Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese warship in 'unsafe' encounter with US destroyer, amid rising US-China tensions
CNN ^ | 1:21 PM ET, Mon October 1, 2018 | Barbara Starr and Ryan Browne,

Posted on 10/01/2018 12:12:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin

A US Navy ship had an "unsafe" interaction with a Chinese warship Sunday while the US vessel was conducting a freedom of navigation operation near the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, causing the US ship to maneuver "to prevent a collision," according to US defense officials.

"A (People's Republic of China) Luyang destroyer approached USS Decatur in an unsafe and unprofessional maneuver in the vicinity of Gaven Reef in the South China Sea," Capt. Charles Brown, a spokesman for US Pacific Fleet, told CNN in a statement confirming the incident.

Brown said the Chinese warship "conducted a series of increasingly aggressive maneuvers accompanied by warnings for the Decatur to depart the area."

He added that the Chinese destroyer "approached within 45 yards" of the front of the US ship, adding that the Decatur "maneuvered to prevent a collision."

"Our forces will continue to fly, sail and operate anywhere international law allows," he said.

This incident comes amid heightened US-China tensions over a broad range of issues. Chinese ships often shadow US vessels during freedom of navigation operations but those interactions are usually considered safe.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: china; internationalwaters; navy; redchina; spratlyislands; usn; ussdecatur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2018 12:12:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Admiral Wang Wei?


2 posted on 10/01/2018 12:16:12 PM PDT by donozark (There are no flamingos in Venezuela.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

45 yards?

That’s way close. Stupid close.

I was in the Arctic and we were operating in the ice with a Canadian Icebreaker, the Grosilliers.

Our captains were trying to figure out who’s dick was bigger and started doing stupid things in the ice. The Canadian breaker came within about 50 yards of our stern breaking ice at about 10 knots.

Good thing he knew his ice. Multiyear ice tends to toss the boat to one side of your trackline or the other.


3 posted on 10/01/2018 12:16:37 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

4 posted on 10/01/2018 12:17:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It’s past time for a luyang destroyer to meet the bottom of the ocean.


5 posted on 10/01/2018 12:17:25 PM PDT by chief lee runamok (mongrel at large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Admiral Ping Koh


6 posted on 10/01/2018 12:18:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Type 053C PRN:

USS Decatur


7 posted on 10/01/2018 12:18:36 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (Quit calling them liberals, progs, socialists, or democrats. Call them what they are: COMMUNISTS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Sounds like the old "chicken games" between the 6th Fleet and the 5th Eskadra ...


8 posted on 10/01/2018 12:22:45 PM PDT by BlueLancer (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. (G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Time to make a call to the “silent service” and disappear the ChiCom destroyer


9 posted on 10/01/2018 12:25:11 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

For anyone in the know: would the us vessel be at battle stations with such a provocative act by the Chinese?


10 posted on 10/01/2018 12:29:23 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Yes. GQ would be set. They may decide to set a condition on it, but probably not.

Done right, the collision alarm would have been triggered, which would have meant the repair lockers would have been manned.


11 posted on 10/01/2018 12:35:01 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
The Type 052D destroyer (NATO code name Luyang III class, or Kunming class:


Processing systems:
H/LJG-346A multifunction active phased array radar
Anti-stealth H/LJQ-517B radar with Yagi antenna
H/LJQ-364 low altitude and surface search radar
H/LJQ-366 over-the-horizon surface search & targeting radar
H/LJP-349 fire control radar for close-in weapon systems
H/LJP-344A phased array fire control radar for main gun
H/SJD-9 hull mounted active/passive sonar
H/SJG-206 towed array sonar
ESS-1 variable depth sonar

Armament:
1 × H/PJ-45A 130mm dual purpose gun
64 VLS
CY-5 series ASW missiles
CJ-10 LACM
YJ-18 or YJ-83 anti-ship missiles
HHQ-9 series long range SAM
2 × 30 mm remote controlled gun
1 × H/PJ-12 CIWS or H/PJ-11 CIWS
1 × HHQ-10 short range SAM in 24-cell launcher
6 torpedo tubes
4 × 18-tube decoy rocket launcher

Hull number 170 is a Luyang Class II / Type 052C
The Class III is also called a carrier killer.
12 posted on 10/01/2018 12:37:14 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The only way the Chinese can destroy anything is with a Kamikaze move


13 posted on 10/01/2018 12:37:53 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If the ChiComs want to play are ramming the it is high time to take the USS Missouri out of retirement as it has 12 inch thick belt armor and would go through their ships like toilet paper.


14 posted on 10/01/2018 12:38:11 PM PDT by WMarshal (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

I was thinking the same thing. There was a good amount of hard contact in the East Med and Black Sea with the Soviet Navy.

There is a video on YouTube of a Krivak class frigate making hard contact while the loudspeakers are blasting what sounds like a Russian version of the Beatles Back in the SSSR.


15 posted on 10/01/2018 12:50:45 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

45 meters for a ship at sea is CLOSE.


16 posted on 10/01/2018 12:58:02 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

How much of that technology did they get from SpyFi and the Clintons?


17 posted on 10/01/2018 1:10:51 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A little bit of ‘tickling the dragon’s tail’?


18 posted on 10/01/2018 1:20:30 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Get in the Spirit! The Spirit of '76!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It is refreshing to have one our ships change course for a change.


19 posted on 10/01/2018 1:38:48 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

Are the fuel systems on the Missouri intact?

Note the BBs are in storage more or less and there is a now an American submarine featuring the name Missouri.


20 posted on 10/01/2018 1:47:10 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson