Posted on 12/02/2018 5:13:05 AM PST by LibWhacker
Have you ever stopped to wonder exactly how much light has been produced by all the stars in the Universe, over all the time that has passed? Well, now you can wonder no more. An international team of astronomers has actually calculated the amount of starlight in the cosmos.
And it's teaching us new things about the early years of our Universe. In the time since the Big Bang - roughly 13.7 billion years - our Universe has produced many, many galaxies, and many more stars. Perhaps around two trillion galaxies, containing around a trillion-trillion stars. For decades, scientists have known that knowing how much light these stars have produced over the course of the Universe's lifespan would be a powerful tool for understanding the early Universe, as well as the history of star formation. But, well, it's not exactly an easy thing to measure. While there are a lot of stars out there, producing many photons, space is incredibly vast, and starlight incredibly dim. There's also interference from zodiacal light and the Milky Way's own faint glow. The Universe's starlight cannot really be observed directly. But astrophysicist Marco Ajello of Clemson University and his team discovered an indirect method of quantifying starlight. They used gamma ray photons. "These are photons that are high energy, typically a billion times the energy of visible light," Ajello told ScienceAlert.
"While travelling through space, gamma rays can be absorbed through interactions with starlight photons. And if there are many starlight photons, there will be more absorptions; so we can count the number of absorptions that we see to understand the density of the starlight of the photon field between us and the gamma ray source." Using nine years' worth of data from NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, Ajello and his team analysed the light from 739 blazars (strong gamma-ray sources) throughout the Universe to determine the rate of absorption into the extragalactic background light (EBL), the Universe's accumulated background radiation. This gave them the density of starlight photons in the EBL - and, because the blazars are at different distances, they were able to do so across a range of time periods. Once they accounted for and subtracted light from other sources, such as the glowing accretion discs around supermassive black holes, they could multiply this density by the volume of the Universe to arrive at the number of photons produced by stars since the beginning of time.
"We basically have a tool, like a book, to tell the stories of starlight across the history of the Universe, and finally we found it, and we can just read it," Ajello said. "So we did. We measured the entire star formation history of the Universe." It is pretty simple to explain, but it was painstaking and complex to actually do. It took the team three years - and it was worth it. We now know that, as of the time Fermi's data was collected, the Universe's stars had produced 4x1084 photons. Do you need that spelled out? Here: 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Yep, it's a four followed by 84 zeroes. That's a pretty cool trivia fact, so file it up your sleeve for later. But you bet the science actually gets much cooler. Because that cool number actually lifts the veil on a particularly mysterious time in our Universe's history - the Epoch of Reionisation, which started around 500 million years after the Big Bang. We often hear the term "holy grail" chucked around, but the EoR really IS one.
It's basically when the Universe's lights switched on. Before the EoR, space was opaque. Then something came along and ionised all the neutral hydrogen, so that radiation - including light - could stream freely through the Universe. "With our measurement, we can reach the very first billion years of the Universe, and that's a very interesting time of the Universe, so distant from us that all the really powerful telescopes can't really see. The objects there are so far away and so faint that we can't really see them. Instead, we still see the light from those objects," Ajello explained. The team found two things of note in that time: a very large number of UV photons, which was expected for the reionisation process; and that the sources of those UV photons were populations of irregular galaxies - small, blobby, asymmetrical galaxies that produce a lot of UV radiation. These could be the drivers behind reionisation. It's expected that the James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled for a 2021 launch, could tell us more about the EoR. Meanwhile, Ajello and his team are going to apply their book of the stars to a deeper study of the cosmos - such as the rate of the Universe's expansion, the Hubble constant, which has been really difficult to pin down. "It turns out our measurement is very sensitive to the expansion rate of the Universe," Ajello said. "This can be used to make a measurement of the Hubble Constant right now, so that's something that we're going to do." The team's research has been published in the journal Science .
Scientist? (...count all the bees in the hive...la...la...la)
separate the light from the darkness
That number is so enormous all the photons emitted in the universe since the article was written hardly affects it.
Out of fairness to the poster, I’ve gone my whole life without wondering about this.
Though I sometimes wonder why there are no “B” batteries.
Creationists don't actually calculate anything. They just say, "Because God said so." which is the same answer that Muslims give.
42 was Sheldon’s mysterious number on an episode of The Big Bang Theory.
Start your premise, hypothesis, career with an unknown, then proceed as govt grants (other peoples money) allow.
I aint gonna read it because it was flawed at its inception. Kinda (exactly) like that Globull Warming/Man Made Climate Change thingy.
Oops...it was 43. But I’m sure these guys are off a little bit, too.
LOL. No taxpayer’s money funded the study, right ? Somewhere women and children will benefit, right ? Would have been better if the money had gone to valley of kings exploitation of Mars instead of funding lies
I’m with you, LL. I’ve never thought about it either. But even after that knowing this number would provide astronomers with a “powerful tool for understanding the early universe and the history of star formation,” he’s not interested. Might as well turn your brain back in to your Maker... “Here you go, Father, thanks but no thanks. I don’t really need this.”
Wow! No wonder it's so dark at night.
I’m just waiting for the day that I can see Uranus.
Well, all I have to say is that 10^84 is a really, really big number.
Wrong , what a horrible analogy . This group of people “guesstimated” to the best of their ability a number that is subject to change and (as far as I can see) has no practical application whatsoever rather than to spur idle conversation , I digress . Christians realize that God is the creator and his son our saviour suffered for our sin so as to create a path to rekindle our relationship with God . Now , muzzies on the other hand do not recognize Jesus as the son of God and do not promote forgiveness in any manner . The two are not and never will be on the same level as one is the key to life where as the other is a militaristic/political theocracy ..... science actually proves this just by the actions of the muzzies since their self-proclaimed allah started his pillaging and killing .
Actually there are B batteries but not commonly used in the US. Europeans uses them in some specialty items.
Did you just compare Christians and moslems? Lol.
I do like a good sense of humour.
Maybe the author’s mind was blown, but this is simply an exercise in math by a bored astronomer and is at best, a very rough guess.
Notable Properties of Specific Numbers (really big numbers)
http://mrob.com/pub/math/numbers-19.html
Sheldon's writers, like much of Hollywierd today, just stole the idea. Hopefully they gave proper attribution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.