Who cares? What’s one more? He got away with the others. Nobody cared then.
Take a number.
Wow, Clinton was more of a horn dog than we knew. What disgusting behavior toward a 20 year old woman.
The contrast between her and Fraud Ford is amazing. She is articulate, talking in an almost clinical adult voice recounting in detail everything that happened. The interviewer did a great job, too.
Her story is credible. Notice how she remembers every detail.
bump
The #MeTooers are going to destroy this woman.
Sorry, but until I hear the little fragile baby voice, I’m not buying it. /s
I’ve heard this account before. But I’m glad it out there again.
Who cares?! And I mean this sincerely, move on. Tired of everyone beating up on and stuck on Bill Clinton. He is not on the ballot next month, most people don’t care. The ones that do already know and have made their decision. Bill Clinton was popular, regardless of his faults. Harping on Bill Clinton will, I suspect, only hurt Republican vote levels.
For the sake of fairness and equal treatment, her story needs to be verified.
I agree, she sounds much more credible than Blasy-Ford. But it needs to be verified.
Let’s see if she’s believed.
I'd want to know where was his security detail? In testimonies by other women (Broaddrick, Jones), Bill got the security detail to make the approach and then led the women to him. Was this perhaps his earlier approach and he refined it as the decade went on? It sure seemed he would have had a difficult time being completely alone.
Are there any surviving clips of her interviewing him? Are they shot in such a way that we can see his facial expressions and responses to her questions?
Does she come across in the interviews as a fawning groupie or a focused journalist? Was he ever accompanied by Hillary during these 20+ interviews?
Are there any people who worked at the station who could verify any part of her story?
My point is that I don'r want to be selective in my belief of women accusers based on whether the male is Democrat or Republican. I want it to be because her recital of the facts seems truthful, she has some physical evidence or corroborating witnesses to back up her story even if they weren't there for the actual crime and finally, does the man in question have any past history of such behavior?
Let’s see if Murkowski, The Hawaiian H(iron)o, Spartacus and others rally round her and incite the robot-women-horde to action....