Posted on 01/22/2019 10:48:08 AM PST by re_tail20
Bible scholars have claimed there is evidence that suggests the peak Jabal al-Lawz in the Middle Eastern kingdom is actually Mount Sinai.
The site is a 8,460 foot peak known as the "mountain of almonds", located in north east Saudi Arabia near the border with Jordan.
Moses leads the Israelites to the mountain which is enveloped by fire, smoke and thunder, according to the Book of Exodus in the Bible.
The prophet then ascends Mount Sinai where he convenes with God to receive the Ten Commandments.
Experts from the Doubting Thomas Research Foundation have backed the location of Sinai, and also pointed out the fact it lies right in the footprint of proposed Saudi mega city Neom.
Neom is a project proposed by Riyadh that would cover 10,200 square miles - 33 times the size of New York - and would end up covering the suspected Holy site from the Bible.
Security analyst Ryan Mauro and the Doubting Thomas Research Foundation released a documentary with detailing their evidence of Sinai in Saudi Arabia.
It is claimed there is proof of the Israelites encampment at the foot of the mountain, which also has a blackened peak as if it was set on fire.
Historians and Biblical scholars remained divided on the location of the real Sinai in the Middle East.
However, the researchers and explorers fear its location could never be found if the Neom project bulldozes the area.
In the documentary titled Finding The Mountain of Moses: The Real Mount Sinai in Saudia Arabia, they lay out their case for Sinai and highlight the risk posed by Neom.
Mauro said: “The Saudis are constructing a super city that is planned to be 33 times the size of New York.
“If all of us don’t take action, Saudi construction in the...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailystar.co.uk ...
WRONG! From Mount Sinai is NOT Jebel al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia:
THE EXODUS CHALLENGE
Bob Cornuke and Larry Williams are self-proclaimed “Adventurers of History.” This challenge will be the ultimate adventure to validate their claims that Mt. Sinai is in Saudi Arabia.
The Conditions
They are to take two ten-year-old children. (Please get a parental consent form signed by both parents. I do not want you to be hauled into court for child abuse). Also bring along two sheep and two goats.
They will be permitted to buy bottled water along the way. I do not want to be responsible for their death by dehydration!
In the event that the pillar of cloud/fire does not reappear, they will be permitted to use road maps and their good judgments as to the timing so as to cover the 350 miles, averaging 58 miles per day, in the allotted time.They will not have to take 2 million men, women or children with them, nor a herd of cattle, a flock of sheep and herd of goats.
The Concessions
They will not have to bring along any nursing mothers with newborn children.
They will not need to bring along senior citizens. Remember, Moses, Aaron and Miriam were all more than 80 years old.In the unlikely event the challengers are successful, after being observed by a neutral party and documented on video, I (Gordon Franz) will publicly and in print, renounce my articles against the idea that Mt. Sinai is at Jebel al-Lawz and will wholeheartedly endorse their views. I will also donate $1,000 to the BASE Institute.
The Promise
In the likely event of failure, I will let them decide what their course of action will be.
Ken Durham called this an “intentionally frivolous challenge”! (Letter from Durham, Sept. 7, 2001, p. 7). With all due respect, I am very serious about this challenge because if they walk it, they will abandon the idea because they will know (experientially) that it is impossible. He also objected to placing Rameses at Tell el-Dab’a and would prefer to see it in eastern Goshen. As they say at Burger King, “Have it your way!” I am willing to let you start from the eastern end of the Wadi Tumilat and go the 250 miles you think was the distance.
Durham says, “A steady walking rate of 3.5 miles per hour sustained for 12 hours of navigable daylight results in a ‘days journey’ optimal linear distance of 42 miles. … Therefore, as odd as it may sound to our ears to reckon a ‘day’s journey’ as 42 to 43 miles, it is probably very close to the optimum of the Exodus Hebrews” (Letter from Ken Durham, September 7, 2001, p. 14). He then sets forth his scenario for the distance traveled each day (pp. 13-15). On the first day they traveled 36 miles. The second, 36 miles and camped at Etham, but he does not identify where Etham was located. On the third day they pick up the pace to 16-18 hours per day and travel 45-48 miles. The fourth day they cover 48 miles. The fifth day they cover 40-45 miles, and the sixth day another 45-50 miles. On Shabbat they rested. If they can walk those distances each day, I would be impressed. What really stretches the imagination is his reckoning of the Egyptian forces. Pharaoh had spies following the Israelites for three days. On the third day when they realize the Israelites are not stopping, they return to Pharaoh by the fourth day so he can muster his chariot force and foot soldiers in order to pursue the Israelites. Those spies would have to run back overnight to Pharaoh covering a distance of approximately 120 miles in less than 12-16 hours (running a steady 10 miles per hour!). If Pharaoh were successful in mustering his troops in one day, they would have three days to catch up to the Israelites. They would have to average 83 miles per day, on foot and in chariots, in order to cover the 250 miles in three days! Anybody want to join them?
Lots of hype in this article. The concept is a luxury seaside resort in the same region the Israelis and Egyptians have resorts. I seriously doubt that means going inland to build on the mountain.
Read the book. It's cheap and enlightening. After you read it, then refute it. I had always thought Sinai, which is a name of more recent provenance, couldn't be right because the Bible puts the Holy Mountain in Midian which is located in the Bible on the other side of the Red Sea. The designation of the mountain at the tip of the Sainai Peninsula was designated as Moses's Holy Mountain by a seer (that's a medium) in the 16th century. From that "revelation" came the construction of St Catherine's Monastery ther.
Both incidents happened on one Holy Mountain.
Both incidents happened on one Holy Mountain.
If this new city is is supposed to be 33 times larger than NYC, than that would mean that it would has close to 300 MILLION residents?
St Catherine's has been there since the 6th Century (Byzantine times), and has been called the site of the Burning Bush / Mt Sinai since at least the 4th century.
NYC has a lot of multistorey domiciles (apartment buildings and towers, condos, etc).
I remember Ron Wyatt’s vids about this.
Check this out -- Ron Wyatt was a liar and con man.
All the Wyatt claims have already been debunked, and none of the new claims are actually new. The column isn't from Solomon's time, it's Roman. The ruins near the Mountain of Almonds? Nabataean. There is no "land bridge". There are no ancient Egyptian chariot wheels, still on their axles, at the bottom of the Gulf of Aqaba.
Obviously you were not swayed by the sound logic of that challenge.
Believe what you want, but no, as a matter of fact, they are not.
Link to your proof.
The proof is everywhere, but since you're mired in Ron Wyatt's cons, there's no point in further conversation about it, you're a hopeless stooge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
