coming, and when it happens he will be too nice to fight for his rights.
Meanwhile, if the guy is a complete SOB, willing to rip her throat out, he will make out OK.
No, they didn't change. Women everywhere want as much as they can get away with. The only difference is that in the old countries, they could not get away with what they can do here.
"Eddieeee, I want to talk to yoooooooooo!"
You are correct in everything you said. What Sandberg said is terrible relationship and life advice for women. Yet, that is what is being sold and pushed in almost every corner of our culture now.
As in, she deliberately deceives him, telling him she's on birth control, while trying hard to get pregnant by a guy who she can hit up for child support payments.
You think that scenario never happens?
It used to be in many states that children born outside marriage were ineligible for child support. This created a strong incentive for the woman to want marriage before sex. Then the Supreme Court struck that down.
“three scariest words in the english language, I’M NOT HAPPY!”
The three most dangerous words for children are “Mommie has a new boyfriend”.
1997 I worked a child murder case. Boy 2.5 years old was scalded by ‘mommie’s boyfriend’ babysitting him while she was out. Perp said he was “punishing him” for “soiling his diapers” so he dunked him in a tub of hot water. My partner interviewed the boy in an OKC hospital and lamented about how all the boy said was “daddy did this to me” saying how the boy just said it over and over and that he didn’t know how he’d put that in his report. The boy subsequently died from bacterial infection. I said to my partner, “so the boy says ‘Daddy did this to me’ and you don’t know how to write that in your report? I told him to write it as the boy’s statement in quotation and write it out the same amount of times the boy said it -eleven times.
The Perp was convicted. I forget the sentence but the Army doesn’t play with murder convictions. I’d have locked the bitch up too.
The moral of this child’d death is: would the father have allowed ANY of this to happen?
Hummmm? Could be
“As in, she deliberately deceives him, telling him she’s on birth control, while trying hard to get pregnant by a guy who she can hit up for child support payments.”
—
OK,so she has sexual intercourse for the privilege of being pregnant for 9 months,going through childbirth, and raising a child for 18 years -——just to collect child support payments.
Why is the man having intercourse?
.
.
“Why is the man having intercourse?”
Exactly. Now you understand MGTOW and Red Pill. Good.
one behind the ear...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.