[ETL]

[ETL]

String Ping!

[SkyDancer]

I was told that gravity is just a statistic ... but I don’t want to test it.

[BradyLS]

What is it that gives the String Theory its name?

[faucetman]

“Gravity is mathematically relatable to dynamics of subatomic particles”

I KNEW IT!!!! /s

[BipolarBob]

I was just on the cusp of proving my unification theorem until I ran across unobtainium which blew it all to smithereens.

[Wuli]

I knew it was a too good to be true “breakthrough” when I first saw “string”.

When humans or human made hard-physical-technology actually brings back empirical evidence of a “fifth” or “X” dimension at the as-we-know-it-physical level, then and only then will “string theory” rank a “proof” and its use beyond some wholely theoretical mathematics be warranted.

[A Navy Vet]

Is there observational proof? Or is this math on a white board that is often proven wrong by the next calculation. I thought string theory was a dead end.

[A Navy Vet]

So, physicists now know what gravity is? Is that the point?

[sparklite2]

tl;dr, though lord knows I tried.

[sauropod]

bkmk

[Fido969]

My physics professor described gravity (in the 1970s) as an effect of relativity - as am object gets closer to a massive object, time tends to slow down. So a randomly vibrating particle will slow down as it moves toward the center of mass, and so has less velocity to move away from the center of mass. On average, particles will therefore move toward the center of mass, hence the effect we observe as gravity.

[Fresh Wind]

[bkopto]

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=10722

[minnesota_bound]

What we need around here is a Wesley Crusher to dumb it done enough for me to understand.

[Swordmaker]

Gravity explains very little of what we observe in the universe, so little in fact, that every new observation leaves orthodox gravity theory cosmologists surprised, baffled, shocked and always without a rational explanation that does not require ther mathematical invocation of "dark" invisible and undetectable magical particles and energy to balance their oh, so beautiful descriptive theoretical multidimensional, but not real-world, equations. On the other hand, plasma/electric Universe cosmologists, who propose electromagnetism as the driving force of the cosmos, a force thirty-nine orders of magnitude stronger than gravity and equally infinite in range, have suggested a theory and model of gravity which works and explains all of the anomalies the orthodox gravity cosmologists theories cannot. . . without resorting to invoking any magic. — Electric/Plasma Universe PING

Gravity in an Electric/Plasma Universe — YouTube

Clear Example of a Birkeland Current
"Z" Pinch with Symmetrical Plasmids
Gravity Driven Cosmology has no rational explanation for these objects
seen in Hubble Telescope View of
The Twin Jet Nebula
ELECTRIC/PLASMA UNIVERSE PING!

If you on or off the Electric/Plasma Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.

[mikrofon]

Bohemian Gravity

[thoughtomator]

reads like a sales brochure

[Fzob]

Bump for later

[samtheman]

Interesting

[Eddie01]

I didn’t see Sheldon Cooper’s name mentioned...