21st Century problem in the West, lol.
I don't know who's teaching "that they were designed for it," at last not in the last fifty years.
They feel stultified because they always think they can do better than what they've got.
Democrats are evil.
It only works until women are near 50.
Then the tables turn.
Basically, Godless leftist whore with no fulfillment is a Godless leftist whore with no fulfillment.
trying to figure out how the word “stultified” fits here.
"Women" to Wednesday Roberts, are her neighbors in the Park Avenue townhomes she shares with her husband; lawyer, financier and Columbia professor Joel Moser.
It is unlikely she has ever met a Trump voter or stepped into a Walmart.
Take her "research" for what it's worth.
Of course, women unlike men always have interest from the opposite sex no matter how old. Sooner or later one of the flies buzzing around will be tall dark and mysterious enough to trigger their fantasies. I am sure any woman who changed her status to single on FB can attest to this. Men, for the most part, do not have gaggles of attractive women flirting with them daily unless the men are perceived as unobtainable. Unfortunately for the women, for the most part the interest from most of the men buzzing around begins to wane immediately after the clothes hit the floor
Get a dog and leave us alone!
The article misspells slutified.
Idolaters.
Always make them think they won the argument too. 8>)
The article is trying to say that normal, straight women should have sex with other women, other men, and cheat on their spouses.
What a load of crap that article is.
Sounds more like the writer is bored and is trying to justify their own behaviors.
Another symptom of the disease known as affluenza.
People that are forever ungrateful for what they have and have no limit to their hedonistic appetites deserve all the misery they inevitably get.
Never try to understand Women. Women understand women, and they dont like women.
The problem is left-wing women are sexually frustrated, and try to generalize their unhappy, unfulfilling, meaningless lives to all women.
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/paeekv/why-conservatives-have-better-sex-lives-than-liberals
1960’s recycled baloney.
It was garbage then, it is garbage now.
I think women were designed to have many hands making for light work. In the world the way it is, they get dumped on with having tons of chores and not enough time to be able to even enjoy the work that can be equal parts fun.
It is not exclusivity that they have a problem with, it is the atomic family in the place of the more traditional extended family that is the problem. There needs to be support in the form of extended family. Nature did not intend for individuals to move all over the place so that they can have the fruit of their labors systematically milked away from them. Nature supports extended family groups so that the grandparents can look after the kids, the parents of those kids can look after the grandparents, and everyone can pitch in and help when a need to do so presents itself.
The atomic family in the place of the extended family is a recipe for female burnout. I don’t think you are looking at boredom. You are looking at burnout. These are VERY different things. Mistaking burnout for boredom will encourage a remedy that adds to burnout, making matters worse. It would be better to encourage families to stick together and pool their resources to address challenges.