The Slimes printed this execrable piece from a nobody who teaches at a nowhere school because he says what their editorial writers want to say but know they can’t support in a controversy.
There’s money to be made from race hustling. It’s a gargantuan constituency of the Demonrat Party, and it’s been going on since the 19th century. They need to keep certain target groups perpetually aggrieved to maintain power.
As Tuskegee University President Booker T. Washington said... There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.
NYT seems to have a problem with anything culturally white. Not a day goes by where there isn’t an article bashing anything not POC, female, or LGBT.
Dumb asses
So, is the very Jewish NYTimes going to condemn Al Jolson for
“Mammy”.... NO? Why not in this nightmare of PC crapola. “Mammy” was rendered in emotional appreciation of the the cultural figure of the “Mammy”— in history. The Ultimate Matriarch even as she was a house servant— the GLUE that held families together in a difficult time. No one remembers this— and then proceeds to castigate respectful memory of a bygone time, by calling it “condescending”. It was not. Especially not in Vaudeville times (it was, in fact, risque, much as Stephen Foster’s writings for Mr. Christy and his Minstrel Show— about the plight of slaves and that culture in the 1850’s. But still, the City of Pittsburgh found reason..just because, to remove the statue to their respectful Native Son, Stephen Foster... because...racism and all. What absolute horse shiite.)
We all know this is ridiculous and indicative of a very undeveloped and uneducated mind. E.g. it came from someone with an inferior education: a journalist.
We should rejoice, however, in that the idiots continue to expose their idiocy.
Laugh at them and shame them. They do it to us. The difference, of course, is that when we do it to them, it’s logical and well deserved.
Libs need to publish a list of what is NOT racist.
That list would be much shorter than a list of everything they claim to be racist.
A list of things not racist would save the rest of us a lot of time.
[/s]
OMGosh, are they serious? A chimney sweep is racist bc of soot? Way, way, WAY off the deep end. Disturbingly so.
Clearly chimney sweeeps would never have dark stuff on their faces, there's no other explanation. Obvious minstrel act. These guys are probably even singing "Mammy" too, I'd guess.
Does the New York Times use that shameful black ink?
Filthy, stinking racists.
These people have descended into pure madness.
This is all so stupid, it’s ridiculous. There’s an AMERICAN tradition of black face players, I don’t think there’s an English or Australian one, unless it relates to Coal Miners. Travers was an Aussie, if anyone doesn’t know that. And my guess is that coal dust isn’t that easy to wash off, I bet you’ve got to really scrub. But these snowflakes today, they don’t do nothing that requires any physical exertion at all. They need to scrub their minds and souls. God help them, I mean it.
Government funds and misuse of endowments.
They were damned chimney sweeps.
Chimney sweeps.
Unbelievable. Chimney sweeps had black grit all over their faces because it is what they do. It has absolutely zero to do with “blackface” in a racial sense.
WTF. Are we going to have to edit “October Sky” to remove the black dust on faces?
These people are mentally ill. MENTALLY ILL.
Its real there is a Bizzaro world and we are in it.
The NY Times fired off a whole bunch of editors and writers so they are having to find hacks to fill their papers.