Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The world's largest plane just flew for the first time
CNN ^ | Thom Patterson,

Posted on 04/13/2019 8:58:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin

[I]n the desert north of Los Angeles, a gigantic, six-engined megajet with the wingspan of an American football field flew Saturday morning for the first time.

Stratolaunch Systems, the company founded in 2011 ... conducted the first test flight of the world's largest plane.

Stratolaunch aircraft is a giant flying launch pad, designed to hurtle satellites into low Earth orbit. It aims to offer the military, private companies and even NASA itself a more economical way to get into space.

The aircraft's wingspan measures 385 feet -- wider than any airplane on the planet. From tip to tail, it's 238 feet long....

The jet, carrying a rocket loaded with a satellite, will take off from Mojave and climb to an altitude of 35,000 feet. There, pilots will launch the rocket from the plane on a trajectory toward space. The plane then will land safety back at Mojave, while the rocket carries the satellite into an orbit ranging from about 300 miles to 1,200 miles above Earth. The rocket deploys the satellite before eventually falling back to Earth, burning up in the sky like a meteor.

Putting small satellites into space via airplanes...eliminates the need for launch pads and all the pricey equipment and infrastructure surrounding a traditional rocket launch... the plane burns less fuel than a traditional rocket when it blasts off from Earth.

Bad weather won't be as much of a problem. Storms can delay a traditional rocket launch, but a jet could simply take off and fly over bad weather -- or around it -- and then launch the satellite.

Launches could take place more frequently and within a faster time frame. No more waiting in line for a slot to open up on a spacecraft blasting off from a traditional terrestrial launch pad.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: albatross; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; losangeles; mojavespaceport; paulallen; spacex; stratolaunch; stratolaunchsystems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last
To: datricker

((Rimshot))

He’s here all week, folks!

CC


101 posted on 04/13/2019 1:47:24 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I mean they might be one day used on us.


102 posted on 04/13/2019 2:39:27 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Is it made of spruce?


103 posted on 04/13/2019 3:00:20 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Inspired by the F-82?


104 posted on 04/13/2019 3:02:31 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: datura

“Hard to imagine the strength of the main spar between the two fuselages.”

Lots of bridge girders, etc., are that strong but NOT THAT LIGHT!


105 posted on 04/13/2019 3:07:11 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Stratolauncher, you are cleared for landing runway 22 left AND 22 right.”


106 posted on 04/13/2019 3:12:08 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy

Could be, I suppose. And the F-82 was the replacement for the Black Widow, also a dual-fuselage configuration.


107 posted on 04/13/2019 3:22:01 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Reminds me of this older model.

108 posted on 04/13/2019 3:42:20 PM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin-fuselage_aircraft


109 posted on 04/13/2019 3:49:49 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (I have a great regard for iridium! To be irregardless should be irregal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

That’s true of everything you use every day of your life.


110 posted on 04/13/2019 4:25:51 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

According to UNOOSA, in history a total of 8,378 objects have been launched into space. Currently, 4,994 are still in orbit – although 7 of them are in orbit around celestial bodies other than the Earth; meaning there are 4,987 satellites whizzing around above our heads every single day.


111 posted on 04/13/2019 5:32:29 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

The article says it’s meant to be a cost-effective platform for launching satellites into space.


112 posted on 04/13/2019 7:10:33 PM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie
but in real life it cries out "catastrophic failure".

That's my take too. It seems like some unexpected weather condition could torque the two fuselages out of acceptable alignment. They'd start vibrating out of control until something broke. But I'm not in that line of work - I hope the engineers knew what they were doing.

113 posted on 04/13/2019 7:22:30 PM PDT by Tellurian (Demonicrats would smugly tell even God "you didn't build that".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

I get it, I was just diving deeper into it.


114 posted on 04/13/2019 8:24:06 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

A lot of things yes, some things (space borne vehicles), make it a lot easier though for bad folks to monitor the good folks.


115 posted on 04/13/2019 8:25:32 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Isn’t Paul Allen, of Microsoft fame, one of the big investors behind this?


116 posted on 04/13/2019 8:49:11 PM PDT by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor

As is ‘spruce goose’?


117 posted on 04/13/2019 9:24:23 PM PDT by GOPJ (Even MSNBC bimbos have stopped using the phrase 'undocumented workers'? IT'S A WIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

China and Russia think it would be great if the US had nothing in space too.

Hint: Space is the ultimate high ground. If space is not at least neutral for your cause, you lose.


118 posted on 04/14/2019 2:49:09 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

This aircraft means that the US can put up replacement satellites for knocked out GPS or surveillance sats in 24 hours or less. Readying a rocket to do that from a surface launch takes weeks if not months.

You do the math on how many US troops would lose their lives in a war without GPS or overhead intel in the intervening time.

PS: The Chinese *openly* have an antisatellite installation that has demonstrated mission kills on orbiting satellites.


119 posted on 04/14/2019 2:53:11 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

There is no other aircraft that can haul a rocket of the expected size to that altitude for launch. Not if you want to reuse the aircraft. The rocket is to sit slung under the wing between the two fuselages.


120 posted on 04/14/2019 2:56:20 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson