What is so "repugnant" about terminating embryos for intelligence if doing it for a host of other reasons, for example, gender and genetic disease, is a ok? Eugenics never went away it just laid dormant until the technology came along to make it "cleaner" and allow parents to do it.
1 posted on
11/15/2018 7:57:58 AM PST by
C19fan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: C19fan
This will be the end of professional sports. And maybe the Democrat party.
To: C19fan
I see a problem here. If they do deselect babies with mental difficulties and low IQ’s then how will they sustain the liberal democratic base???
To: C19fan
I believe abortion si/was the offshoot of eugenics.
To: C19fan
It compares ultrasounds of the fetus with pictures of Nancy Pelosi.
To: C19fan
Oh no. They will be a Democrat!
7 posted on
11/15/2018 8:02:37 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
To: C19fan
Look at how powerful Planned Parenthood has become today, and you realize that the Germans may have lost World War II, but the Nazis sure won.
8 posted on
11/15/2018 8:03:55 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
To: C19fan
Stephen Hawking wouldn’t see the light of day.
To: C19fan
They’re being optimistic there.
They may/could also predict the predisposition of an embryo to be homosexual/transexual/etc., and that could eliminate a huge voting block for democrats.
12 posted on
11/15/2018 8:08:32 AM PST by
adorno
To: C19fan
....yeah,but they have ears like Odungo....smell like Hilda,...and lie ....like the media
13 posted on
11/15/2018 8:09:13 AM PST by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73....8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: C19fan
Adolph would have loved this!
14 posted on
11/15/2018 8:12:55 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
To: C19fan
If Democrat women start making exceptions to what they have heretofore believed to be sacrosanct, which is a woman’s so-called right to choose, then they’re on the slippery slope to questioning the entire premise. A blob of tissue doesn’t have intelligence at all. It may be that there’s a silver lining to this, but I’m not holding my breath, we are talking about Democrats here. They do love their baby killing.
To: C19fan
Saw the movie....
17 posted on
11/15/2018 8:14:38 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: C19fan
Half of all babies are below average.
19 posted on
11/15/2018 8:25:08 AM PST by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: C19fan
... tests which can pick out 'mental disabilities'...Mental illnesses like homosexuality or liberalism?
21 posted on
11/15/2018 8:38:14 AM PST by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: C19fan
23 posted on
11/15/2018 8:43:32 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
To: C19fan
Eliminating the low IQ segment of society sounds pretty good. It would reduce the democrat population by at least 75 percent.
24 posted on
11/15/2018 8:46:24 AM PST by
euram
To: C19fan
Ok, I'm anti abortion. The only reason needed now is 'inconvenience', a baby simply isn't wanted,right? So here's a reason that's supposed to make abortion WORSE?
It's not like there won't be enough low IQ people who want kids like them, or who even care what the IQ level will be.
I'm just trying to understand how killing a living, helpless human baby is worse because of the reason for wanting it dead. How is 'I don't want a stupid/gay/Downs/handicapped/redhead child so abort it' worse than 'I don't want any baby, healthy or not'? The end result is a dismembered, dead human being and it's wrong to call that wrong.
25 posted on
11/15/2018 8:47:42 AM PST by
ClearBlueSky
(ISLAM is the problem. ISLAM is the enemy of civilization.)
To: C19fan
I don’t know how much the new tests cost, but for pennies on the dollar I can predict low IQ for offspring by merely looking at pictures of the parents. Throw in writing samples, and we’d be up to 99.99999 accuracy.
How about $10 a test? And for $5, I’ll gladly answer the question for couples BEFORE they breed.
To: C19fan
27 posted on
11/15/2018 8:57:18 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Is Central America emptying its prisons?)
To: C19fan
31 posted on
11/15/2018 9:00:41 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Is Central America emptying its prisons?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson