1 posted on
10/09/2018 10:23:42 AM PDT by
dayglored
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Abby4116; afraidfortherepublic; aft_lizard; AF_Blue; amigatec; AppyPappy; arnoldc1; ATOMIC_PUNK; ...
2 posted on
10/09/2018 10:24:31 AM PDT by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: dayglored
files not being where they had left them... What a polite PC way of saying they were permanently clobbered with no ability to recover them.
3 posted on
10/09/2018 10:32:25 AM PDT by
C210N
(Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
To: dayglored
Microsoft yanks the document-destroying Windows 10 October 2018 Update (#1809)Micro$haft should yank Windows 10 back so far it becomes Windows 7.
4 posted on
10/09/2018 10:35:28 AM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
To: dayglored
Don’t the software people check out updates before sending them out?
5 posted on
10/09/2018 10:37:46 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: dayglored
My main computer is a VISTA.
I will upgrade when it dies.
6 posted on
10/09/2018 10:38:53 AM PDT by
CIB-173RDABN
(I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
To: dayglored
As I understood disabling TCP/IP v6 causes the problem?
7 posted on
10/09/2018 10:39:09 AM PDT by
ImJustAnotherOkie
(All I know is what I read in the papers.)
To: dayglored
10 posted on
10/09/2018 10:52:10 AM PDT by
Pollard
(If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
To: dayglored
Is that the reason?
My win10 tablet rebooted about 4 different times yesterday.
MS does NOT have a stellar history with updates; thus its forcing win10 updates always causes me to wonder which update will crash the tablet.
11 posted on
10/09/2018 10:59:25 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: dayglored
The Keystone Koders strike again!
What, are you hiring Antifa arson boys? Chinese Feinstein spies? Russian Putin poisoners?
13 posted on
10/09/2018 11:06:41 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Kill-googl,TWITR,FACBK,NYT,WaPo,Hlywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
To: dayglored
I think this might also have affected my Win7 machine. I use Microsoft Office online version and this morning all my pdf file icons were different and files were missing. Not enough time this morning to sort it out though.
To: dayglored
One guy on zdnet said, "I have just updated my windows using the October update (10, version 1809). It deleted all my files of 23 years in amount of 220GB. This is unbelievable."
Yes, believe it. Didn't you back them up?
16 posted on
10/09/2018 11:16:18 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Kill-googl,TWITR,FACBK,NYT,WaPo,Hlywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
To: dayglored
I like the OS but the changeover to quarterly major upgrades has been a disaster due to consistently poor testing and QA. The Windows Insider program was supposed to help this by placing prototypes in the hands of a population more diverse than that of the test labs but it did not appear to turn this one up. If I were Microsoft I'd be thinking about changing the entire paradigm of taking major portions of their user population through trauma four times a year - yes, the old system of monthly patching was cumbersome but it didn't require gigabyte-sized downloads and so many changes all at once that they're impossible to isolate, and if a bad one turned up - it happens - it could be rolled back individually.
I was on a tightly metered connection for about a year and four times a year I would have to decide which of my (then) four computers I could allow to talk to the Internet at all, lest they be hijacked by the mandatory update process and my monthly allowance used up in a single download. Allowing the user to say No to this (it's in networks/metered connections) only means that the user will be running without a possibly vital security update. This system simply isn't flexible enough and it ought to be redesigned from the ground up. IMHO.
To: dayglored
Win 7 Pro x64 forever user here. {Chuckle.}
18 posted on
10/09/2018 11:20:24 AM PDT by
upchuck
(... if we didn't have to spend time raising campaign money, things would be different ~ CongressmanX)
To: dayglored
.
>> “files not being where they had left them. <<
That was what bugged me about win 7.
They mess with the directory structure.
20 posted on
10/09/2018 11:31:57 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: dayglored
< having gone directly into the hands of users rather than spending some time in the Windows Insider Release Preview ring first.So skipping a key real-world testing point led to a bad result. I guess no one at Microsoft was smart enough to figure out that risk.
I wonder if this is related to the Cisco fiasco a couple of weeks ago.
23 posted on
10/09/2018 11:36:00 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: dayglored
Windows is getting more lame with each update.
To: dayglored
It destroys documents?
Was Hillary running this?
To: dayglored
What did people EXPECT, when they went to the ‘cloud’?
38 posted on
10/09/2018 12:45:56 PM PDT by
BobL
(I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
To: dayglored
In less than 10 words, can anyone explain the reason why Windows has gone from reliable and affordable with almost zero updates required - to a steaming pile of pig poo that is so unreliable and a major hassle that lots of people are turning elsewhere?
I mean, what happened?? Why?? It was an excellent product. Why can’t they repeat Vista or the like? What are they doing?
To: dayglored
As far as I am concerned they should yank win 10 altogether and restore win 7.
43 posted on
10/09/2018 3:25:47 PM PDT by
Wuli
(u)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson