Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazon to offer broadband access from orbit with 3,236-satellite ‘Project Kuiper’ constellation
www.geekwire.com ^ | April 4, 2019 at 6:00 am | by Alan Boyle

Posted on 04/04/2019 8:48:25 AM PDT by Red Badger

Amazon is joining the race to provide broadband internet access around the globe via thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit, newly uncovered filings show.

The effort, code-named Project Kuiper, follows up on last September’s mysterious reports that Amazon was planning a “big, audacious space project” involving satellites and space-based systems. The Seattle-based company is likely to spend billions of dollars on the project, and could conceivably reap billions of dollars in revenue once the satellites go into commercial service.

It’ll take years to bring the big, audacious project to fruition, however, and Amazon could face fierce competition from SpaceX, OneWeb and other high-profile players.

Project Kuiper’s first public step took the form of three sets of filings made with the International Telecommunications Union last month by the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Washington, D.C.-based Kuiper Systems LLC. The ITU oversees global telecom satellite operations and eventually will have to sign off on Kuiper’s constellation.

The filings lay out a plan to put 3,236 satellites in low Earth orbit — including 784 satellites at an altitude of 367 miles (590 kilometers); 1,296 satellites at a height of 379 miles (610 kilometers); and 1,156 satellites in 391-mile (630-kilometer) orbits.

In response to GeekWire’s inquiries, Amazon confirmed that Kuiper Systems is actually one of its projects.

“Project Kuiper is a new initiative to launch a constellation of low Earth orbit satellites that will provide low-latency, high-speed broadband connectivity to unserved and underserved communities around the world,” an Amazon spokesperson said in an emailed statement. “This is a long-term project that envisions serving tens of millions of people who lack basic access to broadband internet. We look forward to partnering on this initiative with companies that share this common vision.”

Amazon said the satellites would provide data coverage for spots on Earth ranging in latitude from 56 degrees north to 56 degrees south. About 95 percent of the world’s population lives within that wide swath of the planet.

The United Nations estimates that almost 4 billion people around the globe are underserved when it comes to internet access, which is becoming increasingly important as the world grows more connected.

Some of the world’s best-known companies have been working for years on plans to serve that market.

Last year, SpaceX launched the first two prototype satellites for its Starlink broadband data constellation, which is projected to grow to more than 12,000 satellites in low Earth orbit. SpaceX’s facility in Redmond, Wash., is playing the lead role in the development effort. SpaceX’s billionaire founder, Elon Musk, has said he expects revenue from the Starlink internet service to help fund his vision of building a city on Mars. OneWeb had its first six broadband satellites launched in February, and plans to put hundreds more in place over the next year or two. Last month, the consortium announced a $1.25 billion funding round, led by SoftBank Group, to support the ramp-up in operations. Telesat put its first prototype broadband satellite in low Earth orbit last year, and plans to have hundreds more launched to provide first-generation broadband services in the early 2020s. Facebook, Boeing and Luxembourg-based LeoSat also have laid out plans for space-based internet access.

Internet access is already available via satellites in geosynchronous orbit, such as the constellations operated by Viasat and Hughes Network Systems, but satellites in low Earth orbit are expected to offer advantages in terms of low latency and low cost.

Other ventures are staking a middle ground in the satellite broadband race. One of those ventures, SES Networks, is due to have four of its O3b satellites launched into medium Earth orbit today to boost space-based connectivity.

Amazon didn’t provide a timeline for deployment of Project Kuiper’s satellites or for the start of internet service. Nor did it say how much the service might cost. The service is likely to be associated with the Amazon brand — as opposed to, say, Amazon Web Services. The project’s code name, which pays tribute to the late planetary scientist Gerard Kuiper and the solar system’s far-flung, icy Kuiper Belt, isn’t likely to end up being the name of the service once it goes commercial.

Although the Kuiper satellite coordinates were passed along to the ITU by the FCC, the FCC itself has not yet taken regulatory action on the project. Amazon’s next step will be to submit filings to the FCC and other regulators around the world.

The regulatory process is likely to consider whether Amazon can guarantee that its satellites won’t interfere with the thousands of other satellites expected to operate in low Earth orbit, and that the satellites will be disposed of safely at the end of their operating life without adding to orbital debris.

It’s not clear whether Amazon will manufacture Project Kuiper’s satellites or have an outside vendor make them — which leaves lots of room for jokes about second-day satellite deliveries. Neither is it clear where Project Kuiper will be headquartered — although it’s known that some employees in Seattle are working on the project.

Last November, Amazon Web Services launched a cloud computing service known as AWS Ground Station to facilitate space-to-ground communications, but satellite broadband is likely to require a much more extensive network of earth stations. In a recent FCC filing, SpaceX sought approval for up to a million Starlink earth stations.

The cost of designing, manufacturing, deploying and operating thousands of satellites is sure to run into billions of dollars, but the fact that Amazon’s market capitalization is currently close to $900 billion suggests it can cover that cost.

It so happens that Amazon’s billionaire founder and CEO, Jeff Bezos, has more than a passing interest in space: His Blue Origin space venture is developing an orbital-class rocket called New Glenn that’s due for its first launch in 2021 and could launch bunches of Project Kuiper’s satellites at a time. Privately held Blue Origin, which is separate from publicly traded Amazon, already holds contracts to send broadband satellites into low Earth orbit for OneWeb and Telesat.

An Amazon spokesperson told GeekWire it’s too early to say whether Blue Origin will have a lock on the launch contracts, saying, “We will of course look at all options.”

Love space and science? Sign up for our GeekWire Space & Science email newsletter for top headlines from Alan Boyle, GeekWire’s aerospace and science editor. GeekWire aerospace and science editor Alan Boyle is an award-winning science writer and veteran space reporter. Formerly of NBCNews.com, he is the author of "The Case for Pluto: How a Little Planet Made a Big Difference." Follow him via CosmicLog.com, on Twitter @b0yle, and on Facebook and Google+.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Music/Entertainment; Science
KEYWORDS: internet; satellite; tech; wifi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: DUMBGRUNT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_satellite_constellation


41 posted on 04/04/2019 9:46:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

I don’t know if it re-entered, but while it was in orbit, the Air Force was tracking it.

We had objects as small as a bolt, nuts and washers in our sat catalog. Even some Russkie ejected human waste.

A frozen turd at 14,000 miles an hour can really do some damage!


42 posted on 04/04/2019 9:47:05 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The media is after us. Trump's just in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Wow.

That’s some cool shirt.


43 posted on 04/04/2019 9:49:45 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

At least one of those fool children at google needs to read the book “Eccentric Orbits: The Iridium Story”.

The hard part isn’t putting up and operating the satellites but getting every nation on earth to agree to allocate a common communications spectrum just for this purpose AND to allocate ENOUGH of that spectrum ...

spectrum allocation has ALWAYS been the problem with ALL wireless data communications, and the bigger the area, the more powerful the signal, and the broader the bandwidth the bigger the problems, both technically and politically ...

all of these johnny-come-lately satellite constellation promoters are truly promoting pie-in-the-sky BS ...


44 posted on 04/04/2019 10:04:04 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Amazon, not Google...............


45 posted on 04/04/2019 10:06:35 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

“Iridium satellites are still working. About 20 years, kind of sort of.”

actually, Iridium just finished replacing their entire, original constellation with new and improved satellites ...


46 posted on 04/04/2019 10:06:52 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

“They should buy Iridium (IRDM) and add a box for internet capability to the sats”

The new Iridium satellites already do internet ...


47 posted on 04/04/2019 10:08:46 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

Amazon [Jeff Bezos, the ‘richest man in the world] doesn’t buy ‘used’ stuff....................


48 posted on 04/04/2019 10:09:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Amazon, not Google”

ROTFLOL! I keep getting those two monopolies mixed up!


49 posted on 04/04/2019 10:10:14 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Liberals, they’re ALL THE SAME!.........................


50 posted on 04/04/2019 10:10:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Lol... I suppose it wouldn’t be as large of a write off either.


51 posted on 04/04/2019 10:46:26 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

At least it’s his money, and not mine or yours. So more power to him....................


52 posted on 04/04/2019 10:49:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Iridium II...
Because Iridium I was such a success.


53 posted on 04/04/2019 11:00:38 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Well in a way... All write offs are lost revenue. But... they are sometimes and meant to be an investment towards a better economic situation overall. If write offs are given freely I would rather they be practical and beneficial than just thrown away on some “hobby” with no real practical benefits in exchange as it was designed to do. :)

But I agree, as long as the taxpayers don’t end up subsidizing this in anyway on top of the write offs that is an absolute plus.


54 posted on 04/04/2019 11:01:45 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

400 mile altitude should only add 2ms of latency vs a landline all other things being equal.

Not being geostationary means it has to be omnidirectional. Might be signal quality issues.


55 posted on 04/04/2019 11:05:20 AM PDT by JamesP81 (The Democrat Party is a criminal organization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

LOL!......They just didn’t do it the right way!.................like communism apologists always say...............


56 posted on 04/04/2019 11:05:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
All of which come with a fantastic amount of atmospheric drag. The orbital decay on the first group would give it a life span of only a year (maybe two if there is enough onboard fuel),

At 500 km, orbital decay time is around 10 years, and at 700 km it's around 100 years. I think they picked the altitudes so that the satellites will start re-entering not too long after their expected lifetimes.

57 posted on 04/04/2019 11:06:43 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

Oh, the principle works, Iridium proved that. It’s the long term problems that will eat them alive..................


58 posted on 04/04/2019 11:09:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Their lifespan depends upon their velocity, orbit type (circular or elliptical) and altitude. Given their altitude of 375 miles, their orbital period is 1.6 hours at a velocity of 4.7 miles per second. The drag on that is considerable and unless they put a butt load of fuel on board, it won’t last anywhere near 10 years. If it is a relatively inexpensive satellite, then they will have negligible fuel onboard and last 1-3 years.


59 posted on 04/04/2019 11:21:06 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Iridium just finished replacing their entire, original constellation with new and improved satellites ...

http://investor.iridium.com/2019-02-06-Iridium-Declares-Victory-3-Billion-Satellite-Constellation-Upgrade-Complete

The new ones do NOT reflect the sun, the end of viewing Iridium flares.


60 posted on 04/04/2019 12:41:53 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT ("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson