Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oprah Winfrey takes big financial hit as Weight Watchers stock tanks
Fox ^ | 2/27/19 | Dom Calicchio

Posted on 02/27/2019 1:54:51 PM PST by jeannineinsd

Oprah Winfrey was likely feeling a lot lighter Tuesday evening – in her investment portfolio.

After the stock of WW (formerly Weight Watchers) nosedived in after-hours trading, the wellness company’s single biggest individual investor was down anywhere from $39 million to nearly $48 million, according to reports.

The stock, which was priced around $103 per share last June, sank to about $22 per share late Tuesday, reports said.

The drop followed WW Chief Executive Mindy Grossman’s disclosure to analysts that WW would have fewer members in 2019 than in 2018, the New York Post reported.

Grossman blamed the company’s winter advertising efforts, saying they “did not drive consumers in the way we had hoped.”

“Our marketing … needed to be more weight-loss focused, especially in the January season,” Grossman said.

Winfrey, who famously shared stories of her personal struggles with weight during her days as an afternoon talk-show host from 1986 to 2011, owns more than 5 million shares in WW, according to CNBC, which cited a January filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

That translates to more than 8 percent of the company, Bloomberg reported.

Grossman said Tuesday that Winfrey herself will be featured in WW’s future advertising.

“Looking ahead, I’m happy to say that Oprah Winfrey will play a central role in our upcoming TV and digital marketing campaign for spring, bringing to life a clear message on how WW is the program that works,” Grossman said in a statement. “Together with Oprah, we are also working on an initiative to galvanize and bring together communities through a series of digital and live experiences and events to accelerate WW’s impact and allow us to reach new and diverse audiences.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: oprah; weightwatchers; ww
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: vette6387
...years ago ...

Right. That joke's at least 30 years old.

21 posted on 02/27/2019 2:38:50 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

No, they got a bunch of whizz kids in there, renamed the company, changed its focus, and completely re-vamped the marketing.

Step one in a recovery plan would be to fire everyone associated with the changes and go back to basics.


22 posted on 02/27/2019 2:40:37 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

What? Oprah lost a lot of money? Oh, noes! I haz a sad.


23 posted on 02/27/2019 2:43:05 PM PST by Bigg Red (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Don’t know, but I am guessing that Oprah demanded it so it would be 2 W’s. Her last name is Winfrey.

She has that stupid magazine called “O” for Oprah, and she appears on every single cover! Such an ego.


24 posted on 02/27/2019 2:48:13 PM PST by Bigg Red (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

They changed to “WW” to emphasize that the program is about “more than the numbers on a scale.” They’re pushing WW as Wellness Works, extolling the benefits of healthy food choices, fitness and lower corpulence.

And what did the spokesperson blame for the stock crash? Not emphasizing weight loss enough this winter, D’oh!!! They made a huge point, starting in December, that this wasn’t just about weight loss...

As a member for 7 years, and one who has lost 110+ lbs and kept it off, I thought it was a dumb change of program emphasis...


25 posted on 02/27/2019 2:48:29 PM PST by DJ Frisat ( (optional, printed after my name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
You're right. "WW" is a bad name. It should be "LW".


26 posted on 02/27/2019 2:48:48 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Beau Bridges, in the “The Landlord”(1970), knew!


27 posted on 02/27/2019 2:52:25 PM PST by GOYAKLA (Winning not whining!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Pocket change for her.


28 posted on 02/27/2019 2:55:47 PM PST by skinndogNN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

WW as in “white whale”.


29 posted on 02/27/2019 2:58:40 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

I don’t know from reading this story if I’m supposed to feel bad for her at the loss of millions, or if I’m supposed to feel better about myself because she lost millions.

Neither is true.


30 posted on 02/27/2019 3:03:49 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Weight Watchers is in the middle of a massive identity crisis. They rebranded themselves as a lifestyle company that promotes healthy eating, not a weight loss program, and call themselves WW now. What is the market for paying a company to help you with “healthy eating”? It sounds like a horrible rebrand that was destined to fail and tank the stock. As prior posters point out, you don’t really need to pay a fortune to have some company tell you how to eat healthy. The real value to a Weight Watchers was some level of promise that they were helping overweight people to lose weight.


31 posted on 02/27/2019 3:18:31 PM PST by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Her wallet is a whole lot lighter now.


32 posted on 02/27/2019 3:34:33 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead

She’s made a pretty good living ballooning up and then losing weight endorsing various weight loss diets, schemes, etc over the last 20 yrs or so.

But I think she’s cycled up and down so many times her credibility is low.


33 posted on 02/27/2019 3:40:54 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

I’ve dropped over 40 lbs since 01 Jan.

Didn’t use anything other than common sense and eat less.

This isn’t rocket mechanics.


34 posted on 02/27/2019 4:25:30 PM PST by ASOC (Having humility really means one is rarely humiliated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Oprah started out fat and has stayed fat.
She certainly did not follow the Weight Watchers plan.


35 posted on 02/27/2019 4:27:15 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd; Salvation; Jane Long; caww

OPRAH has yet to realize that her appeal and popularity have taken a larger hit than her Weight Watcher stock!

Ever since OPRAH let her Left-Wing political views be known, she lost half of her fans or followers. She went onto lose even more when her decidedly racial leanings were exposed by no less than she, herself, by regularly taking the black side of controversial black vs white police encounters and black vs black police encounters.

Her stints on cBS’ 60 Minutes didn’t help her popularity either. The “Round Tables” with “voters” that were predictably anti-Trump, soured Trump supporters who, prior to the airing, might have been Oprah fans.


36 posted on 02/27/2019 4:28:11 PM PST by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'SCENTER>AY IS THE WINNING WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd
“Together with Oprah, we are also working on an initiative to galvanize and bring together communities through a series of digital and live experiences and events to accelerate WW’s impact and allow us to reach new and diverse audiences.”

Uh huh. That right there tells me to run the other way. Corporate mumbo jumbo talk.

37 posted on 02/27/2019 5:02:09 PM PST by upchuck (... to be right with God has often meant to be wrong with man. ~ Steve Schmutzer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

And insufferable...


38 posted on 02/27/2019 5:10:33 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
LOL...Remember this? 1988 weight loss....


39 posted on 02/27/2019 5:15:35 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Did she ever marry this guy or is he still just her call guy....


40 posted on 02/27/2019 5:21:56 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson